SPOOFER

[zCandy]

Hey guys,

im looking for a good and safe way to play legit again ( only walls )

Im HWID banned, im currently looking for a spoof

the options i see.

ACD spoof
XNOR ( PERM SPOOF )
GA
and PO

i want the safest one, can you guys help me which one would do me best.

thanks!

[b0redrager]

GA for temp spoofing and xnor for permanent, rest of the spoofers have been having alot of issues recently

[dcypl_shock]

GA on top

[bushman26]

For spoofer definitely GA
Using them too and their insane with the spoofer and the amount of games supported

[zCandy]

Originally Posted by b0redrager

GA for temp spoofing and xnor for permanent, rest of the spoofers have been having alot of issues recently

I really don’t know which one to do

Xnor or edgey.

Or just GA

[bushman26]

If your gonna cheat again even if you just use walls

Get Ghostaim spoofer

Id your going fully legit edgey is your best option right now

[0x41^4]

PO's spoofer is the best on the market.
It's the easiest to use and the least invasive on your PC.
No need to reinstall windows, cod, nor use secondary users.

[b0redrager]

Originally Posted by 0x41^4

PO's spoofer is the best on the market.
It's the easiest to use and the least invasive on your PC.
No need to reinstall windows, cod, nor use secondary users.

i like zeb and PO but this is just not true lol PO is always having spoofer problems they have been "outdated" what 4 times in the past few months? and you're saying its the best on the market... its not even available for purchasing right now

[Light__]

I would personally recommend Xnor as he is a friend of mine and has always worked for me. He goes through and does everything manually so there is 0 chance of you getting banned and if for some reason it doesn't work on your pc you will receive a refund.

[0x41^4]

Originally Posted by b0redrager

i like zeb and PO but this is just not true lol PO is always having spoofer problems they have been "outdated" what 4 times in the past few months? and you're saying its the best on the market... its not even available for purchasing right now

PO's spoofer becomes disabled when Activision pushes security changes which is why it works 100% of every shadow ban while other spoofers sometimes work.

The spoofer is attentively maintained as much as the cheat is, thus why it doesn't cause userbase bans (as so many spoofers have in the past) due to a failure to identify and bypass security changes.

Ultimately, this is why so many users trust and use PO on their main accounts instead of other providers, as well as why Zebleer recommends other products to those who rage nor care about preserving file integrity.

[b0redrager]

Originally Posted by 0x41^4

PO's spoofer becomes disabled when Activision pushes security changes which is why it works 100% of every shadow ban while other spoofers sometimes work.

The spoofer is attentively maintained as much as the cheat is, thus why it doesn't cause userbase bans (as so many spoofers have in the past) due to a failure to identify and bypass security changes.

Ultimately, this is why so many users trust and use PO on their main accounts instead of other providers, as well as why Zebleer recommends other products to those who rage nor care about preserving file integrity.

lol okay just ignore everyone who reports bans after the spoofer gets outdated sure, we're talking about the spoofer here not the cheat.

[SonGoku009]

Nr 1 spoofer on the market is Artificialaiming.net.

You should give it a try since it's inclusive and doesn't cost you extra.

[zebleer]

@b0redrager I think PO and GA spoofer are hard to compare because there are different pros and cons.

GA spoofer does have an unwanted reboot issue on the first spoof of a pin, has BSOD issues, requires secure boot off, requires HyperV and virtualization on, isn't compatible with most other cheats. It's also very invasive it's a spoof reboot boot loader, basically a root kit. I will null that last point for the manjority of people with brain cells who should understand that Laz is to be trusted. It also requires a new Windows user and I believe a format (I will double check about the format).

PO has been outdated more than GA, but has none of those above issues or requirements. Secure boot on is fine. HyperV and virtualization off is fine. No BSOD or unwanted reboot issues. Just run and play. No need to format Windows or make a new Windows user or delete any files or do anything other than run and play. Also it's compatible with every cheat and even other spoofers. Not invasive at all which again doesn't really matter here since I think GA is trustworthy.

You should understand that PO spoofer is not a money grab for me or my main product. My main product are my cheats (which have never been detected) and my spoofer was just a way to make those cheats more accessible to users coming from providers that got them HWID banned. That's all.

I personally recommend GA spoofer to customers who have a problem with mine. All they have to do is spoof with GA then use the same pin and cheat HWID reset via a ticket with us to lock to that pin then keep using the same pin. It's whatever works for them. It's a little more tedious since PO spoofer and PO cheat loader work together so they don't need a HWID reset on new spoofs and such but if they want to use GA, it'll work.

Let's stop the GA vs PO spoofer battle before it gets started. I don't care which people use. I am going to be transparent about the pros and cons of each and at the end of the day all that matters to me is that people who want to use my cheats can do that. I don't care what spoofer they use.

Also @b0redrager one more thing I want to mention is that people aren't mass reporting bans after my spoofer becomes outdated. I disable the spoofer so quickly and am really on the ball with it. Also other than the one in April, the few SB reported did get lifted. I am talking like 5 or so per outdate. I will just to be more on the ball but with how Ricochet works it's not as harmful to get outdated as it sounds.

Originally Posted by b0redrager

i like zeb and PO but this is just not true lol PO is always having spoofer problems they have been "outdated" what 4 times in the past few months? and you're saying its the best on the market... its not even available for purchasing right now

Not 4 times. Also I don't know why use use outdated in quotes. IDK if you realize but Laz also uses that term too because it's the correct term to use when the spoofer becomes outdated compared to what the anti-cheat is grabbing & how. Detected would be if the spoofer was directly detected by the anti-cheat in that the anti-cheat can tell a user used a spoofer. With outdated it just doesn't protect HWID banned devices until the spoofer is updated.

[dcypl_shock]

Originally Posted by zebleer

@ I think PO and GA spoofer are hard to compare because there are different pros and cons.

GA spoofer does have an unwanted reboot issue on the first spoof of a pin, has BSOD issues, requires secure boot off, requires HyperV and virtualization on, isn't compatible with most other cheats. It's also very invasive it's a spoof reboot boot loader, basically a root kit. I will null that last point for the manjority of people with brain cells who should understand that Laz is to be trusted. It also requires a new Windows user and I believe a format (I will double check about the format).

PO has been outdated more than GA, but has none of those above issues or requirements. Secure boot on is fine. HyperV and virtualization off is fine. No BSOD or unwanted reboot issues. Just run and play. No need to format Windows or make a new Windows user or delete any files or do anything other than run and play. Also it's compatible with every cheat and even other spoofers. Not invasive at all which again doesn't really matter here since I think GA is trustworthy.

You should understand that PO spoofer is not a money grab for me or my main product. My main product are my cheats (which have never been detected) and my spoofer was just a way to make those cheats more accessible to users coming from providers that got them HWID banned. That's all.

I personally recommend GA spoofer to customers who have a problem with mine. All they have to do is spoof with GA then use the same pin and cheat HWID reset via a ticket with us to lock to that pin then keep using the same pin. It's whatever works for them. It's a little more tedious since PO spoofer and PO cheat loader work together so they don't need a HWID reset on new spoofs and such but if they want to use GA, it'll work.

Let's stop the GA vs PO spoofer battle before it gets started. I don't care which people use. I am going to be transparent about the pros and cons of each and at the end of the day all that matters to me is that people who want to use my cheats can do that. I don't care what spoofer they use.

Also @ one more thing I want to mention is that people aren't mass reporting bans after my spoofer becomes outdated. I disable the spoofer so quickly and am really on the ball with it. Also other than the one in April, the few SB reported did get lifted. I am talking like 5 or so per outdate. I will just to be more on the ball but with how Ricochet works it's not as harmful to get outdated as it sounds.


Not 4 times. Also I don't know why use use outdated in quotes. IDK if you realize but Laz also uses that term too because it's the correct term to use when the spoofer becomes outdated compared to what the anti-cheat is grabbing & how. Detected would be if the spoofer was directly detected by the anti-cheat in that the anti-cheat can tell a user used a spoofer. With outdated it just doesn't protect HWID banned devices until the spoofer is updated.

to answer the things you were unsure about.. Ghostaim does require you to boot in UEFI mode requiring GPT format, but there is a tool that they provide which requires no reinstallation of windows and reformats your drives. a few things is that yes, you have to enable hyper-v and virtualization which results in about a 10 fps loss but its definitely worth it considering they haven't been outdated or detected in the 6 months that they have had the bootloader implemented.

A few things with PO, the spoofer isn't actually "spoofing" anything, it "spoofs" whenever the game requests its not actually spoofing its acting as an interception. the reason PO spoofer gets outdated is because the game updates the way they grab hwid making PO spoofer not work properly what zeb should do is disable the spoofer every time there is a game update and update it himself and then release the spoofer back up. also of course the PO hwid checker is going to show it as spoofing your hardware because they made it lol they can make that say whatever they want use any other hwid checker and you'll realize nothing is actually changing.

Also Zeb could you comment on the MI situation? you vouched for MI with your life saying that you knew the dev well and gave them tips but all skippy did is sell the cheat, he had no involvement in developing the cheat, maybe gave some ideas to the actual dev on how to make the menu lol, also I believe you said you had the source code and you gave tips based on this (I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure I remember you saying this) all skippy was is a seller he isn't an actual dev. all the dev of MI did was reskin ACD not changing any injectors or drivers its all the same (when I refer to ACD I mean the entire bunch of reskins etc a few of these are GCAIMX VIGILANT RAGE4FUN there are plenty more just don't feel like listing it all). proof of this is if you take a key from ACD and load up the MI loader and paste ur key in it will load up ACD no problem, same with all the other rebrands/reskins of golden gun, also you can look at the loot esp and esp design, its the exact same as ACD the color of the loot esp is the same as the color of ACD the aimbot is identical to acd's etc. and also anyone notice how MI got detected the same day PO spoofer got released? coincident I think not. here is proof of the key working on ACD loader and the basic loader for the reskins without any "customization"

[b0redrager]

Originally Posted by zebleer

@ I think PO and GA spoofer are hard to compare because there are different pros and cons.

GA spoofer does have an unwanted reboot issue on the first spoof of a pin, has BSOD issues, requires secure boot off, requires HyperV and virtualization on, isn't compatible with most other cheats. It's also very invasive it's a spoof reboot boot loader, basically a root kit. I will null that last point for the manjority of people with brain cells who should understand that Laz is to be trusted. It also requires a new Windows user and I believe a format (I will double check about the format).

PO has been outdated more than GA, but has none of those above issues or requirements. Secure boot on is fine. HyperV and virtualization off is fine. No BSOD or unwanted reboot issues. Just run and play. No need to format Windows or make a new Windows user or delete any files or do anything other than run and play. Also it's compatible with every cheat and even other spoofers. Not invasive at all which again doesn't really matter here since I think GA is trustworthy.

You should understand that PO spoofer is not a money grab for me or my main product. My main product are my cheats (which have never been detected) and my spoofer was just a way to make those cheats more accessible to users coming from providers that got them HWID banned. That's all.

I personally recommend GA spoofer to customers who have a problem with mine. All they have to do is spoof with GA then use the same pin and cheat HWID reset via a ticket with us to lock to that pin then keep using the same pin. It's whatever works for them. It's a little more tedious since PO spoofer and PO cheat loader work together so they don't need a HWID reset on new spoofs and such but if they want to use GA, it'll work.

Let's stop the GA vs PO spoofer battle before it gets started. I don't care which people use. I am going to be transparent about the pros and cons of each and at the end of the day all that matters to me is that people who want to use my cheats can do that. I don't care what spoofer they use.

Also @ one more thing I want to mention is that people aren't mass reporting bans after my spoofer becomes outdated. I disable the spoofer so quickly and am really on the ball with it. Also other than the one in April, the few SB reported did get lifted. I am talking like 5 or so per outdate. I will just to be more on the ball but with how Ricochet works it's not as harmful to get outdated as it sounds.


Not 4 times. Also I don't know why use use outdated in quotes. IDK if you realize but Laz also uses that term too because it's the correct term to use when the spoofer becomes outdated compared to what the anti-cheat is grabbing & how. Detected would be if the spoofer was directly detected by the anti-cheat in that the anti-cheat can tell a user used a spoofer. With outdated it just doesn't protect HWID banned devices until the spoofer is updated.

thanks for clearing things up zeb, like i said i have no problems with PO but what 0x41^4 said just ignored everything what has been recently happening and making out that everything is perfect, although i do now use GA spoofer (i now like to have the choice to use different pin/hwid ids for each account) i do hope PO spoofer does stay above of ricoshit in future