COtobo poll #2 - Limit maximal number of clients

chocoman4k · 02/19/2006, 13:16

The question says it all, vote above.

mummies24 · 02/19/2006, 15:04

Nice results!

~~Nx²~~ · 02/19/2006, 15:12

wasn das hier Oo

Fierce · 02/19/2006, 15:57

In my mind, there's no need to limit because it's up to the user to use how many client he wants.
Plus, I think, like co client, some people with good programming knowledge will try to crack it. TQ does limit max client at 2 but that's not really a big deal, lot of people running more than 2 client. For example, us and a conquer's official forum moderator (that i know and she told me

).
And if some tried to crack your program, i doubt they will put any credits about the original programmer of this tool.

Well, that's what I think

compwiz · 02/19/2006, 17:20

If theres no limit gems will pretty much be worthless in a months time.

devilsiao · 02/19/2006, 17:42

voted no. because if peoples cares so much about markets economy and such. they shouldnt be using any Copather and Cotobo. right? simple enough. play it the "right way" dont use marcro or anything... why bother to visit EVP?..

Just my reason for voting no. cheers

(GAME)Master · 02/19/2006, 17:46

I voted no cotobo should be limited I dont think to just 2-8 clients or what ever the poll #'s were exactly
but u figure when u hex edit ur co.exe u can only run about 10 clients at once without errors................

Quote:

If theres no limit gems will pretty much be worthless in a months time.

figure fury gems I sell for 10 million each and I dont think the price will drop on em because of ppl having alot of miners...
but than again if ppl dont keep rbing chars there wont be much of a need for em.

S.O · 02/19/2006, 18:13

Quote:

Originally posted by (GAME)Master@Feb 19 2006, 17:46
I voted no cotobo should be limited I dont think to just 2-8 clients or what ever the poll #'s were exactly
but u figure when u hex edit ur co.exe u can only run about 10 clients at once without errors................

Quote:

If theres no limit gems will pretty much be worthless in a months time.

figure fury gems I sell for 10 million each and I dont think the price will drop on em because of ppl having alot of miners...
but than again if ppl dont keep rbing chars there wont be much of a need for em.

ummm, i donno what ur pc is... but my pc can hold over 20 co clients and i can still play.... though i get directx errors sometimes - and need to reset to fix that

anyhow - i know well enough not to totally abuse cotobo... besides the fact that TC mines is where the real money is - and there - everyone is going bluename just to kick cotobo users out

Edit: Voted no. bcoz i dont use cotobo just for mining - and I use the multiclient thing alot

anticlownn · 02/19/2006, 18:31

no, who cares about the economy, I don't see any difference anyway

tsu · 02/19/2006, 18:42

Quote:

Originally posted by anticlownn@Feb 19 2006, 18:31
no, who cares about the economy, I don't see any difference anyway

signed

tiger_yamilov · 02/19/2006, 18:44

I voted to limit the cotobo for 4 clients.

It is a VERY useful programm, but just like many lev 2 and 3 users are not giving information about how to buy from market, without actually paying for the items, i think that cotobo should also be available for the privilidged. And i am not saying that i am one of them.

I started usind eplvlers couple of weeks ago, and since cotobo came out, prices of normal gems have dropped almost twice!! Therefore people who dont use anu macros or bots, which in my opinion is more then half, are put in a very disadvantagouse position.

And those of you who are saying, "who cares about the games economy" definatly should not be allowed to use anu bots!!! But this is just my opinion.

magic02 · 02/19/2006, 18:52

i didnt vote but i would say 4-6 should be the limit. Now days i cant even play without getting d/c every 5 mins because of so many ppl on.

[img]text2schild.php?smilienummer=1&text=Edit: not fair for some ppl to not be able to play because some others have over 6 accs logged. ' border='0' alt='Edit: not fair for some ppl to not be able to play because some others have over 6 accs logged. ' />

shadowkiller · 02/19/2006, 21:59

I voted to limit tobo. When the prices on ref gems have dropped between 2-4 mil, you know something is not right.

chocoman4k · 02/19/2006, 22:43

41% -> Yes
59% -> No

Close race :P

skankinred · 02/20/2006, 06:04

Quote:

Originally posted by devilsiao@Feb 19 2006, 08:42
voted no. because if peoples cares so much about markets economy and such. they shouldnt be using any Copather and Cotobo. right? simple enough. play it the "right way" dont use marcro or anything... why bother to visit EVP?..

Just my reason for voting no. cheers

I 2nd that. Either play "the EPVP way" or play the "normal" way.
I also use cotobo on other chars even when not mining. It has many useful features besides mining.

I have feeling a majority of the people who are voting 2,4,8 are just doing it because their computer limits them to this many. They don't want anybody else to run more, so they wouldn't have a greater advantage over them.