Application [Conquer Online Private Server Section]

[{ Angelius }]

i wold say ..... Hell No

[Spirited]

Hey everyone.

I would like to clarify a pattern that I'm seeing on this thread. People who are trying to make their points based on claims that do not reflect my personality should try to find new, more relevant support. Currently, relevance falls within the duration of this account (according to the application requirements). Thank you for your opinions, but please keep your posts relevant to the current status of my account.

Sincerely,
Spirited Fang

[lostsolder05]

Originally Posted by Fаng

Hey everyone.

I would like to clarify a pattern that I'm seeing on this thread. People who are trying to make their points based on claims that do not reflect my personality should try to find new, more relevant support. Currently, relevance falls within the duration of this account (according to the application requirements). Thank you for your opinions, but please keep your posts relevant to the current status of my account.

Sincerely,
Spirited Fang

If only this account applies which I might add is quite ignorant because you still own the other accounts & they reflect your "personality" regardless of when or were it happened. But, lets look past that I would like to point out that you yourself stated this account to have a little over 6 months activity in your application. I find this strikingly odd that your trying to get an Moderation position with a little bit over 6 months of activity on said account.

Interesting quite interesting indeed.

[Spirited]

Originally Posted by lostsolder05

If only this account applies which I might add is quite ignorant because you still own the other accounts & they reflect your "personality" regardless of when or were it happened. But, lets look past that I would like to point out that you yourself stated this account to have a little over 6 months activity in your application. I find this strikingly odd that your trying to get an Moderation position with a little bit over 6 months of activity on said account.

Interesting quite interesting indeed.

Thank you for your concern, but if you read the application requirements, only 3 months of activity are required to apply and to be considered for acceptance here. Also, if you read my application (which is going to be longer in a few minutes once I finish editing it), you will see that I have years of experience. I will be adding my moderator experience to my application soon.

Edit: Let me also remind you and your friends that this is not a discussion thread.

[m7mdxlife]

Originally Posted by Fаng

Hey everyone.

I would like to clarify a pattern that I'm seeing on this thread. People who are trying to make their points based on claims that do not reflect my personality should try to find new, more relevant support. Currently, relevance falls within the duration of this account (according to the application requirements). Thank you for your opinions, but please keep your posts relevant to the current status of my account.

Sincerely,
Spirited Fang

and that is why i kept telling my self i should do it and point to the obvious fact that Fang is Fang and he will never change..

you saw a pattern? claims that DO NOT reflect your personality? dude a human personality is not linked to account he created on an online forum. just because your account that is 6 months old got a semi good reputation it doesn't mean it reflects your personality. and if you are so good in seeing patterns then please tell us what you see in this >>> (making an account then getting banned for *** knows what then coming back with a new account and personality, then getting banned again or rage quit and few days later coming back with a new account and new personality and so on and so on.) patterns? anything?

look dude, you got all this figured out wrong, if you really do believe that this new account of yours is your new personality then i really feel sorry for you.

how do you expect to become a successful moderator around the forums when you cant even have a valid argument with another member?

your problem is your way of thinking mate, get that fixed 1st then apply for a moderator. or simply apply for a moderator and don't post anything other than the application because it might make you look stupid.

[lostsolder05]

Originally Posted by Fаng

Thank you for your concern, but if you read the application requirements, only 3 months of activity are required to apply and to be considered for acceptance here. Also, if you read my application (which is going to be longer in a few minutes once I finish editing it), you will see that I have years of experience. I will be adding my moderator experience to my application soon.

"Considered", but acceptable? Surely not after 3 months. That's just a cheap gimmick. I would also like to point out Just a few months ago you rage quit the forums for the 9001th time over criticism. Somehow this is not linking up to the information you've supplied in your application in which you clearly state you have years dealing with people. Perhaps your fibbing a bit?

As I see you continue to come up with cheap replies I will no longer bother replying to this discussion as I believe this is just turning into a pointless debate.

Also I'd suggest you look into Dissociative identity disorder - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia As you seem to jump from 1 personality to another quite often.

Thank you,
Justin

[pro4never]

You're more than welcome to post your opinion on if Fang would make a good moderator but lets just leave it at that.

It's already been mentioned. You should be stating your opinion and reasons for your opinion and leaving it at that.

Attacking members is against the epvp rules and while I'm not claiming that people are taking it quite that far right now, it's sure coming close. Lets keep on topic. Would fang make a good moderator or not any why do you feel as you do.

[m7mdxlife]

Originally Posted by Fаng

Most, if not all, residential ip addresses are dynamic unless changed by the user's configuration (in most countries). ISPs sometimes don't refresh ip addresses that quickly either. With *** Communications (my ISP), for example, you need to leave your router unplugged all night. Also, if you keep your posts relevant to the topic, then I have no reason to have them deleted.

this is one of your recent replies to a thread on the co forums, you got the attitude as a member, add that with a mod status.... boy!

go ahead report me for off-topic even tho this relates to it in many different ways, you can change your accounts but you cant change your attitude.

[xBlackPlagu3x]

I personally think Fangerz would make a great moderator! All of the haters and nay-sayers may think they know him all so well, but how about outside of e*pvpers? (No I don't mean real life) What about everything else he's done? He has an incredible blog containing incredible resources for people that I've never seen taken down in the almost year that I've known this guy. Sure he might have been what you guys didn't want him to be back then, but people do change. Remember when I was a noob at coding? Well now I'm only a nooblet. Hence, proven, people change.

On a more relevant note, at this other competing form, Fang was a fantastic mod/admin and did what he could to help everyone out. You guys might not see it, but if you don't see it and continue to shizz-talk him, then it's just being insanely ignorant. The matter of fact is, Fang releases fantastic things, posts fantastic guides as well as posts, and even if he did remove them, he always has the right to. It's his stuff he's releasing/posting after all. He retains all rights to it, there's nothing in the TOS that says he doesn't. Besides, if ya'll are so sketchy on it, why not just give him a test-run? If he passes, it's permanent, if not, he's back to a member. Seems fair to me.

Also, the comment about questioning his ability to mod over friendship:
I'm sure that us, as his friends would HOPE that he would moderate us over his friendship, because the real friends would understand. So like honestly, I wouldn't even stress about it. Jeez, you guys are acting as if this is some real life NFL draft or something.

Edit: Lol, I forgot the most important aspect of this post. HELL YEAH, FANG FOR MOD 2012!

[Deсker]

Originally Posted by xBlackPlagu3x

if ya'll are so sketchy on it, why not just give him a test-run? If he passes, it's permanent, if not, he's back to a member. Seems fair to me.

That's not really professionalism.

--------



Exactly mine, and everyone Else's point.

[xBlackPlagu3x]

Originally Posted by Deсker

That's not really professionalism.

It's a forum for games.
--------



Exactly mine, and everyone Else's point.

The point being when people have a legitimate reason to get ****** off, they do so?

[Spirited]

Originally Posted by Deсker

That's not really professionalism.

Thank you Decker for your accurate response. Your opinion is valid, however, most members here are also looking at my progression. If you go to Arco's profile (where the bottom post is posted), you'll notice the progressive return of my true personality. In fact, you copied my final posting and posted it as well to Arco's profile. I no longer respond to such immature postings on my walls and videos.

This application seems to be getting spammed by four people. This is not a discussion thread and this is not the appropriate, respectful behavior expected for application threads. Thanks again for your honest opinions.

Sincerely,
Spirited Fang

[m7mdxlife]

you are applying for a mod, members need to share their opinions " yes/no " and why.

and since you brought it up, thats another reason why you shouldn't be a moderator, you cant even tell the difference between a valid post and a spam, which will end up messing up the conquer sections.

[Korvacs]

Originally Posted by m7mdxlife

you are applying for a mod, members need to share their opinions " yes/no " and why.

and since you brought it up, thats another reason why you shouldn't be a moderator, you cant even tell the difference between a valid post and a spam, which will end up messing up the conquer sections.

I think you need to remember that first of all he wont be the only moderator in the section, and secondly he would have a trial period of a few months, any serious issues with his moderation would be picked up almost immediately if its as bad as you suggest and he would be removed.

His attitude has changed quite alot over his time here, the same cant be said for you Decker, pretty sure the only reason your still not being repeatedly banned is because the staff grew tired of having to report and ban you, that's certainly the reason why i stopped.

[Angel.Tears.Co]

A simple No should do the job I guess.