|
You last visited: Today at 16:16
Advertisement
Encryption
Discussion on Encryption within the CO2 Private Server forum part of the Conquer Online 2 category.
11/30/2008, 22:25
|
#1
|
elite*gold: 0 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 46
Received Thanks: 5
|
Encryption
What is so good about having a client that is 5017+?
And this encryption......what is it?
|
|
|
|
11/30/2008, 22:26
|
#2
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,590
Received Thanks: 154
|
Its blowfish + a DH-Key exchange for all I know.
Some say it's complicated, others say it's not what it's cracked up to be. I really don't know.
Chances of you getting it though: Slim to none.
|
|
|
|
|
11/30/2008, 22:31
|
#3
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 805
Received Thanks: 464
|
What's good about having a client 5017+? You'd be able to run a server using the official client/ patch. The encryption is the login packet, which is encrypted with the dh key exchange, to make a proxy/ private server, you have to decrypt it to login. That's basically all, without details.
|
|
|
|
|
11/30/2008, 22:45
|
#4
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 46
Received Thanks: 5
|
I still dont get why you would go past 5017 nothing is new as far as i see
|
|
|
|
|
11/30/2008, 22:52
|
#5
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,125
Received Thanks: 2,518
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob9877
I still dont get why you would go past 5017 nothing is new as far as i see
|
The last year has seen the largest increases of content since conquer started <_<"
|
|
|
|
|
11/30/2008, 23:01
|
#6
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 692
Received Thanks: 353
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Korvacs
The last year has seen the largest increases of content since conquer started <_<"
|
Not that any of the new content compares with the CO1 days. 
|
|
|
|
|
11/30/2008, 23:23
|
#7
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,125
Received Thanks: 2,518
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nTL3fTy
Not that any of the new content compares with the CO1 days. |
Indeed, but still the greatest quantity
|
|
|
|
|
12/01/2008, 00:33
|
#8
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,734
Received Thanks: 1,000
|
quantity indeed, wish they would go for quality instead.
|
|
|
|
|
12/01/2008, 00:42
|
#9
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,012
Received Thanks: 2,882
|
Ninjas = new patch.
|
|
|
|
|
12/01/2008, 00:44
|
#10
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,734
Received Thanks: 1,000
|
Oh darn, forgot about that one. Do you want to find me the place in asm where it keeps waiting for the handshake packet? (Or whatever kept it hanging before, lol) That way I could just disable the encryption fully and go on from there. xD
|
|
|
|
|
12/01/2008, 00:50
|
#11
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,590
Received Thanks: 154
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tanelipe
Oh darn, forgot about that one. Do you want to find me the place in asm where it keeps waiting for the handshake packet? (Or whatever kept it hanging before, lol) That way I could just disable the encryption fully and go on from there. xD
|
That'd be epic, other than the fact that it'd kind of be weird to use it.
If you do use it for a new public server, every server could upgrade to the new client, using your client. And the fact that you'd have to disable the handshake for every new patch you upgrade to
If you use it for yourself... uhhh... why? It'd just be a private server on localhost; I guess if you want to "play with yourself" its okay 
|
|
|
|
|
12/01/2008, 02:00
|
#12
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 46
Received Thanks: 5
|
I dont get why people who have the Encryption dont at least least try to help the rest of us by guiding us though with it
|
|
|
|
|
12/01/2008, 02:03
|
#13
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,590
Received Thanks: 154
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob9877
I dont get why people who have the Encryption dont at least least try to help the rest of us by guiding us though with it
|
I don't know either.
Reasons could be:
1)People are selfish,
2)They are just plain ********  ,
3)They feel we should do it ourselves to learn,
4)They don't think we should have it because we're noobs.
|
|
|
|
|
12/01/2008, 02:09
|
#14
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 46
Received Thanks: 5
|
I dont think they should just Release it but make a guide about how to do it so that we learn in the process
|
|
|
|
|
12/01/2008, 03:25
|
#15
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,013
Received Thanks: 381
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tao4229
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob9877
I dont get why people who have the Encryption dont at least least try to help the rest of us by guiding us though with it
|
I don't know either.
Reasons could be:
1)People are selfish,
2)They are just plain assholes ,
3)They feel we should do it ourselves to learn,
4)They don't think we should have it because we're noobs. |
Or it could just be that people are lazy bastards. You've already been told it's Blowfish + DH exchange, but you've probably made no, or little effort to actually try and implement it. In the end, you're all just after one of us "selfish plain assholes" to do the damn thing for you, hypocritical bastard. There's really nothing else you need to know, other than the initial blowfish key, and anyone with 5 minutes experience debugging software could find that.
You're not going to learn shit by having someone else do it for you. There's no point in me writing passages of text describing the two algorithms when they're already widely avaliable if you know how to use a bloody search engine.
So yeah, the reason I don't give it to people, is because I dislike people who can't think for themselves. The people with any form of intelligence here are more than capable of doing it themselves, and I don't mind helping those. I'm not going to help anyone who hasn't even attempted a fucking thing.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Similar Threads
|
encryption
08/17/2010 - CO2 Private Server - 0 Replies
anybody can explain this?
I got it from another site about encryptions and cryptographers.
but didn't understand much of it, so if anybody can explain better.
//********************
//KEYS
//********************
//Binary
//********************
01000101 01111000 01111000 00100000 01111011 00100000 00101111 00101111 01000101 01111000 01111000 00100000 01001000 01100101 01111000 00100000 01100011 01110010 01111001 01110000 01110100 01101111 00001101 00001010 01111000 00101000 01001000...
|
[HELP] Password encryption
12/26/2009 - CO2 Private Server - 27 Replies
What Password encryption does conquer have? i want to code register script and don`t know encryption for password,its not md5.
|
Proxy with new encryption
09/24/2009 - CO2 Private Server - 6 Replies
Hello everyone! I would like to have some infos to get or make a proxy to get some packets from TQServer. Thanks for reply!
|
RF CM encryption??
05/20/2008 - RF Online - 5 Replies
I was playing a little with WPE and now it seems all packets are ciphered, cause for example, when you throw away an item you could recognise a pattern, but now all i can see are random bytes in the throw away packets. Could it be cause of the last patch that CM has applied? Has anyone experienced this?
Sorry pls move this thread to the other forum
|
Packet Encryption
02/22/2007 - General Coding - 4 Replies
so heute mal nichts zu tun also hab ich mal nach einem opfer ausschau gehalten und stieß dabei auf steam
steam ist wie vermutlich jeder weiß eine online platform zum kaufen und spielen von spielen
einige dinge die ich mir ueberlegt hab:
steam bruter
no-recoil hack fuer cs
ein steam bruter gab es soweit ich weiß noch nicht und koennte sich als sehr nuetzlich erweisen natuerlich sollte er interface unabhaengig sein und rein auf packet basis arbeiten
keke wireshark angeschmissen...
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 16:16.
|
|
