[Mini-Release] Custom Unique Notifies

[#HB]

[Laag#82]

good job

if you can add in guard (why dll)


And don't forget to add your system message at textuisystem, for example:

PHP Code:

1    UIIT_MSG_APPEAR_SETH    0    0    0    0    0    0    Seth has appeared on Earth.    0    0    0    0    0    0    0 


example:-

SendNotify("UIIT_MSG_APPEAR_SETH");

PHP Code:

public void SendNotify(string Msg)
{
 /* BLUE */
 Packet packet = new Packet(0x300C);
 packet.WriteUInt16(3100);
 packet.WriteUInt8(1);
 packet.WriteAscii(Msg);
 C_Security.Send(packet);
 Send(false);
} 


good luck

[#HB]

Originally Posted by khaleed2010

if you can add in guard (why dll)

A lot of reasons.

-Why would I waste network, memory and processing to re-send a data that is already being sent but just in a different shape?
Since this packet is received by all clients, so my way will be more network saving than yours. That's small things that some people may not notice or care about. But scientifically, they can make even a tiny difference in speed.
Why do you think joymax did that in sro_client internally as well instead of server files?

-It's not about being a DLL or filter, we usually use a DLL to modify/control main executable code, at least in this field.
So, you can imagine that this is the real executable code, because in theory, it is true.

[Mr.Awesome1337]

You made my day, awesome release, thank you.

[Takashipvp]

Originally Posted by #HB

A lot of reasons.

-Why would I waste network, memory and processing to re-send a data that is already being sent but just in a different shape?
Since this packet is received by all clients, so my way will be more network saving than yours. That's small things that some people may not notice or care about. But scientifically, they can make even a tiny difference in speed.
Why do you think joymax did that in sro_client internally as well instead of server files?

-It's not about being a DLL or filter, we usually use a DLL to modify/control main executable code, at least in this field.
So, you can imagine that this is the real executable code, because in theory, it is true.

Yes you are right good job

[Mr.Awesome1337]

Feedback: using the dll downloaded works fine with "Seth' unique but trying to modify the unique code, the sro_client crashes once unique appears

[#HB]

Originally Posted by Mr.Awesome1337

Feedback: using the dll downloaded works fine with "Seth' unique but trying to modify the unique code, the sro_client crashes once unique appears

I added 3 different uniques notifies and it works fine for me.

Please ensure that you're using VC80 aka VS 2005 and building on Release. You can provide a dump file as well.

[Mr.Awesome1337]

Oh, okay I will be downloading it and reporting back

[Mr.Awesome1337]

Is it possible to use vs 2019? if yes then here we go
dump file:
crashing once the unique appears

[#HB]

Originally Posted by Mr.Awesome1337

Is it possible to use vs 2019? if yes then here we go
dump file:
crashing once the unique appears

Since SRO was compiled on VC80 aka VS 2005, we have to get along with old structures to dodge any errors caused by the sro_client.

Originally Posted by #HB

Note: Structures found in the files are for VC80 libs, back when strings were 28 bytes. You'll face errors, if you work with any later compiler.

[Mr.Awesome1337]

Originally Posted by #HB

Since SRO was compiled on VC80 aka VS 2005, we have to get along with old structures to dodge any errors caused by the sro_client.

I tried it on 2005 but got an error saying that this file was created in a newer version

[#HB]

Originally Posted by Mr.Awesome1337

I tried it on 2005 but got an error saying that this file was created in a newer version

Yeah, just create a new clean project and copy header and source files into it.

[Mr.Awesome1337]

Originally Posted by #HB

Yeah, just create a new clean project and copy header and source files into it.

here i got 5 errors after i copy the header and source files

[#HB]

Originally Posted by Mr.Awesome1337

here i got 5 errors after i copy the header and source files

Open each of them, and write this in the first line:

#include "stdafx.h"

Alternative solution, in case you didn't even wanna use a precompiled header:

Select Your Project from Solution Explorer -> Alt + Enter to open Properties -> Configuration Properties -> Precompiled Headers -> Precompiled Header -> Switch it to "Not Using Precompiled Headers"

[Mr.Awesome1337]

Originally Posted by #HB

Open each of them, and write this in the first line:

#include "stdafx.h"

Alternative solution, in case you didn't even wanna use a precompiled header:

Select Your Project from Solution Explorer -> Alt + Enter to open Properties -> Configuration Properties -> Precompiled Headers -> Precompiled Header -> Switch it to "Not Using Precompiled Headers"

when i'm Not Using Precompiled Headers i got more errors and when i write this #include "stdafx.h" in first line also errors appear

While using #include "stdafx.h"


while Not Using Precompiled Headers