[HELP]some info about some sources

taylor2846 · 01/19/2010, 05:30

ok i no this has been asked a lot but what source is most stable between the [5165],CoEmuV2[5101,5095},Cofuture[4348],CofutureReloaded [5017]
and plz tell me why it is more stable and give me some info of why it is more stable
----
and what is best mysql or .ini/.dat/.txt data files and why

please and thankyou

spare2 · 01/19/2010, 06:25

I don't think stable is a right word for comparing these sources, but I would say 5165 is the source that is used the most. (IMO)

Santa · 01/19/2010, 06:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by spare2

I don't think stable is a right word for comparing these sources, but I would say 5165 is the source that is used the most. (IMO)

Just becaue it is the most used source doesn't mean its the best.

~~pro4never~~ · 01/19/2010, 06:45

He wasn't saying it was the best. He was saying it's the most used, therefor there is the most support/releases for it currently.

Personally I'm a big fan of the 1.0 source (it's very well organized, fairly complete, not tooo many bugs and most are minor and from what I've seen it's quite stable. )

5095 CoEmu is rather stable but not much of the stuff is finished (systems and packets are missing such as guilds/trade/view gears/vending/mining/gw/pk events etc)

Lotf is very unstable, horrible organized but has tons of released stuff (usually very poorly coded making the server even less stable and worth using)

new lotf... it's better than old lotf from what I've heard but it's still not that great... bad organization, some bugs, really ****** up calculations... just not that great for the features you get. You would probably spend more time trying to correct the stuff in new lotf (assuming you can track down all the problems) than you would fixing up an earlier source that is already more organized and somewhat more stable.

As for data storage, I really have nothing against mysql, depending on how it is done: Yes it could cause some issues but I've never really had any problems with it. It's easy to do I/O from a database and personally (I have very little exp with .ini/.dat storage so correct me if I'm wrong) but you can layout your data far easier by creating new columns and changing around data types. without having to back to your data loader and completely re-write it simply because you added a new column...

Santa · 01/19/2010, 07:37

Sorry bout that, guess i misinterpreted it.

taylor2846 · 01/19/2010, 12:36

yaa i like the conquer 1.0 way more then the new stuff but i don't understand packets that well i was thanking about trying to convert that Extremely basic (but working/bugless) C# Source to a 1.0 source just to understand how to do it a bit more.. i just want good one to learn from and test coding packets and s

ok what is more stable coemu or 5165 i mean what wan can handle the most players?? ow ya what do you thank the max players is for it and for how long

Arcо · 01/22/2010, 06:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by taylor2846

ok what is more stable coemu or 5165 i mean what wan can handle the most players?? ow ya what do you thank the max players is for it and for how long

CoEmu is more stable.
If you really want a steeds server that is stable then you can try upgrading CoEmu from 5095-5156.

And it usually depends on the host.

allizzel777 · 01/22/2010, 08:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by pro4never

He wasn't saying it was the best. He was saying it's the most used, therefor there is the most support/releases for it currently.

Personally I'm a big fan of the 1.0 source (it's very well organized, fairly complete, not tooo many bugs and most are minor and from what I've seen it's quite stable. )

5095 CoEmu is rather stable but not much of the stuff is finished (systems and packets are missing such as guilds/trade/view gears/vending/mining/gw/pk events etc)

Lotf is very unstable, horrible organized but has tons of released stuff (usually very poorly coded making the server even less stable and worth using)

new lotf... it's better than old lotf from what I've heard but it's still not that great... bad organization, some bugs, really ****** up calculations... just not that great for the features you get. You would probably spend more time trying to correct the stuff in new lotf (assuming you can track down all the problems) than you would fixing up an earlier source that is already more organized and somewhat more stable.

As for data storage, I really have nothing against mysql, depending on how it is done: Yes it could cause some issues but I've never really had any problems with it. It's easy to do I/O from a database and personally (I have very little exp with .ini/.dat storage so correct me if I'm wrong) but you can layout your data far easier by creating new columns and changing around data types. without having to back to your data loader and completely re-write it simply because you added a new column...

hey can u add me on msn i think i would like you help

thank you