[Release] Get Player Structure Call

[BytePipe]

Ahaha, Faze'is awwwesuume

[alexmen10]

Originally Posted by golle12

was only an example ô.o

Example work :

                
                        mov ebx, [IDplayer] 
			push ebx
			call   S4Client.exe+AE370
			mov     ecx, eax
			call   S4Client.exe+AE9260 //TouchDown
			ret
			nop

[RingleRangleRob]

Originally Posted by makoyecol

i really dont understand that S4Client.exe + ???? please help me to understand it

Base Address of S4Client.exe + Offset

Originally Posted by alexmen10

Example work :

                
                        mov ebx, [IDplayer] 
			push ebx
			call   S4Client.exe+AE370
			mov     ecx, eax
			call   S4Client.exe+AE9260 //TouchDown
			ret
			nop

useless nop :/

[BytePipe]

Originally Posted by alexmen10

Exaūmple work :

                
                        mov ebx, [IDplayer] 
			push ebx
			call   S4Client.exe+AE370
			mov     ecx, eax
			call   S4Client.exe+AE9260 //TouchDown
			ret
			nop

You can do so MANY with Player ID's, AE370 is not the only class

[Cyrex']

Originally Posted by Successfully

You can do so MANY with Player ID's, AE370 is not the only class

are you kidding actually? base + ae370 isnt a class, allocated classes are in .data/.rdata this is a call and in the .code section

ontopic: good job faze

edit: Y U NO USE THE THIS PTR DIRECTLY WITHIN THE CLASS?!??

if you have the instance you can reverse the object and within that the function is either in a vftable or a normal function. it would be way easier to use and more efficient.

But good work

[BytePipe]

Originally Posted by Cyrex'

are you kidding actually? base + ae370 isnt a class, allocated classes are in .data/.rdata this is a call and in the .code section

ontopic: good job faze

edit: Y U NO USE THE THIS PTR DIRECTLY WITHIN THE CLASS?!??

if you have the instance you can reverse the object and within that the function is either in a vftable or a normal function. it would be way easier to use and more efficient.

But good work

For sure it isnt a class. Assembly language dont know directly the Word "class" or "struct". Classes themselfes are primarily only used in real object oriented programming languages. It's actual clear that my indirect statement should clarifies the sense/purpose of function pointers.

[Cyrex']

Originally Posted by Successfully

For sure it isnt a class. Assembly language dont know directly the Word "class" or "struct". Classes themselfes are primarily only used in real object oriented programming languages. It's actual clear that my indirect statement should clarifies the sense/purpose of function pointers.

nah its not that clear