Windmilltraining Packet

[FirzenExpert]

bump

[redjoker5]

Oh yeah. This is totally going to get released. Then everyone on Mabi can have R1 windmill. Not likely. Find some tutorials and see if you can work it out? Let me know how that goes.

[FirzenExpert]

Originally Posted by redjoker5

Oh yeah. This is totally going to get released. Then everyone on Mabi can have R1 windmill. Not likely. Find some tutorials and see if you can work it out? Let me know how that goes.

i did, i rpe and tracked packets, i tested every single one of them, none of them gave me training points.( i went out and wm 2 boss creep )

[Kevsprk]

You most likely can't do this by packet editing alone. MAYBE with DLL editing, but most likely not.

[Infamy^^]

WM training is based on killing things. Killing things is server-sided. You can't really mess with things like that.

[Kefkai]

Originally Posted by fenrir2037

Stop freaking bumping this, try it your self. I've tried all the send packets when you wm, nothing happens. And quoting Logged, how reliable is fallengrave. True he released redox to the public. He didnt find it, someone else did. =__=

And he didn't fully understand how it worked either from the last time I recall, packet editors sure have allowed for a new crowd to become "modders". They really do only require about the intelligence of a chimpanzee to use.

[lostmage333]

Originally Posted by Kefkai

And he didn't fully understand how it worked either from the last time I recall, packet editors sure have allowed for a new crowd to become "modders". They really do only require about the intelligence of a chimpanzee to use.

QFT

A lot of these "idea" threads really need to be rethought. WM training is obviously based on kills. You never send a "kill" packet, you send an "attack" (or in this case, "Use WM") packet. The server tells you if you killed anything.

[xs4intx]

does that means you filter a received message and lied to your client? by saying hey you killed 10 monster dude, when you actually kill one?

[jets2fly2]

fine, since this has started going again, i'll speak up i suppose.

all im going to say is, you need something better than rPE

(which im not giving you)




....



(mabye later.)

[Internetz]

Originally Posted by jets2fly2

fine, since this has started going again, i'll speak up i suppose.

all im going to say is, you need something better than rPE

(which im not giving you)




....



(mabye later.)

cocktease

[Uncreative.]

Obviously it's possible;
everything's possible.
Just not with the tools that you all leeched.
(as jets said)

[jets2fly2]

Originally Posted by Uncreative.

Obviously it's possible;
everything's possible.
Just not with the tools that you all leeched.
(as jets said)

^^

[Dwolf141]

If its Truely "Leeched" as you say, it wouldn't be public in the first place. way to support censorship without regard to the person who has released it to the PUBLIC.

I give my Thanks to all those who supply the common dunce who doesn't know how to create these programs. Aka me and alot of others with ways to come up with new and sometimes less informed IDEAS

[Uncreative.]

Originally Posted by Dwolf141

If its Truely "Leeched" as you say, it wouldn't be public in the first place. way to support censorship without regard to the person who has released it to the PUBLIC.

I give my Thanks to all those who supply the common dunce who doesn't know how to create these programs. Aka me and alot of others with ways to come up with new and sometimes less informed IDEAS

Do you even know what the **** you're talking about?

"DURRR IF IT'S TRULY LEECHED, IT'S NOT PUBLIC HURRRRR"
I don't know, tons of people leech rPE, that's public.

[jets2fly2]

its public because it fails ;o

(and another reason no one shall know. muahahahahaa.)