proofcore.io detection history

[ape1]

Just wondering what the detection history for proofcore.io has been. I am aware it tells you on the site just wanted to know if anyone can verify the claims. Is it really safer than something like PO based on the ID verification?

[zebleer]

The following is just my opinion

Originally Posted by ape1

Just wondering what the detection history for proofcore.io has been

They've never been detected

Originally Posted by ape1

based on the ID verification?

It isn't the ID verification. It's the impact the ID requirement has on the user base size

I've said before that size is not the only factor in security but with Ricochet it's pretty clear that if a cheat has 100 or less users (extreme case), Ricochet isn't going to do anything about it. They only go after cheats with a few hundred users or more

Sometimes cheats with less than 100 users get waved over generic anti-cheat changes (because the dev sucks) but with Proofcore that isn't a risk as the dev is very skilled

If Proofcore ever grew significantly, Ricochet would just use a fake ID or a willing contact to get access & get the job done. But IDK if that will happen because Proofcore does a good job at keeping their user base size unattractive to Ricochet and other anti-cheats

In conclusion

- Proofcore has never been detected & I wouldn't be shocked if Proofcore was never detected in the future
- The dev is good
- At the same time they are overpriced and invade their customer's privacy way too much

[Krad3z3]

Originally Posted by ape1

Just wondering what the detection history for proofcore.io has been. I am aware it tells you on the site just wanted to know if anyone can verify the claims. Is it really safer than something like PO based on the ID verification?

Zebleer provided solid insights, but I’d avoid mentioning specific userbase numbers since they can't be correct, especially in recent months with most major cheats experiencing at least one detection, some even multiple. There have also been a few exit scams lately.

I am pretty sure Proofcore has surpassed '100 users' or whatever number people make up now because cheaters are tired of paying for cheats that disappear when developer can't face detections then you also have cheats that get detected every 2-3 months (don't announce it but community always knows).

You can't go wrong with Proofcore, for sure safe solution for long term COD cheating if their external suits you and works good on your PC. Also I don't think ID verification is bad at least when it comes to proofcore. In EAC/BE games scene, there are so many shady and bad P2C doing ID verification. Valorant scene even worse. I am sure Proofcore is just fine, honest people behind the project.

^^ID verification is everyone's choice, everyone has opinion and it doesn't determine if its safe or not. Proofcore is proven to be honest, legit and good P2C with legit developers behind all projects.

[zebleer]

Originally Posted by Krad3z3

Zebleer provided solid insights, but I’d avoid mentioning specific userbase numbers since they can't be correct, especially in recent months with most major cheats experiencing at least one detection, some even multiple. There have also been a few exit scams lately.

I am pretty sure Proofcore has surpassed '100 users' or whatever number people make up now because cheaters are tired of paying for cheats that disappear when developer can't face detections then you also have cheats that get detected every 2-3 months (don't announce it but community always knows).

You can't go wrong with Proofcore, for sure safe solution for long term COD cheating if their external suits you and works good on your PC. Also I don't think ID verification is bad at least when it comes to proofcore. In EAC/BE games scene, there are so many shady and bad P2C doing ID verification. Valorant scene even worse. I am sure Proofcore is just fine, honest people behind the project.

I am just generalizing, yeah. I don't know the exact numbers

I think it would be better to just use relativity. The smallest user bases relative to others are seemingly spared as per the "100 or less" remark. Even if 100 is exceeded

That is the size factor of security. The other factors matter too

We've just seen some really small providers (seemingly a few hundred users only) get detected recently while larger providers are fine. Those are the other factors of security on display

[Krad3z3]

Originally Posted by zebleer

I am just generalizing, yeah. I don't know the exact numbers

I think it would be better to just use relativity. The smallest user bases relative to others are seemingly spared as per the "100 or less" remark. Even if 100 is exceeded

That is the size factor of security. The other factors matter too

We've just seen some really small providers (seemingly a few hundred users only) get detected recently while larger providers are fine. Those are the other factors of security on display

I agree partially but I am pretty sure those few providers that got ban waved in short time were just lucky to last that long or not that long.

Reason most of them closed project after detections too. Generic detections push 90% detections in COD scene to my knowledge and mostly pasters get affected. Not saying it won't happen to you, me or anyone else in future or soon but you can't get detected every 2-3 months and be main target to activision if you have 100-500 users. Thats low userbase.

[Krad3z3]

Originally Posted by zebleer

The "Advance" or "Advanced" cheat whatever it's called does not have good security so having a small user base did not save it. That's why I always talk about multiple factors

Proofcore has the best of both worlds. Good security and low user base. Ultimate Ricochet repellent for those willing to give their identity over

I may seem like a major Proofcore hater based on my posts but I am really just serious about privacy. Some people don't feel the same way about privacy as me. It's just my opinion

I agree with you. Giving opinion doesn't make you hater. Thats just how you see it.
Good discussion and nice to share views.

Have a good day.

[ape1]

Originally Posted by zebleer

The following is just my opinion


They've never been detected

It isn't the ID verification. It's the impact the ID requirement has on the user base size

I've said before that size is not the only factor in security but with Ricochet it's pretty clear that if a cheat has 100 or less users (extreme case), Ricochet isn't going to do anything about it. They only go after cheats with a few hundred users or more

Sometimes cheats with less than 100 users get waved over generic anti-cheat changes (because the dev sucks) but with Proofcore that isn't a risk as Darky is very skilled

If Proofcore ever grew significantly, Ricochet would just use a fake ID or a willing contact to get access & get the job done. Proofcore does make you run their HWID tool & send a video of the tool output, your face, and your ID to get a HWID reset, but Ricochet would find a way around this if they wanted to (I can think of several). But IDK if that will happen because Proofcore does a good job at keeping their user base size unattractive to Ricochet and other anti-cheats

In conclusion

- Proofcore has never been detected & I wouldn't be shocked if Proofcore was never detected in the future
- The dev is good
- At the same time they are overpriced and invade their customer's privacy way too much

I appreciate the response. I know in other games with different anti cheats lower user count usually means better security but not always. That's one of the main reasons that resold cheats get detected so frequently on top of the developer just wanting money. You start to run into a common issue with small community developers with them not being as skilled as big community developers. If a small community developer could make a cheat and mass sell it they would for the money. As for the ID verification it just adds another layer of bullshit for ricochet so I am for it.

Originally Posted by zebleer

The following is just my opinion


They've never been detected

It isn't the ID verification. It's the impact the ID requirement has on the user base size

I've said before that size is not the only factor in security but with Ricochet it's pretty clear that if a cheat has 100 or less users (extreme case), Ricochet isn't going to do anything about it. They only go after cheats with a few hundred users or more

Sometimes cheats with less than 100 users get waved over generic anti-cheat changes (because the dev sucks) but with Proofcore that isn't a risk as Darky is very skilled

If Proofcore ever grew significantly, Ricochet would just use a fake ID or a willing contact to get access & get the job done. Proofcore does make you run their HWID tool & send a video of the tool output, your face, and your ID to get a HWID reset, but Ricochet would find a way around this if they wanted to (I can think of several). But IDK if that will happen because Proofcore does a good job at keeping their user base size unattractive to Ricochet and other anti-cheats

In conclusion

- Proofcore has never been detected & I wouldn't be shocked if Proofcore was never detected in the future
- The dev is good
- At the same time they are overpriced and invade their customer's privacy way too much

Oddly enough it says on the website there MW3 cheat was detected in October 2023.

[zebleer]

Originally Posted by ape1

Oddly enough it says on the website there MW3 cheat was detected in October 2023.

None of their COD have ever been detected. I think you are reading their Status page format incorrectly

[gosz2]

Originally Posted by zebleer

None of their COD have ever been detected. I think you are reading their Status page format incorrectly

MR GOSZ AND ZEEBLER ON TOP OF THE WORLD RANKED

[perseveranza]

Originally Posted by zebleer

The "Advance" or "Advanced" cheat whatever it's called does not have good security so having a small user base did not save it. That's why I always talk about multiple factors

Apparently, Advance had 1000+ CoD users last month as the dev said in his discord. They resell it a ton especially in russia and in various discords (here on epvp tim073 is reselling it at more than x2 the price, cringe) and they added chinese support as well, you know what that means.

Now the fun part: A decent amount of people started getting banned in BO6 beta almost a week before the MW3 wave and warned the dev, but he was stubborn and kept saying that his product was UD and blamed "false bans" (he recently said that advance would never be dt on cod, his ego blinded him probably), a few days later people started receiving bans in MW3 as well and after the initial scepticism, he finally marked the product as "updating/use at own risk" (lol) and made an announcement about the detection WAY TOO LATE.

His BF2042 cheat got DT twice in a span of weeks. The excuse here is that EA is targeting them, Battlefield is a dead game & EA never chased providers so much, so I struggle to believe it. Sounds like the devs are very cocky and always talk about pasters but they aren't very careful either & resell a ton. Lately, they constantly wiped their discord chats, maybe because there was some criticism. The price is super cheap but you get what you pay for basically. They have many features but the security is not their top priority, they just want to resell and make money.

I bought 1 week key from them and i can safely say that was the last time, i've seen enough.
The icing on the cake was the toxic discord & community they have.

The real options for CoD are PO and, if you are not concerned with your privacy, Proofcore.
Personally, I will never share my ID with strangers. Maybe I'm too paranoid but better safe than sorry.

[ITAVB]

For me the best COD cheat was IW unfortunately they received a warning from Activision, now it's just PO I just don't like their ESP which is buggy for me, I'm saying to myself I don't know if it's because I use an ultrawide 34p monitor but I think they could improve that part. but other than that I only recommend PO you won't be disappointed.

[Krad3z3]

Originally Posted by ITAVB

For me the best COD cheat was IW unfortunately they received a warning from Activision, now it's just PO I just don't like their ESP which is buggy for me, I'm saying to myself I don't know if it's because I use an ultrawide 34p monitor but I think they could improve that part. but other than that I only recommend PO you won't be disappointed.

No hard feelings but this is not PO sales thread or question about PO. OP is asking about Proofcore only. Not about cheat recommendations. If you have review for PO put it on his sales thread.

Pretty sure he got information he needed from me and Zebleer.

Originally Posted by perseveranza

Not professional, unreliable & his discord/community are toxic af, it's a pass for me.

Same for this one, thread is not about Advance or their detections. If you have review for his cheat and support just put it on his thread with proof of purchase.

[perseveranza]

Originally Posted by Krad3z3

No hard feelings but this is not PO sales thread or question about PO. OP is asking about Proofcore only. Not about cheat recommendations. If you have review for PO put it on his sales thread.

Pretty sure he got information he needed from me and Zebleer.



Same for this one, thread is not about Advance or their detections. If you have review for his cheat and support just put it on his thread with proof of purchase.

If you're choosing a provider it's inevitable to compare it to others, advance got mentioned and I explained my experience and then said my thoughts about proofcore, which are positive except the ID requirement.
You don't know if OP would appreciate more infos about providers or not & I am free to answer as long as the thread is open. Maybe he's gonna dodge a bullet thanks to some more infos.

[000xx9]

Originally Posted by ape1

Just wondering what the detection history for proofcore.io has been. I am aware it tells you on the site just wanted to know if anyone can verify the claims. Is it really safer than something like PO based on the ID verification?

Proofcore is top notch security. ID verification isn't that serious tbh you can request from @ to delete all personal info after you got approved.
Everyone in the group likes the verification and it keeps the userbase so small you see only the same people every day in Discord.
Never detected on COD and years UD on EAC/BE games. Price is a bit expensive for COD 55€ with Card / 50€ Cryptpo but yeah people who really care about their mains use them. Overall nice community.

[ape1]

Originally Posted by zebleer

None of their COD have ever been detected. I think you are reading their Status page format incorrectly

Yes they most likely set last detection to the time it was released roughly October 2023.