[Suggestion] Trading System

[«Ice.Shock™]

I suggest doing some changes on your trading system due to a lot of people getting scammed and here are my ideas :

1. Chat To Trade

Well nobody likes the trade on Private Message and most of the people use Skype well here is what I want to change.. When you request trade and your trading mate accepts it you will get "Trading Chat" and there you can trade safe. (Note : Add logs to the chat!)

2. Making Moderators able to trade

Everyone knows that before someone become Moderator he is able to trade, be middleman etc.. but after becoming moderator most of those features are getting removed so my idea is to enable trading for Moderators.

3. To be option to cancel trade if both sides disagree

If the seller don't want to trade with that person he will be able to Cancel trade but that action will be disabled if one of the sides vote for +1 / -1 so it wont be abused during a trade.

Note : I suggest also adding people to "review" trades and see if some of them is scamming and if he does action will be taken.

[JuJoker]

The Trading System is perfect, it don't need any changes.

[Kentika]

Hello Ice.Shock,
could you add a poll?

Originally Posted by «Ice.Shock™

I suggest doing some changes on your trading system due to a lot of people getting scammed and here are my ideas :

1. Chat To Trade

Well nobody likes the trade on Private Message and most of the people use Skype well here is what I want to change.. When you request trade and your trading mate accepts it you will get "Trading Chat" and there you can trade safe. (Note : Add logs to the chat!)

It isn't possible to add a chat because the perfomance of the server wouldn't handle that.

Originally Posted by «Ice.Shock™

2. Making Moderators able to trade

Everyone knows that before someone become Moderator he is able to trade, be middleman etc.. but after becoming moderator most of those features are getting removed so my idea is to enable trading for Moderators.

Moderators are allowed to Trade why shouldn't they?

Originally Posted by «Ice.Shock™

3. To be option to cancel trade if both sides disagree

If the seller don't want to trade with that person he will be able to Cancel trade but that action will be disabled if one of the sides vote for +1 / -1 so it wont be abused during a trade.

Note : I suggest also adding people to "review" trades and see if some of them is scamming and if he does action will be taken.

I do not really understand that question but anyways, the trading system is perfect as it is. You can't prevent a scam before it even happened also Mai-Lin is doing a good Job, thats why every user gets his deserved punishment.

[newbliss]

I think the Trade system is good and doesn't need any changes.

Moderators are able to trade or ? I think they are. But i never was a Mod

An Instant Messenger is a good idea for trading. Because many scammers scam over Skype or sth. but the performance of the server wouldn't handle it like Kentika sayd in the post over mine.

[Callum]

Originally Posted by JuJoker

The Trading System is perfect, it don't need any changes.

Wrong. There are some flaws, such as


- Before you buy a treasure, you cannot reveal what is inside (obviously) but, when I bought a minecraft account through a treasure, inside it it said "THIS ACCOUNT CONTAINS NO EMAIL / SECRET QUESTION". I didn't bother to file a scam report, because it was only 35e*g, but I think It's still something which can be improved upon.

Originally Posted by Kentika

Hello Ice.Shock,
It isn't possible to add a chat because the perfomance of the server wouldn't handle that.

How would you know what the server specifications are? :P

[Kentika]

Originally Posted by Creationist

Wrong. There are some flaws, such as


- Before you buy a treasure, you cannot reveal what is inside (obviously) but, when I bought a minecraft account through a treasure, inside it it said "THIS ACCOUNT CONTAINS NO EMAIL / SECRET QUESTION". I didn't bother to file a scam report, because it was only 35e*g, but I think It's still something which can be improved upon.


How would you know what the server specifications are? :P

Because this suggestion has often been made. It has always been declined because the hardware wouldn't handle that :-)