i could give a fuck less if you think it is immature, i care more about peoples experience and safety than copy pasters putting users at jeopardy, lying about it, then trying to cover their ass. take it to pm and quit spamming my wall with bullshit.

thats a massive overstatement. The only thing that was detected on their cheat was an open source driver they used for rapidfire. negligent, sure. Does that justify putting literal pixel aimbots on a list before goldencheats? I'm aware of that, but dont understand how a cheat that has had one part of their vast cheat being detected makes you not want to even list them. Maybe even give them a low rating for negligence, but avoiding them. I'm not gonna argue with you about this because I have a lot of respect for the people over at phantomoverlay, but Whatever the reason you have for avoiding GG, ithink its a bit immature.

PhantomOverlay is ranked based on security. GG has had a detection and admitted to using open source which is massively negligent and puts their entire community at risk. Scores are based on functionality as well as security. Please do your research to prevent further embarrassing yourself and looking like a smooth brained sperg.

seems like you have a clear bias towards phantomoverlay since you gave it a ridiculously higher rating than other providers, while it still lacks basic features like customisable esp and no recoil. meanwhile, goldencheats, another competitor that has more features, an unlockall, uav, and things no one has like recoil sliders is absent. Is that because po and golden have never been detected, and golden is an objectively better cheat, so putting it on the list would mean you'd have less marketing for phantomoverlay? not objective