Change in Encryption

xmen01235 · 02/02/2013, 02:03

I know it will not be given in public.....

Lateralus · 02/02/2013, 02:42

What is the point of this thread?

xmen01235 · 02/02/2013, 03:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lateralus

What is the point of this thread?

It is just an indirect way of asking if someone is willing to share it

.

InfamousNoone · 02/02/2013, 06:30

It's not that many changes to the current encryption. It's not a big change, good luck!

_DreadNought_ · 02/02/2013, 17:33

Isn't it just a key change?

New key: C238xs65pjy7HU9Q

teroareboss1 · 02/02/2013, 17:55

No. I think... is a new crypto on DH packet

M.Dego · 02/02/2013, 19:11

i think, the encryption changed to "blowfish" again.

{ Angelius } · 02/03/2013, 03:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by _DreadNought_

Isn't it just a key change?

New key: C238xs65pjy7HU9Q

That and a ridiculous edit to Libeay32\CAST that's all there is to it :|

I can't believe TQ is that desperate lol

Korvacs · 02/03/2013, 11:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by { Angelius }

That and a ridiculous edit to Libeay32\CAST that's all there is to it :|

I can't believe TQ is that desperate lol

If they were desperate they would spend a large amount of money on a more sophisticated encryption system.

{ Angelius } · 02/03/2013, 14:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Korvacs

If they were desperate they would spend a large amount of money on a more sophisticated encryption system.

They are desperate enough... And i for one witnessed it on many occasions, but they are in no means interested in spending a large amount of money on some new encryption system only to have us crack it again.. again and again and again.. And i think that no matter how "sophisticated" their encryption system is... As long as we have access to the client and the tools to debug it any new encryption is vulnerable and will be cracked in time..

_DreadNought_ · 02/03/2013, 14:52

If they have anything spectacular lined up it'll be launched with the release of Conquer 3.0 ... Assuming it does get released.

Korvacs · 02/03/2013, 16:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by { Angelius }

They are desperate enough... And i for one witnessed it on many occasions, but they are in no means interested in spending a large amount of money on some new encryption system only to have us crack it again.. again and again and again.. And i think that no matter how "sophisticated" their encryption system is... As long as we have access to the client and the tools to debug it any new encryption is vulnerable and will be cracked in time..

Hence why they are not desperate enough, they make no attempt to protect the client currently.

_DreadNought_ · 02/03/2013, 18:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by Korvacs

Hence why they are not desperate enough, they make no attempt to protect the client currently.

lol? They have implemented functionality in attempts to stop reverse engineering of the client.

Korvacs · 02/03/2013, 19:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by _DreadNought_

lol? They have implemented functionality in attempts to stop reverse engineering of the client.

Oh sorry,

They make basically no attempt to protect the client.

CptSky · 02/03/2013, 19:24

CO2 is still profitable... They'll shutdown the game as they did for M&M when it was no longer profitable due to bots... So, they won't invest money in protection. Maybe for CO3 ?