[OPINIONS] Botting vs Stability

[Royalblades]

Heya guys,

simple short question:

What is more important to you, botting or server stability. Stability means that a server doesn't get exploited and stays online lagless ofc.

Nezekan/Qyncho please don't start going offtopic here, I know you both love doing that, however it's not needed here.

Thanks

[鳳凰城]

Forqot me

well, stability + botting is any player's dream. but for me, I'd rather joining a stable server than crowded with useless senseless walking characters looping like ultra gay naked justin biber.

[Nezekan]

Originally Posted by Royalblades

Heya guys,

simple short question:

What is more important to you, botting or server stability. Stability means that a server doesn't get exploited and stays online lagless ofc.

Nezekan/Qyncho please don't start going offtopic here, I know you both love doing that, however it's not needed here.

Thanks

What has stability to do with botting?

The only server that has both is venture

[Wayne3]

Originally Posted by Nezekan

What has stability to do with botting?

The only server that has both is venture

Not really the only one.

[ZiCo*]

There's a difference between (Botting Allowed , Abusing Bot+Multi Client Allowed)

Also I would like you to clarify the relation between stability and botting since both are not related to each other.

[magicanoo]

Why not both?

You can compile your own bot using your own opcodes,there are several source code(s) for bots out there.But if you have enough money,you can hire a decent reverse engineer to fix these exploits without changing the abused opcode.

[Callum]

I'd rather play a stable server, with medium rates and hand-grind, than bot on an unstable server, return back after 30 minutes, and I've been disconnected. So yeah, I'd rather stability.

[Nezekan]

Originally Posted by Wayne3

Not really the only one.

Give me another example? (I'm not being sarcastic, I'd really like to know)


I don't really get the question, there is no real co-relation between stability and allowing bots, it just happens that the only bugless server doesn't allow botting?

Originally Posted by magicanoo

Why not both?

You can compile your own bot using your own opcodes,there are several source code(s) for bots out there.But if you have enough money,you can hire a decent reverse engineer to fix these exploits without changing the abused opcode.

Well, that wouldn't really work, if you're smart enough to fix these exploits you can find more efficient ways to block existing bots, and simply changing the opcodes in an open source bot won't really get you far

[martynas123boxter]

Botting+Stability with low exp and drop rates, this sh*t is krall

[Callum]

Originally Posted by martynas123boxter

Botting+Stability with low exp and drop rates, this sh*t is krall

But if you could only choose one, which would you choose?

[Nezekan]

Originally Posted by Creationist

But if you could only choose one, which would you choose?

Logic would say: playing without bots > not playing at all

but apparently SRO players break logic

[martynas123boxter]

Originally Posted by Creationist

But if you could only choose one, which would you choose?

what's the point of botting in server that has 1 hour of normal, lagless gameplay?
I'd choose playing in lagless, crashless, botless server rather then fyll bug,fyll crash...
but ofcourse, if your server has like 10x-20x it won't attract alot of players, 40x-50x would be just fine for 80-100 caps.

[Callum]

So, a stable server, with medium rates, at 80-100 cap would be a perfect server?


(Medium rates = easy enough to hand-grind, and not get bored shitless in the first half hour)

[Alexiuns]

botting

[_HouseMusicx3]

Botting dont expect people to hand grind tons of stones/elexiers