[Development] 5018 Conquer Server Source

[Korvacs]

So its just a wrapper, for queries, i would imagine that this therefore slows the query significantly for the sake of ease on the coders part....doesnt sound worth using at all tbh.

Any speed test?

[becko713]

here is my speed test
or what kind of speedtest you talk about

[Korvacs]

Originally Posted by becko713

here is my speed test
or what kind of speedtest you talk about

If you cant follow a conversation where having, dont randomly post >.<

[~Yuki~]

***** that was epic

[CptSky]

If you want the best speed, a binary file with a good structure will be faster than a MySQL database.

The only problem I see with the binary file, is that you need to make a safe reader. Else, you will try to read/write at several place in the same file and the file will be corrupted.

[_Emme_]

Originally Posted by Korvacs

So its just a wrapper, for queries, i would imagine that this therefore slows the query significantly for the sake of ease on the coders part....doesnt sound worth using at all tbh.

Speed is alot higher than flatfile for example, but all this matters to harddisk speed and/or the database software itself, so comparing speed (in this case) is not necceserry. Also, with subsonic, you have a relational database, which includes features such as primary/foreign keys, and a lot more.. So ye, I think it's worth giving Subsonic a shot. But then again, thats my opinion. If you'd like some more infomartion about Subsonic, please Google it =p

[Galactic]

IF you release your source, which I'm sure you do I think you should use FlatFile, for people who don't know much about setting up a pserver and coding, flat file is the most easiest thing to understand for them.

Maybe not the best one for more experienced people, but those people do have their own sources.

Just my opinion

[Basser]

MsSQL

[Huseby]

#Closed