macewindu_jedi735: if u shoot 29 times u can SOOOO easily change that,but u dont know a **** about programming in macro express.
It took me about 20 minutes to udnerstand how to program in Macro Express,and that was yesterday.
Seriously Both of ur programs suck.
Macro Express sucks to,I rather use SCAR.
Im a good programmer in SCAR to and I would of made a SCAR bot for labb,but its kinda to late,alredy 110
What sucks about ur guys programs is that,first it didnt shoot as many times as it was supposed to,so I easily modified it to be perfect for my computer.By the way I got
IntelPentium4 3.01 Ghz.
Well so that shooting thingy I fixed,then i noticed in Lab macro 5.0 it goes way to far to the left,so u get crappy xp,i totaly prefered Skinheads or what his name is.
Then I used Skinheads instead and man I saw that it was pretty slow,like when you used Stamina fly it would wait a while then fly,then wait a little and fly,wich u could easily improve,wich I did,then i noticed it was to slow going back,I had to fix that to.
But then the biggest thing that I havent learned how to do on Macro Express and im certinley not going to learn(I prefer SCAR,Way better and more flexible)
And that thing was,sometimes when it would go back,it wouldnt go to thoose cords
What are the cords liek 216,290? i dont remember so good,last time i played was yesterday.
so ok it messed up on going back to 216,290 and that could cause luring a bit and then Dieing.
Guys i can teach u SCAR programming or u can teach urselfs,its way better.
When the original creator has alreay said this is a rip then [img]text2schild.php?smilienummer=1&text=Case is Closed' border='0' alt='Case is Closed' />
He has modified the files created by pro4never and myself, and signed it with his signature. He couldn't even write his own instructions, he just changed the name to his own. Would you trust someone who has worse grammar than my 5 year old cousin to program?
Quote:
Originally posted by Bountey@Mar 6 2006, 12:43 macewindu_jedi735: if u shoot 29 times u can SOOOO easily change that,but u dont know a shit about programming in macro express.
It took me about 20 minutes to udnerstand how to program in Macro Express,and that was yesterday.
Seriously Both of ur programs suck.
Macro Express sucks to,I rather use SCAR.
Im a good programmer in SCAR to and I would of made a SCAR bot for labb,but its kinda to late,alredy 110
What sucks about ur guys programs is that,first it didnt shoot as many times as it was supposed to,so I easily modified it to be perfect for my computer.By the way I got
IntelPentium4 3.01 Ghz.
Well so that shooting thingy I fixed,then i noticed in Lab macro 5.0 it goes way to far to the left,so u get crappy xp,i totaly prefered Skinheads or what his name is.
Then I used Skinheads instead and man I saw that it was pretty slow,like when you used Stamina fly it would wait a while then fly,then wait a little and fly,wich u could easily improve,wich I did,then i noticed it was to slow going back,I had to fix that to.
But then the biggest thing that I havent learned how to do on Macro Express and im certinley not going to learn(I prefer SCAR,Way better and more flexible)
And that thing was,sometimes when it would go back,it wouldnt go to thoose cords
What are the cords liek 216,290? i dont remember so good,last time i played was yesterday.
so ok it messed up on going back to 216,290 and that could cause luring a bit and then Dieing.
Guys i can teach u SCAR programming or u can teach urselfs,its way better.
I agree macro express is not a very good program because of it's cpu intensive requirements. I think SCAR is better, but I will be rencoding the next version to use less cpu for all the people who can't seem to read this simple line of instructions: If you're having problems with macro running slow or your PC is slow:
ctrl + alt + del - to open up task manager
right click on MacExp.exe and change priority to "above normal"
Even you Bountey.
Even is your pc is 3ghz you can still have problems with lag. I have disabled all 3d effetcs on CO and use cotobo to remove any animation except for my arrows. You need to try setting the MacExp priority to above normal. This is an obvious problem caused by pc lag. How can you call a macro for 60sec fly if your ripped macro is shorter than 60 seconds itself?
If it doesn't shoot as many times as it was supposed to, your pc is lagging, you need to change priority of MacExp. If it's flying, then waiting, then flying, AGAIN your pc is lagging.
Here I will attempt to explain for people who haven't been able to take a look at the code or don't understand what each line means. As you will see his 60sec macro doesn't even last 60 seconds in total.
The logic is simple math:
hahaha he is right, look at his ****** programming!!!
Quote:
Originally posted by Bountey@Mar 6 2006, 21:43 macewindu_jedi735: if u shoot 29 times u can SOOOO easily change that,but u dont know a **** about programming in macro express.
HAHA you can't just increase how much you shoot if you start flying back!!! hahaha what can prog4noob say now???????? he see how stupid his macro is now!!! its been proven in math!!! hahaha he should just shutup and dissapear now before he looks more stupid!!!!
OMG NOOB what r u doing ? compare ur 60sec version with my non tested 40 sec fly ? clearly that this use less time to go down and sit !
hey guys u say that his version r better ? u ever downloadet it and testet ? its dont work!
with his 3 more scatters u goes down in slingers! i reduce it a lil bit to lands savely! and my position to scatter is much better then skinheads.. i test now his version from the picture that he post, if its better (what i dont think)
i'll make again a better, but my is allready better, yeah i used 1 or 2 files from ur old script..(pro4never)
but this r this 1 picture and the readme i changed cuz it have the same features.., thats all, the other files i take it from my conquer/ ini folder !! the folder name i make let the same..!
my version works very stable and include all features, the place is better, cuz lower chance to killt from lured monster
and @ the fukin jedi ..STFU, i just tested with 60sec fly ! so i dont had a second noob archer with i can test the 40 sec fly..u ever tested the version from skinhead ? it bugged up , its really crappy!
and when ppl say that my r version just a rip.. i make a complete new one ! but its just lol to write allmost the same..
Originally posted by prog4mer+Mar 6 2006, 14:35--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (prog4mer @ Mar 6 2006, 14:35)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> hey guys u say that his version r better ? u ever downloadet it and testet ? its dont work!
with his 3 more scatters u goes down in slingers! i reduce it a lil bit to lands savely! and my position to scatter is much better then skinheads.. i test now his version from the picture that he post, if its better (what i dont think)
i'll make again a better, but my is allready better, yeah i used 1 or 2 files from ur old script..(pro4never)
but this r this 1 picture and the readme i changed cuz it have the same features.., thats all, the other files i take it from my conquer/ ini folder !! the folder name i make let the same..!
my version works very stable and include all features, the place is better, cuz lower chance to killt from lured monster
and @ the fukin jedi ..STFU, i just tested with 60sec fly ! so i dont had a second noob archer with i can test the 40 sec fly..u ever tested the version from skinhead ? it bugged up , its really crappy!
and when ppl say that my r version just a rip.. i make a complete new one ! but its just lol to write allmost the same.. [/b]
How can you or anyone say that your version works? Your macro only lasts 46.61 seconds. You would still be flying when your macro ends.
How obvioius is it that your pc is lagging? 46.61 Is no where close to a 60second fly. If you can't comprehend basic math, then go back to the 5th grade, and learn some grammar while you're at it.
There is no argument here. It has been proven already. Any further remarks will only show your ignorance for the facts right in front of you. If you don't know how to make MacExp a higher priority, don't complain that the real macro doesn't work. You can't follow simple instructions.
<!--QuoteBegin--prog4mer@Mar 6 2006, 14:43 OMG NOOB what r u doing ? compare ur 60sec version with my non tested 40 sec fly ? clearly that this use less time to go down and sit ! [/quote]
I took the information from your so called: 1024x768 60sec FLY pro (intensity lvler).mex. Which not only is NOT 60seconds but is also using the same exact naming scheme as mine. Yet another rip.
HAHAH who's the noob prog4noober? can you read??? i already said i tried your buggy macro and skankinreds, and yours doesnt work, it takes too long and doesnt shoot as much! so whos the noob now?!!
i noticed that your positions for click shoot is almost exactly the same as skankirneds!! but when i try your i dont get anywhere near the same spot!!! like bountey said!
your macro put you too far to the left!!! it suxs!!! no good exp!
i saw that picture you posted of fake macro by skankinred.. you changed the .5s to 5seconds. OMG what a loser!!! you have to lie!!! i alrdy see many people say your macro suxx, and his works fine for me
Originally posted by prog4mer@Mar 6 2006, 14:35 ...yeah i used 1 or 2 files from ur old script..(pro4never)
but this r this 1 picture and the readme i changed cuz it have the same features.., thats all, the other files i take it from my conquer/ ini folder !! the folder name i make let the same....
And yet, here's more proof that ALL you did was edit my macro and take a new screen shot. **Notice the modified dates on each of the files. Exactly the same as my macro which has even newer files then pro4never's.
Originally posted by macewindu_jedi735@Mar 7 2006, 00:01 i noticed that your positions for click shoot is almost exactly the same as skankirneds!! but when i try your i dont get anywhere near the same spot!!! like bountey said!
your macro put you too far to the left!!! it suxs!!! no good exp!
noob **** liar **** u ! stfu noob! u r used the rite position ? its not for 216.90, its for 224, 282 cuz there is lower chance that u killed by lured monsters..
I use my version, cuz that is much better! i make soon a complete new that tops all this **** and with another better macroprog! and when its rules then we will see whos macro r better ! I admit, that i not all exactly tested yet..
the best r the 1024x768 version without intensity, cuz this is optimized!
i make the macro in a half hour and i not not tested it complete cuz iam very busy!
NOOBS can use ur crappy version! download test it urself u will see it wont work at all! Pros use my version i soon up a bugfixed optimized version for 224.282 position this and later a complete new one, when skinheads again r ****!
Ohwell, my problem is that I'm thinking you can knock some sense into an idiot; which is impossible, because if you could, they wouldn't be an idiot in the first place. There's a reason why they're called an idiot to begin with:
Archer Lab Macro V5 Pro Edition 05/04/2006 - Conquer Online 2 - 3 Replies well i downloaded what was required the macro and the macro files and i followed all directions in the post and in the read me file but when i run 1024x768 40sec FLY pro (the macro file) and swithch to conquer my archer lvl 85+ only flys and sits in the same spot he woulnt move at all or scatter does anybody know why?
Thank You
