POLL which is better CE or Winhex

[GMThunder]

im trying to find out which direction to work on new hacks etc i hope your replies will help

[livelong]

idk i think cheat engine is easier, less time u have to spend setting it up imo.

[Ultimate2moonsPlaya]

Cheat Engine= Faster, Not the most stable.
Winhex= Takes awhile but very stable in game. ( No DC's usually)

[playercube]

CRC Bypass doesn't have GG killer included so thank kinda counts against it.

[GMThunder]

the gg killer is in both launchers if im not mistaken.

[noname231]

Well since you all know my position it's no surprise what I voted.

[EliteDKTrader]

CE is more stable than the crc bypass method... I never dced or getting crash reports in dgs! NEVER!

[Ultimate2moonsPlaya]

Yer but the UG's codes and methods using CE are more stable XD

[nobleman80]

crc method. as we know ce is engine change the data that send to server so it will lag the game. but for crc method the data is already been changed b4 it send to server. let's take a examples. the no of mobs lure. always the crc method could lure more than ce b4 it start to lag.. and why is that we cant use vac when u using ce method in dung. it's cos of the lag make the game crash. however if u using crc method in dung this will not happened. and the hack like def and damage using pak edit is much simple than ce. cos ce give the funny words. and we hardly find the memory we need using memory search.

[Noi]

Originally Posted by nobleman80

crc method. as we know ce is engine change the data that send to server so it will lag the game. but for crc method the data is already been changed b4 it send to server. let's take a examples. the no of mobs lure. always the crc method could lure more than ce b4 it start to lag.. and why is that we cant use vac when u using ce method in dung. it's cos of the lag make the game crash. however if u using crc method in dung this will not happened. and the hack like def and damage using pak edit is much simple than ce. cos ce give the funny words. and we hardly find the memory we need using memory search.

I believe defense and damage edits are server sided (both CE and CRC bypass).
However, I do agree there is significantly less lag with CRC bypass.

[bottomy]

well for which is better just try and make a list of pros and cons. now im guessing by crc bypass and winhex thats referring to just pak file editing.

pak editing pros:
more stable then CE editing
can edit individual mobs
can edit individual skills etc.
can make a more personal hack.

pak editing cons:
have to re-edit the pak after big updates.
if you make a mistake while editing its hard to find where you made that mistake.
takes up alot of room (file size).
dependence on crc bypass to work.


CE editing pros:
can edit alot more then just stuff you can do with pak editing.
alot quicker to edit.
doesn't take up any large amount of space (file size)
only need to bypass gg to be able to use

CE editing cons:
not as stable. (depends how you use it)
if people just upload scripts, its kinda of just like a 1 click (so not really helping people improve their skills).



anyways cause you said you wanna know which direction to work on new hacks. well pak editing i don't really think theres any new stuff to come from that. but CE editing your options for the amount of different stuff you could find are much much bigger.

[nobleman80]

Originally Posted by Noi

I believe defense and damage edits are server sided (both CE and CRC bypass).
However, I do agree there is significantly less lag with CRC bypass.

i just tried the defence and damage hack a few days ago. it did pump up my def and damage. but i m not sure the increase of def and damagfe for my char is for show or what cos i nv try to att on any1.

[bottomy]

Originally Posted by nobleman80

i just tried the defence and damage hack a few days ago. it did pump up my def and damage. but i m not sure the increase of def and damagfe for my char is for show or what cos i nv try to att on any1.

it'll be for show, stats are serverside.