Botting & Cheating

[skeith_sk8]

Originally Posted by Dr.Toni.

The best way to detect it is to check how the Account moves.

But if it is full randomized, (random clicks, random timmigs and so on) its very diffcitult to detect

[Dr.Toni]

Like I said, it just depends on the code.

A good coded pixelbot is very difficult to detect.

If the bot just fly the same way it's easy.

[crazyjames]

All im doing is waiting for everything to calm down then get back to botting my noob accounts all day

[JetFusion]

Originally Posted by crazyjames

All im doing is waiting for everything to calm down then get back to botting my noob accounts all day

Waiting for what??? JUST DO IT!!
Im botting my main account but like only for 2 hours at max per day ¬¬ freaking scared. #YOLO

[cavaalb]

i don't understand why all of you says "bugpoint"...for f*** sake, it's bigpoint.
anyway, things are becoming messier by the day...so bot while you can, cause soon, pixelbots won't be safe again, like it was with packet bots

[killerrr123]

Originally Posted by cavaalb

i don't understand why all of you says "bugpoint"...for f*** sake, it's bigpoint.
anyway, things are becoming messier by the day...so bot while you can, cause soon, pixelbots won't be safe again, like it was with packet bots

pixelbots wont be safe?
like other people said before none bot is totally safe or will ever be but it just may be very very safe.Anyways i dont think that BUGpoint will ever find a way to detect every pixelbot and ban all users but this is my personal opinion.

Originally Posted by Candeeh

ti allo n kaneis me tsipra k capital controls re man

HAHAHAAHHAHAHAH XDDDDD

[～Demetrio～]

Originally Posted by killerrr123

pixelbots wont be safe?
like other people said before none bot is totally safe or will ever be but it just may be very very safe.Anyways i dont think that BUGpoint will ever find a way to detect every pixelbot and ban all users but this is my personal opinion.

Nope, bigpoint can not detect a pixel-bot immediately , as they said it takes time , but that is not a big problem, we can just change bot behavior. or change random times every update , that really will make harder to detect all bots.

The Only thing that i think BP can detect is a background click. but still there is many ways to make bots. all is about time.

[Montie84]

most were banned because of pushing .... and 24/7 Botting

[YatoDev]

Originally Posted by ～Demetrio～

The Only thing that i think BP can detect is a background click. but still there is many ways to make bots. all is about time.

no. windows messages are also pulled on a normal mouse click

[～Demetrio～]

Originally Posted by »FlutterShy™

no. windows messages are also pulled on a normal mouse click

Originally Posted by iṄk

@DemetrioAG: To answer your question: The "background-click" Method works by sending WinAPI messages to the flash/browser window.
Since you are not faking all possible WinAPI messages but just the WM_DOWN / UP / etc. ones, it could be possible to recognize for BP but at the moment I don't see code like that in the client.

....

[skeith_sk8]

Originally Posted by ～Demetrio～

....

what do you mean with background click? the clicks which make a pixel-background bot like yours or what?

[Dr.Toni]

For Background Bots you have to do it via Control Click, not via Mouse Clicks.

[Diаmonds]

Originally Posted by skeith_sk8

what do you mean with background click? the clicks which make a pixel-background bot like yours or what?

To emulate a click in the background, you can to send a "signal" to the window you want to click on using the winapi. What he's saying is that because you only send the mouse down signal (WM_LBUTTONDOWN) and not signals such as WM_MOUSEMOVE, that is triggered when the mouse moves over the window, they could try to take advantage of that to detect fake clicks. It sounds very unlikely to me, but you never know...

[YatoDev]

show me the as3 code that can access window messages. I dont think there is a 100% safe method that can target an user as a bot user