Valorant emulator

[Aventus.pub]

Hello guys

Do you think 250$ is a fair price for an emulator that bypasses hwid ban
And makes sure the only way you can get banned while cheating is through a manual ban?

Or should I lower the price to 200$?

I personally feel like 250$ is fair because of the fact u bypass hwid ban and get to use any cheat

[VGK.RIP]

Definitely not worth it. This “emulator” is already out there for free on GitHub/UC, and you don't get hit only by manuals, it’s fully detected with delayed bans.

Vanguard still has internal anti-cheat components that can’t be virtualized, so it flags missing Vanguard threads or known public internals that are already detected.

They delay bans because insta-banning would be messy and cause false positives for legit users with Vanguard issues, so they wait for multiple games and reports before dropping the ban.

This has been around since 2021, they could’ve patched it if they really cared, but clearly it’s not a priority for them.

Stop hyping this like it’s some super tech or “undetected.”

[Aventus.pub]

Originally Posted by VGK.RIP

Definitely not worth it. This “emulator” is already out there for free on GitHub/UC, and you don't get hit only by manuals, it’s fully detected with delayed bans.

Vanguard still has internal anti-cheat components that can’t be virtualized, so it flags missing Vanguard threads or known public internals that are already detected.

They delay bans because insta-banning would be messy and cause false positives for legit users with Vanguard issues, so they wait for multiple games and reports before dropping the ban.

This has been around since 2021, they could’ve patched it if they really cared, but clearly it’s not a priority for them.

Stop hyping this like it’s some super tech or “undetected.”

There is also public external cheats does that now make them all the same?

there is cheats that can cause literally the same outcome that you just described, it all comes down to how well they are made, sloppy stuff exists everywhere

[VGK.RIP]

Originally Posted by Aventus.pub

There is also public external cheats does that now make them all the same?

there is cheats that can cause literally the same outcome that you just described, it all comes down to how well they are made, sloppy stuff exists everywhere

Anything that crashes or freezes Vanguard threads and lets you run the game “without Vanguard” or "bypass restrictions/HWID" is basically the same, with almost no real differences other than Brand/Loader/Driver.

They’re detected even in League of Legends, which wasn’t even built around Vanguard and doesn’t have the same internal AC. That just shows how fragile it is. Maybe it worked in the past before the leak, but nowadays definitely not.

[Aventus.pub]

Originally Posted by VGK.RIP

Anything that crashes or freezes Vanguard threads and lets you run the game “without Vanguard” or "bypass restrictions/HWID" is basically the same, with almost no real differences other than Brand/Loader/Driver.

They’re detected even in League of Legends, which wasn’t even built around Vanguard and doesn’t have the same internal AC. That just shows how fragile it is. Maybe it worked in the past before the leak, but nowadays definitely not.

You are talking about the same loophole of pastes, this is not the same

[VGK.RIP]

Originally Posted by Aventus.pub

You are talking about the same loophole of pastes, this is not the same

I’m pretty sure you’re not actually virtualizing Vanguard. Anyone who could do that wouldn’t be selling it as a $250 P2C.

At the end of the day, it’s basically the same thing with slight differences in how it’s done, but nothing that changes the core factors. I’m not gonna keep arguing, but I’m speaking as a dev, and you said it’s your friend doing it, so yeah, I know what I’m talking about.

Still the best option for anyone who just wants to rage. you should target those customers instead of just closest-player, it’d make people happier and probably bring you more sales.

[Aventus.pub]

Originally Posted by VGK.RIP

I’m pretty sure you’re not actually virtualizing Vanguard. Anyone who could do that wouldn’t be selling it as a $250 P2C.

At the end of the day, it’s basically the same thing with slight differences in how it’s done, but nothing that changes the core factors. I’m not gonna keep arguing, but I’m speaking as a dev, and you said it’s your friend doing it, so yeah, I know what I’m talking about.

Still the best option for anyone who just wants to rage. you should target those customers instead of just closest-player, it’d make people happier and probably bring you more sales.

This is like saying all drivers are the same with slight differences and same with other external cheats out there? Which is literally what the market looks like? Delay bans with false lies about manual ban, that’s not a reliable option compared to an emulator, an emulator needs to be patched by a riot dev for it to stop work or for you to get banned, quite literally.

[VGK.RIP]

Originally Posted by Aventus.pub

This is like saying all drivers are the same with slight differences and same with other external cheats out there? Which is literally what the market looks like? Delay bans with false lies about manual ban, that’s not a reliable option compared to an emulator, an emulator needs to be patched by a riot dev for it to stop work or for you to get banned, quite literally.

That comparison doesn’t make sense. Drivers can be completely different, hypervisor, kernel, ring, EFI, all with different behavior. Externals also vary a lot, different overlays, loaders, auth systems, aimbot methods, memory read and write.

A better example is overlays like Medal.tv. No matter how it’s done, you’re still hooking the same thing, so if Riot detects Medal itself, everyone using it gets hit.

Drivers are not the same at all. Yours can be different, but you’re just crashing a Vanguard thread. That’s not the same as emulating or virtualizing it. And honestly, you’re talking like a dev when you’re not.

“Emulators need to be patched by a Riot dev” makes no sense. You’re not emulating Vanguard, you’re just crashing a thread, totally different concepts.

On your own thread, show this as proof. This is the VGC service, just the usermode part of Vanguard. VGK is still running the kernel side and the internal AC, so you’re clearly not emulating anything.

You’re just crashing the VGC service and spawning a fake process to “bypass” the heartbeat. The game still runs, but that fake process doesn’t have the proper communication, so Valorant can easily tell it’s fake since the internal AC or VGK isn’t receiving the expected data. It’s obviously detected.

And you’re claiming this needs a Riot dev to patch and that it’s “fully undetected” unless manual? That’s just not true, that works since BETA and it's DETECTED with delay bans to don't make FP's bans on players that really run into issues with Vanguard.

“Delaying bans with false manual ban claims” is exactly what you’re doing, spamming threads and flexing fake emulators you can find on UC or GitHub.

If people are interested, I can even make one and release it for free, plus drop a basic cheat with updated offsets so people can use it until it gets patched instead of paying for this.

[Aventus.pub]

Originally Posted by VGK.RIP

That comparison doesn’t make sense. Drivers can be completely different, hypervisor, kernel, ring, EFI, all with different behavior. Externals also vary a lot, different overlays, loaders, auth systems, aimbot methods, memory read and write.

A better example is overlays like Medal.tv. No matter how it’s done, you’re still hooking the same thing, so if Riot detects Medal itself, everyone using it gets hit.

Drivers are not the same at all. Yours can be different, but you’re just crashing a Vanguard thread. That’s not the same as emulating or virtualizing it. And honestly, you’re talking like a dev when you’re not.

“Emulators need to be patched by a Riot dev” makes no sense. You’re not emulating Vanguard, you’re just crashing a thread, totally different concepts.

“Delaying bans with false manual ban claims” is exactly what you’re doing, spamming threads and flexing fake emulators you can find on UC or GitHub.

If people are interested, I can even make one and release it for free, plus drop a basic cheat with updated offsets so people can use it until it gets patched instead of paying for this.

Go ahead, I would like to see you try

[VGK.RIP]

Originally Posted by Aventus.pub

Go ahead, I would like to see you try

If you search “Vanguard emulator UC/GitHub” on Google, you’ll find a lot of the same stuff you’re selling, and it’s free.

Or you can prove me wrong and shut me up. Show proof you actually decoded Vanguard and are emulating VGC, VGK, and the internal AC with proper fake logs to stay undetected.

If someone really had that, they wouldn’t be selling it as a P2C. It would get patched fast, and Riot would easily pay 500k to 1M for that kind of source.

[Aventus.pub]

Originally Posted by VGK.RIP

If you search “Vanguard emulator UC/GitHub” on Google, you’ll find a lot of the same stuff you’re selling, and it’s free.

Or you can prove me wrong and shut me up. Show proof you actually decoded Vanguard and are emulating VGC, VGK, and the internal AC with proper fake logs to stay undetected.

If someone really had that, they wouldn’t be selling it as a P2C. It would get patched fast, and Riot would easily pay 500k to 1M for that kind of source.

Okay so, I can also make a valorant cheat because I can easily google valorant cheats and find sources on UC?


what type of logic are you applying here? Let me see you make a vanguard emulator that disables VGC and can bypass hwid ban and can let you play the game in peace without any temporary bans or mid game
Connection errors.

Originally Posted by VGK.RIP

That comparison doesn’t make sense. Drivers can be completely different, hypervisor, kernel, ring, EFI, all with different behavior. Externals also vary a lot, different overlays, loaders, auth systems, aimbot methods, memory read and write.

A better example is overlays like Medal.tv. No matter how it’s done, you’re still hooking the same thing, so if Riot detects Medal itself, everyone using it gets hit.

Drivers are not the same at all. Yours can be different, but you’re just crashing a Vanguard thread. That’s not the same as emulating or virtualizing it. And honestly, you’re talking like a dev when you’re not.

“Emulators need to be patched by a Riot dev” makes no sense. You’re not emulating Vanguard, you’re just crashing a thread, totally different concepts.

On your own thread, show this as proof. This is the VGC service, just the usermode part of Vanguard. VGK is still running the kernel side and the internal AC, so you’re clearly not emulating anything.

You’re just crashing the VGC service and spawning a fake process to “bypass” the heartbeat. The game still runs, but that fake process doesn’t have the proper communication, so Valorant can easily tell it’s fake since the internal AC or VGK isn’t receiving the expected data. It’s obviously detected.

And you’re claiming this needs a Riot dev to patch and that it’s “fully undetected” unless manual? That’s just not true, that works since BETA and it's DETECTED with delay bans to don't make FP's bans on players that really run into issues with Vanguard.

“Delaying bans with false manual ban claims” is exactly what you’re doing, spamming threads and flexing fake emulators you can find on UC or GitHub.

If people are interested, I can even make one and release it for free, plus drop a basic cheat with updated offsets so people can use it until it gets patched instead of paying for this.

There is no such thing as delaybans with this unless you talk about the free ones you have used and probably never had a good try with lol

[VGK.RIP]

Originally Posted by Aventus.pub

Okay so, I can also make a valorant cheat because I can easily google valorant cheats and find sources on UC?


what type of logic are you applying here? Let me see you make a vanguard emulator that disables VGC and can bypass hwid ban and can let you play the game in peace without any temporary bans or mid game
Connection errors.



There is no such thing as delaybans with this unless you talk about the free ones you have used and probably never had a good try with lol

You clearly don’t know what you’re talking about. I explained it in detail and you still make weird comparisons. A full cheat is completely different from pasting a hook or pipeline.

I don’t even need to make one, there are free versions out there. No idea why you’re flexing this like it’s some high level tech.

“There is no such thing as delaybans”. Vanguard isn’t VAC. You’re just crashing the VGC service and cloning it to keep the heartbeat alive, and calling that undetected, even without touching the main module, which is VGK in kernel.

I didn’t “try”, I’m a dev and I know what I’m talking about. You don’t have an emulator, you just crash and clone a service. That’s literally what you’re selling for 250 a month. If you read UC threads, people are making fun of it because that’s the limit of what it does.

[Aventus.pub]

Originally Posted by VGK.RIP

You clearly don’t know what you’re talking about. I explained it in detail and you still make weird comparisons. A full cheat is completely different from pasting a hook or pipeline.

I don’t even need to make one, there are free versions out there. No idea why you’re flexing this like it’s some high level tech.

“There is no such thing as delaybans”. Vanguard isn’t VAC. You’re just crashing the VGC service and cloning it to keep the heartbeat alive, and calling that undetected, even without touching the main module, which is VGK in kernel.

I didn’t “try”, I’m a dev and I know what I’m talking about. You don’t have an emulator, you just crash and clone a service. That’s literally what you’re selling for 250 a month. If you read UC threads, people are making fun of it because that’s the limit of what it does.

You keep mentioning free ”versions” of whatever I’m offering, and I keep telling you to test them so you can stop this comparison as soon as possible thanks

“There is no such thing as delaybans”. Vanguard isn’t VAC. You’re just crashing the VGC service and cloning it to keep the heartbeat alive, and calling that undetected, even without touching the main module, which is VGK in kernel"





like i said, please stop.

[Tofugod]

Aventus.pub is really so fuggin stupid, like bruh even i a non developer understood what he was talking about, theres no way to emulate Vanguard unless youre like *** or something, and vgk.rip is right, instead of selling fro 250$ a month just sell to riot theyll easily give a Mill for smth like this

[Aventus.pub]

Originally Posted by Tofugod

Aventus.pub is really so fuggin stupid, like bruh even i a non developer understood what he was talking about, theres no way to emulate Vanguard unless youre like *** or something, and vgk.rip is right, instead of selling fro 250$ a month just sell to riot theyll easily give a Mill for smth like this

VGC AND VGK is off, he is completely wrong.

He claimed that what I have is public and does not even shut down VGK…

Don’t call me stupid again without saying something useful it only makes yourself look stupid and nobody else