Hi,
I'm a C++ programmer looking to put together a basic follow bot, and GWCA++ seems like it's generally kept better updated than the various GWA2 files floating around publicly. Given that, and also because I'm more comfortable with C++ than AutoIt, I'd like to use GWCA++ and make the bot in C++ rather than using GWA2 with AutoIt.
Now, I understand that all bots are inherently risky in terms of chance of getting banned (albeit a minor risk given ArenaNet's current hands-off approach to GW1) and also that it's pretty hard to tell whether ArenaNet has actually detected a given API vs just monitored account activity, etc., but I do dimly recall GWA2 having been regarded as generally safer than some of its predecessors / alternatives. Keeping in mind that I'm not expecting a definitive, certain yes or no answer, is there any general consensus regarding GWCA++'s detectability vs GWA2?
I know Toolbox uses it and Toolbox is generally safe to use, but it's not clear whether this is because the API is safe, or Toolbox is just not something ArenaNet cares about, or maybe a mix of both.
Thanks for any info.






