That's right, quality. Something truly rare these days. This is more-so a rant about the current place us cheaters find ourselves in, although I am also open to checking out some EFT Cheats that might meet the mark.
I am totally fine with losing accounts, I have a few on hand alongside a private spoofer used by 4 people in total. I am more-so looking for a less public cheat, the types that can be found via a simple google search aren't exactly what I am after per-say. Bans will happen, although I see no sense in running a cheat 2,000 other's are running so it gets detected in two weeks when the files are dumped/bought by an AntiCheat Dev.
King's Choice is a shit overpriced cheat that resells Bypass for double the price. Duck's Services is decent for it's price on bypass, relatively same price as headeyes.co - In the end, they all make profit.
Basically, I know what I am looking for and I am willing to pay a price for it. Just about any price at that. If you have something that you feel like is worth mentioning or pointing out, please- Go ahead and do it, I more-so love checking out other people's work.
If you somehow sat down and looked over all this boring text and find yourself agreeing with me about the current state of bullshit pastes and re-sold/re-branded cheats, maybe chime in and start a conversation.
You just hit them right where you wanted. The last part "re-branded cheats" may hurt tons of people but you're right. Never buy rebranded/resold hacks that is being massively sold if you really want safety and I know exactly what you're looking for. However, Kinda full so i know not being helpful right now. But my dude, You're on the right path and you know what to look for. Just dont get excited without valid proofs that the hack you're currently looking at is really safe.
Educate on how BattleEye bans, it'll answer your riddle
I believe to have enough experience with BE bans, remembering even 2 months delayed ban waves I experienced with my users back in the day when I literally saw the "**** we detected" packet going out of my customers game clients and everybody wondered for weeks why the cheat was put offline but nobody got banned. I was curious too until 2 months later the mighty banwave appeared.
A really small percentage was banned, I was also writing on christmas day with someone that said the following: 'yeah idk its strange that like a lot got banned on same day all different providers ' - I do not know what providers got hit, but I heard from different people that also some spoofers got rekt.
We experienced the same a half year ago I believe where we had less customers but also on one day I believe 4-5 people got banned. Nothing was changed on the security part, if it was detected since then there would have been hella more bans.
I have to admit I can't say if some got banned due to using another provider (most of the banned users joined in December) or some spoofer (We had at least one user e.g. that was claiming to not having used a spoofer but logs say something else and I won't look over all logs) or if indeed it was our cheat due to some failure or most likely an user issue (For the ones that don't know, you must not load the cheat twice per session, it stays loaded until reboot but there are still many morons in shoutbox that wonder why the cheat does not work correctly and do that... It displays a big fat message to not do that and says it in all instructions...)
I believe to have enough experience with BE bans, remembering even 2 months delayed ban waves I experienced with my users back in the day when I literally saw the "shit we detected" packet going out of my customers game clients and everybody wondered for weeks why the cheat was put offline but nobody got banned. I was curious too until 2 months later the mighty banwave appeared.
A really small percentage was banned, I was also writing on christmas day with someone that said the following: 'yeah idk its strange that like a lot got banned on same day all different providers ' - I do not know what providers got hit, but I heard from different people that also some spoofers got rekt.
We experienced the same a half year ago I believe where we had less customers but also on one day I believe 4-5 people got banned. Nothing was changed on the security part, if it was detected since then there would have been hella more bans.
I have to admit I can't say if some got banned due to using another provider (most of the banned users joined in December) or some spoofer (We had at least one user e.g. that was claiming to not having used a spoofer but logs say something else and I won't look over all logs) or if indeed it was our cheat due to some failure or most likely an user issue (For the ones that don't know, you must not load the cheat twice per session, it stays loaded until reboot but there are still many morons in shoutbox that wonder why the cheat does not work correctly and do that... It displays a big fat message to not do that and says it in all instructions...)
It could be may well be a user issue yes.. but my point was saying S5 most likely did cause the ban due to injecting twice or whatever else.. is there no way to block them from injecting twice? Obviously people are going to be dumber and do that.. Delay bans could also be coming for your users though, BattleEye likes ban some,,, wait,, ban more (atleast for R6 BE)
Quote:
Originally Posted by unknwnx.
Undetectable XDDD. Either this tsuki provider doesn't know shit or is intentionally advertising lies. There's no undetectable software.
1000h coded? Like what customer gives a f, how long the dev needed to code the cheat? Despite that, what kind of quality goal is the time of coding?
Its an ironic take on (a joke) glad you have a high IQ though. tsuki doesnt care how their website looks, you arent getting in anyway =D
It could be may well be a user issue yes.. but my point was saying S5 most likely did cause the ban due to injecting twice or whatever else.. is there no way to block them from injecting twice? Obviously people are going to be dumber and do that.. Delay bans could also be coming for your users though, BattleEye likes ban some,,, wait,, ban more (atleast for R6 BE)
Its an ironic take on (a joke) glad you have a high IQ though. tsuki doesnt care how their website looks, you arent getting in anyway =D
You need to be vouched by and existing member of the EFT cheat, currently there are 5 users so unless you're friends with them, no.
It is strictly ONLY vouched based (basically an invite) so it doesn't matter if you have 500 rep on epvp or 1000 rep, you won't be allowed in unless vouched by a user or staff (n1ghtfall + coder).
There is no shortcuts and no ways around it, it doesn't matter who you are if you aren't vouched you aren't getting in, the dev is strict on who is allowed in and for good reason. It's UD since release and a very very good hack that focuses on security & has A lot of features compared to other hacks in similar nature.
You need to be vouched by and existing member of the EFT cheat, currently there are 5 users so unless you're friends with them, no.
It is strictly ONLY vouched based (basically an invite) so it doesn't matter if you have 500 rep on epvp or 1000 rep, you won't be allowed in unless vouched by a user or staff (n1ghtfall + coder).
There is no shortcuts and no ways around it, it doesn't matter who you are if you aren't vouched you aren't getting in, the dev is strict on who is allowed in and for good reason. It's UD since release and a very very good hack that focuses on security & has A lot of features compared to other hacks in similar nature.
Hope this answers your question.
Makes sense, thanks for fast response.
Totally understandable this situation.
Hey Gents. Anyone know how to get vouched for a chance at tsuki entry. Been on public sites for a while but $1k spent on accounts is getting up there..
Hey Gents. Anyone know how to get vouched for a chance at tsuki entry. Been on public sites for a while but $1k spent on accounts is getting up there..
Probably the best what you can do is learn c++ and kernel drivers, sadly there is only copy pastas only reachable to us.
