[Tutorial + Source] Bypass Most Anti-Hacks Easy

[cookie69]

Originally Posted by greyb1t

I'm going to guess that it doesn't, but I don't know.
I don't play on official servers at all. It'd be quite dumb if it did work though.

Official servers use kernel mode drivers..this stuff is useless!

[greyb1t]

Originally Posted by cookie69

Official servers use kernel mode drivers..this stuff is useless!

I thought so.

[xMeher]

Thats what happens when you don't use heartbeats , and there's a other method i used to do on ****** servers (obverse etc) just hook exitprocess

[greyb1t]

Originally Posted by xMeher

Thats what happens when you don't use heartbeats , and there's a other method i used to do on ****** servers (obverse etc) just hook exitprocess

Nope, hooking ExitProcess on it's own won't do anything good.
It may either freeze or crash the target application.

[xMeher]

Originally Posted by greyb1t

Nope, hooking ExitProcess on it's own won't do anything good.
It may either freeze or crash the target application.

How would hooking that freeze or crash the target ? Most retarded anti cheats here use it when they detect a cheat to close their neuz , all you have to do is to hook it without returning the original one

[greyb1t]

Originally Posted by xMeher

How would hooking that freeze or crash the target ? Most retarded anti cheats here use it when they detect a cheat to close their neuz , all you have to do is to hook it without returning the original one

I'll just . Try it out for yourself. It does not work by itself.

I'll even quote what a guy said.

What do you want to approach with your hook? When ExitProcess is called the process has already released all of its handles and resources, so you cannot prevent a process from closing with only hooking ExitProcess

[xMeher]

Originally Posted by greyb1t

I'll just . Try it out for yourself. It does not work by itself.

I'll even quote what a guy said.

Im using that without returning the original and its fine, maybe sometimes it will crash but never happend to me and i guess it will never happen because the hook is set before the function is called and you don't return the original one

[uJithee]

Nice .

[al3ab98]

i can see that the ppl who are uploading GGbypass for flyff saying that it just works on windows 7 64bit but i'm using windows 10 pro ? do i have any chance to bypass it lol ?

[greyb1t]

Originally Posted by al3ab98

i can see that the ppl who are uploading GGbypass for flyff saying that it just works on windows 7 64bit but i'm using windows 10 pro ? do i have any chance to bypass it lol ?

No clue as I'm not familiar with GameGuard. But to answer your question, yeah it's most likely possible with windows 10.

[xMeher]

Originally Posted by al3ab98

i can see that the ppl who are uploading GGbypass for flyff saying that it just works on windows 7 64bit but i'm using windows 10 pro ? do i have any chance to bypass it lol ?

Yes it's possible i did it using a driver

[Devisory]

guess nice release but official added a new check on their gameguard which is ridiculous easy to bypass.


for most pservers not even a real ''bypass'' needed. Changing titles or starting the game in a virtual machine works fine

[Xyntra]

Guiness world record entry for unnecessarily upload of the year.

[greyb1t]

Originally Posted by Xyntra

Guiness world record entry for unnecessarily upload of the year.

Was that a nag against this thread? Hard to understand with the english, I really do hope that's not the case though.
If it was, I don't think there's any post or thread is more unnecessary than the one you just posted.
Stop being immature and post such dumb ****. Thanks.

[xMootie]

Originally Posted by greyb1t

I'll just . Try it out for yourself. It does not work by itself.

I'll even quote what a guy said.

If an anticheat calls ExitProcess directly, which many ****** ones do, detouring it properly will keep the application from exiting. There are a lot of other functions that can be used to close a process, the standard "exit" and "terminate" functions comes to mind.

An anticheat can also crash the client to close the client and bypass detours. It's still not a very good solution, as the malicious user could simply remove the crash procedure.

The best solution is to send information about the user to the server, then have the server determine whether or not the user is cheating. If so, the server would disconnect or ban the player server-sided.