SV is it safe then or it isnt?

[cs_snk]

PLZ some big karma , and lvl 2,3 ppl, tell me if it is safe or it isnt , the new Scrip Vassel .
and if it is safe then why are the scanners telling me that there are some backdoor/trojans

oke im a noob and i donno, i will just trust in your words (DM2000 , SOLOMON , RATTLZ , LOWFYR).
plz explain me in noobish way why are the results giving those trojans

[knightie]

You better trust yourself rather then you trust others.

If your scanner says it got backdoor or some trojan.
its clear that its unsafe to use it.

You better get the copy from authenticated source with which yes mods and admin can guide.

[omega02]

dont get anyfrom from ppl with under 100 post or under 10 karma.

[evlreturned7]

well.... if DM2000 is sending it to people, it is obviously safe..... think about it....

[pokey2]

I haven't heard of this back door stuff before.... I always thought it was completely safe...

[omega02]

Originally posted by evlreturned7@Jan 4 2007, 14:40
well.... if DM2000 is sending it to people, it is obviously safe..... think about it....

always trust the mods. dont think they would corrupt their own website

[Mokujin]

agreed and honestly mr.rattlz already said he does not
play Co.. there for it would be pointless for him to put a
backdoor in it. And the only other person to put a backdoor in it would be 9net9. Now we all know there was no backdoor in the original copartner so y would there be one in this version?

[963852741]

again, its only POSSIABLE trojan/backdoor which means that it could just be similiar coding soent mean its not safe

[skiinfreakDH]

Originally posted by Mokujin@Jan 4 2007, 20:44
agreed and honestly mr.rattlz already said he does not
play Co.. there for it would be pointless for him to put a
backdoor in it. And the only other person to put a backdoor in it would be 9net9. Now we all know there was no backdoor in the original copartner so y would there be one in this version?

well there was a rumor that 9net9 put a backdoor in so they could hack people who didn't pay for the program, but I'm not sure if that's actually true.

[963852741]

Originally posted by skiinfreakDH+Jan 4 2007, 20:58--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (skiinfreakDH @ Jan 4 2007, 20:58)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--Mokujin@Jan 4 2007, 20:44
agreed and honestly mr.rattlz already said he does not
play Co.. there for it would be pointless for him to put a
backdoor in it. And the only other person to put a backdoor in it would be 9net9. Now we all know there was no backdoor in the original copartner so y would there be one in this version?

well there was a rumor that 9net9 put a backdoor in so they could hack people who didn't pay for the program, but I'm not sure if that's actually true. [/b][/quote]
yea, im pretty sure if they did that, they would be sued becasue putting a backdoor in a product they sell is probably...illegal

[n0b0dYsB3tT3r]

Originally posted by skiinfreakDH+Jan 4 2007, 20:58--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (skiinfreakDH @ Jan 4 2007, 20:58)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--Mokujin@Jan 4 2007, 20:44
agreed and honestly mr.rattlz already said he does not
play Co.. there for it would be pointless for him to put a
backdoor in it. And the only other person to put a backdoor in it would be 9net9. Now we all know there was no backdoor in the original copartner so y would there be one in this version?

well there was a rumor that 9net9 put a backdoor in so they could hack people who didn't pay for the program, but I'm not sure if that's actually true. [/b][/quote]
thats pure fiction, they have no reason to put backdoors in their own programs...

like said before, its only a POSSIBLE infection

[963852741]

Originally posted by n0b0dYsB3tT3r+Jan 4 2007, 21:05--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (n0b0dYsB3tT3r @ Jan 4 2007, 21:05)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

well there was a rumor that 9net9 put a backdoor in so they could hack people who didn't pay for the program, but I'm not sure if that's actually true.

thats pure fiction, they have no reason to put backdoors in their own programs...

like said before, its only a POSSIBLE infection [/b][/quote]
yes, its like if you scan ANY of the multiclients, a possiable infection comes up even though its clean

[kiom]

Originally posted by Mokujin@Jan 4 2007, 21:44
Now we all know there was no backdoor in the original copartner so y would there be one in this version?

Someone put one in, then its infected.
It may be hard to crack sv, but not hard to put loggers etc. in programs.
(I would never put loggers to any program tho) [img]text2schild.php?smilienummer=1&text=o.o' border='0' alt='o.o' />

[tsu]

Originally posted by 963852741+Jan 4 2007, 21:03--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (963852741 @ Jan 4 2007, 21:03)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

well there was a rumor that 9net9 put a backdoor in so they could hack people who didn't pay for the program, but I'm not sure if that's actually true.

yea, im pretty sure if they did that, they would be sued becasue putting a backdoor in a product they sell is probably...illegal [/b][/quote]
No it's not, it's their product and by buying it you agree on using it in whether condition it is in.
SO if you use it without paying it they could hax your ****.

Im not into laws etc or something like that but I am pretty sure it could be that way.

[at10ti0n]

on site appeared something strange about privacy and so.. from google translation i didn't get much maybe some of u could translate it better: