[Request]100% Range

[Fun2]

It has been patched. Hackshield detected after a minute of login.

[marvinody]

o.0
maybe yours has, but mine is fine

[archermann]

*** this ****** me off so much. i was the one to originally to call it a key-logger. i know other people found it after me, but hey, whatever. my laptop crashed, so i cant find the address in it, but its somewhere in the beginning to middle. it doesnt work like a key-logger, so scanners wont detect it.... anyway, scanners detect commonly used stuff so i doubt it would pick it up. use it at your own risk is all i can say. if you get key-logged then hacked, dont complain. use at your own risk. it recoreds some of your first keystrokes, then emails them to some adress. again, use at own risk

[archermann]

people dont realize this is a keylogger....

[jimmyjoe2]

Crespoking is Rican aka Aaronn in Alexina. He is well known scammer and keylogger so beware this 13 year old. Children are greedy -_-

[jimmyjoe2]

Crespoking is Rican aka Aaronn of Alexina. He is well known scammer and keylogger.

[Blade3575]

Originally Posted by archermann

people dont realize this is a keylogger....

Originally Posted by jimmyjoe2

Crespoking is Rican aka Aaronn in Alexina. He is well known scammer and keylogger so beware this 13 year old. Children are greedy -_-

Go to page 13 and read what I wrote because it applies to the both of you.

We need a mod so these topics can be locked. Too many people are repeating what other people wrote and it's getting a little ridiculous how long it's been going on.

[Blade3575]

Originally Posted by archermann

*** this ****** me off so much. i was the one to originally to call it a key-logger. i know other people found it after me, but hey, whatever. my laptop crashed, so i cant find the address in it, but its somewhere in the beginning to middle. it doesnt work like a key-logger, so scanners wont detect it.... anyway, scanners detect commonly used stuff so i doubt it would pick it up. use it at your own risk is all i can say. if you get key-logged then hacked, dont complain. use at your own risk. it recoreds some of your first keystrokes, then emails them to some adress. again, use at own risk

Not only are you annoying, you're retarded. One, you can't spell, and two you don't need to say use it at you're own risk THREE times. Oh, and way to contradict yourself. You say it's a keylogger, but then say it doesn't act like one. If it's a keylogger then it will act like one and do what you would expect a keylogger to do. Also, haven't you heard of the heuristic algorithm? Doesn't need to be known to be detected.

[Celestial Link]

Pretty sad that people are this desperate to get the mod that they're willing to infect themselves with such a common and easy-to-avoid "virus" that hackers use to gain your login info. Btw, you guys, 100% ranged is so ******* simple to make, it isn't funny. If you had any bit of sense, you could find it and make the edit. It's so funny to watch these little monkeys scramble for the golden banana known as the Godshot edit, trusting the little tick on his little "contribution", when he's just going to suck you dry for all that you've earned with his keylogger. He's been confirmed to be a scammer, which gives you no place to whine once you lose everything.

On another note, I begged at some point for the edit myself, but I found it, unknowning what to do with it because of a little misconception, and didn't realize what to do till I went back and made a little comparison. Of course, that was my ignorance, laziness, and overlooking of some things. If I had double checked, I wouldn't have needed anybody's help. Gambling everything just for a small edit that's so simple and easy to see seems like a stupid decision to go with... I'm hoping that if you don't get keylogged and have your stuff taken...that you all get your ***** banned for using this. Same for the tard that made this ****** post, especially since you scam. One of these days, you'll all get yours for ruining the game for others and ruining our small secrets.

[InterCaps]

0x0B7A70 - 8C91 0000 84C0 EB(74)13 8B06 8BCE FF90 0000
0x0D3460 - FF74 2404 E899 D5FF FF85 C0EB(74) 098B 108B
0x0DC250 - CEE8 83AC F5FF 33FF 475F(F6) 8BC6(C308) 5E5B(7408) C210(578B) 0090(CEE8)
0x0F9A90 - 414C C204 008B 414C EB10(05E7) B9E8(0300) 0300(0033) 00F7(D2B9)
0x0F9AA0 - F18B(E803) D35B(0000) 9090(F7F1) C38B 4150 538B(05E7) D805(0300) E703(0033)
0x0F9AB0 - 0000(D2B9) 33D2(E803) EBE4(0000) 9090(F7F1)
0x1D5450 - 6D00 6500 0000 0000 00(53)00
0x1DC110 - 00(2F)00
0x1DC140 - 6E00 3200 2F00 0000 00(2F)00

A list of things that didn't fit in when compared.
Values in brackets were from a clean R54 Standard.dll (immediately following values in the uploaded file). Everything else was from the file the OP uploaded. Apologies if you don't understand how this was organized (lol).

Example: If you see something like "00(2F)00" it means the file the OP posted had "0000" and the original had "2F00".

Clean or no? You decide.

[Akuhura]

did anybody actually just diff that dll? >.>

658B6A82   74 14            JE SHORT Standard.658B6A98
...
658B7A76   74 13            JE SHORT Standard.658B7A8B
...
658D346B   74 09            JE SHORT Standard.658D3476
...
658DC259   F6C3 08          TEST BL,8
658DC25C   74 08            JE SHORT Standard.658DC266
658DC25E   57               PUSH EDI
658DC25F   8BCE             MOV ECX,ESI
658DC261   E8 1D450000      CALL Standard.?CheckWalk@lock_arg@core@@>
658DC266   F6C3 10          TEST BL,10
658DC269   74 08            JE SHORT Standard.658DC273
658DC26B   57               PUSH EDI
...
658F9A98   05 E7030000      ADD EAX,3E7
658F9A9D   33D2             XOR EDX,EDX
658F9A9F   B9 E8030000      MOV ECX,3E8
658F9AA4   F7F1             DIV ECX
658F9AA6   C3               RETN
658F9AA7 > 8B41 50          MOV EAX,DWORD PTR DS:[ECX+50]
658F9AAA   05 E7030000      ADD EAX,3E7
658F9AAF   33D2             XOR EDX,EDX
658F9AB1   B9 E8030000      MOV ECX,3E8
658F9AB6   F7F1             DIV ECX

658B6A82   EB 14            JMP SHORT Standard.658B6A98
...
658B7A76   EB 13            JMP SHORT Standard.658B7A8B
...
658D346B   EB 09            JMP SHORT Standard.658D3476
...
658DC259   5F               POP EDI
658DC25A   8BC6             MOV EAX,ESI
658DC25C   5E               POP ESI
658DC25D   5B               POP EBX
658DC25E   C2 1000          RETN 10
658DC261   90               NOP
658DC262   1D 450000F6      SBB EAX,F6000045
658DC267   C3               RETN
658DC268   107408 57        ADC BYTE PTR DS:[EAX+ECX+57],DH
...
658F9A98   EB 10            JMP SHORT Standard.658F9AAA
658F9A9A   B9 E8030000      MOV ECX,3E8
658F9A9F   F7F1             DIV ECX
658F9AA1   8BD3             MOV EDX,EBX
658F9AA3   5B               POP EBX
658F9AA4   90               NOP
658F9AA5   90               NOP
658F9AA6   C3               RETN
658F9AA7 > 8B41 50          MOV EAX,DWORD PTR DS:[ECX+50]
658F9AAA   53               PUSH EBX
658F9AAB   8BD8             MOV EBX,EAX
658F9AAD   05 E7030000      ADD EAX,3E7
658F9AB2   33D2             XOR EDX,EDX
658F9AB4  ^EB E4            JMP SHORT Standard.658F9A9A
658F9AB6   90               NOP
658F9AB7   90               NOP

[crespoking]

You ALL fail if you think I keylog, I dont even know how too.o.o

[chojer]

sorry for digging it myself but
maybe a little change of xml may be helpful?
dont know exactly
just a feeling that changing of xml

[[email protected]]

Okay...Well thanks for telling me it's not a xml.
Im in Standard.dll with all these fancy squiggles staring me in the face.
I look for ''aiming'' and find serveral and ''aim'' and find several again.
''SetAimingTime@ICharacter'' ''?ConvertToAIMsg@ICharacter'' and there
are quite a few of them.Wich one? Any help appreciated
Contact me if you wanna help me out:
Thanks ^ Underscore

[chojer]

1.XML has nothing to do with 100%range.
2.standard.dll.