Moderator Application - World of Warcraft

[Kirby]

Since I have no experience in the World of Warcraft section, I cannot comment positively or negatively on this application.

However, I am firmly convinced that this is not a discussion thread.
Accusiations of any kind are quite unnecessary, whether from the applicant nor from users.

One message per person is enough to leave a (objective) negative or positive comment on the application.



B2T: Good Luck with your application.

[tamedbeast]

Originally Posted by zerogott

They are literally looking for Mods for the WoW section.
So it doesn't matter if you think that section needs a mod or not, lol.

This was literally why I applied

Mod or Not I will still be here.

[venitari]

beast is a chad, some devs dont want there names public readable so dm is fine <3

[Hypahypa]

I can also vouch for tamedbeast, have known him for several years and he has massive experience and knowledge that you would expect a moderator for the wow-section to have.

[Mr_Hunter]

Would also vote for him.

[0x41^4]

Originally Posted by tamedbeast

While I respect you have the right you an opinion, you're opinion is very inaccurate. I do not shill, or have any bias towards any one person on this forum. I think your problem with me is the fact that I will not hold a bias as you do for GGL. My opinions don't align with yours which is fine, and it's been very evident that your connection to GGL is well beyond just a user, and your determination to convince users to use one said platform shows the bais, while I offer and recommend several different platforms regardless of their ability to maintain updates.

I know the only reason you decided to chime in on this, is because I don't have the same passion to shill for one product (GGL) like yourself.

On a second note, if I can help users find something that suits their needs from the messages that they send me, I have helped the forums greatly, most of these users return to the forums and frequent them afterward due to that trust factor. In fact, my forum post is one of the top five viewed and active posts of all time on Epvp in the World of Warcraft section, I have likely brought hundreds if not thousands of new members to this forum from external sources such as Google search results just from my posts alone.

My takeaway from your reply was that you're worried I would use my leverage with epvp moderator status to attack your beloved GGL, and I can simply say now, I don't need a moderator status to do such a thing and still have the same effect due to my trust factor with users on the forums and off the forums. If you want my opinion to change on a product, you should ask your friends over at GGL to fix their products and update them. I'm sure if I had a bias for your friends you would love to recommend me

Edit: The World of Warcraft Pixel Bot Review thread has changed several times, some things are recommended over others based on their current development cycle and changes to their platform that make them more or less of a viable solution for users. Even if there is something I don't recommend but I see it suits what they're looking for I would still suggest it.

This is a very odd response, and further demonstrates the validity of my concerns.

My support for any product is not relevant to this discussion, nor was it relevant to my opinion on your application. This is a topic on your readiness to take on the responsibility of a moderator position while representing EPvP. Your response thus far indicates a lack of the maturity needed for the position.

Even if you exclusively supported GGL (which, again, is irrelevant), my opinion would remain unchanged. Your lack of transparency raises concerns about potential misuse of the role.

Those of us who manage the provider list here do so with accountability in mind. We don't leave out providers simply because of personal dislikes, nor do we endorse products purely for incentives. We make our recommendations and reviews public, allowing the community to participate in oversight.

Consider this scenario: If I were advising users in the WoW section to message me privately for 'the best rotation bot' and then in DMs, recommending a provider like HandsFree—which is known for its issues with detections and exit scams—solely because I was being paid, you would likely agree that such behavior is not only disingenuous but also undermines my integrity and the community's? And while I am not accusing you of doing this, I am saying that by intentionally removing the community from the discussion, you are preventing the community from holding you honest and accountable.

With all of that being said, I don't see a point in dragging this on further, so this will be my last post. I gave my opinion, and my only advice for you going forward is to simply bring your recommendations public.

GL.

[tamedbeast]

Originally Posted by 0x41^4

This is a very odd response, and further demonstrates the validity of my concerns.

My support for any product is not relevant to this discussion, nor was it relevant to my opinion on your application. This is a topic on your readiness to take on the responsibility of a moderator position while representing EPvP. Your response thus far indicates a lack of the maturity needed for the position.

Even if you exclusively supported GGL (which, again, is irrelevant), my opinion would remain unchanged. Your lack of transparency raises concerns about potential misuse of the role.

Those of us who manage the provider list here do so with accountability in mind. We don't leave out providers simply because of personal dislikes, nor do we endorse products purely for incentives. We make our recommendations and reviews public, allowing the community to participate in oversight.

Consider this scenario: If I were advising users in the WoW section to message me privately for 'the best rotation bot' and then in DMs, recommending a provider like HandsFree—which is known for its issues with detections and exit scams—solely because I was being paid, you would likely agree that such behavior is not only disingenuous but also undermines my integrity and the community's? And while I am not accusing you of doing this, I am saying that by intentionally removing the community from the discussion, you are preventing the community from holding you honest and accountable.

With all of that being said, I don't see a point in dragging this on further, so this will be my last post. I gave my opinion, and my only advice for you going forward is to simply bring your recommendations public.

GL.

As stated above, this isn't a discussion forum for how you feel, this is a moderation application based on their request for moderation of that section. No one really has any idea what you're talking about here, other than chiming in because of your bias for GGL and my opinion on GGL wasn't in line with your own. You can leave, as you made your opinion known already, further replies are just a discussion and flaming and this isn't what this thread is made for.

If you feel you want to give me a "lecture" you can open a thread in an off-topic or send me a message.

Thanks.

[Natsu Dragneel]

mh, why not, yes

[Lactorin]

I can also vouch for tamedbeast, he always helps the WoW Community!

[Squeeker]

I dont generally post here but I have always seen tamedbeastin the community helping over the years every time ive come to the forum looking for information and the majority of the time find myself browsing either his post or his thread to find the info I am looking for.

Also, its crazy that a guy is here essentially saying (paraphrasing) "I dont support this because what if this guy is a fraud/scamming. I'm not accusing him of being that and i have no evidence of him being that but what if he could be" who the hell can you not say that about.

[andii]

#added [WoW]