Register for your free account! | Forgot your password?

You last visited: Today at 10:53

  • Please register to post and access all features, it's quick, easy and FREE!

Advertisement



Nvm

Discussion on Nvm within the Conquer Online 2 forum part of the MMORPGs category.

Reply
 
Old 04/18/2006, 03:43   #16
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12
Received Thanks: 1
Quote:
Originally posted by sailboat22@Apr 18 2006, 03:21
well if they start banning people for multiclient conquers gonna close cuz 3/4 of the population will disapear. if this is true tq is full of mentally retarded people and either its true or the person who made this post doesnt like people using multiclient and is trying to scare us off of it
Haha true dat, multiclient helps level people faster=more demand for dbs=more money for TQ

I doubt they are implementing this
IronSheik is offline  
Old 04/18/2006, 04:19   #17
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Received Thanks: 0
I have it if im not on will they still detect it?
Trojanman!! is offline  
Old 04/18/2006, 06:06   #18
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 60
Received Thanks: 0
*edit*
TheHuntress is offline  
Old 04/18/2006, 08:37   #19
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 30
Received Thanks: 3
would their prog read the conquer.exe? or would they only read that you got the multiclient when 3 are open?
luck is offline  
Old 04/18/2006, 08:45   #20
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 12
Received Thanks: 2
lol if they will do that they are just wasting there time coz they know if it will use proxy surely it has many loged char at the same IP and one thing in the internet cafe they only one for all of the PC. so they cant really predict.
jinx_nit is offline  
Old 04/18/2006, 09:11   #21
 
Tw3ak's Avatar
 
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,489
Received Thanks: 301
this coming from the same person that said partner was going to be detectable also to try and scare people over 2 mnths ago and then a thread about cotobo being detected, I don't believe anything this guy says about co i think he makes these kinda threads as a scare tactic to stop people from using co-partner,cotobo,multiclient ect.
Every thread he has posted about stuff being detectable has been total BS..Infact i think your nothing more then a antihack noobie personally trying to stop people from using cheats.

I'll believe it when i see it is all i gotta say i would take anything stereo says with a grain of salt.
Tw3ak is offline  
Old 04/18/2006, 09:25   #22
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 50
Received Thanks: 0
Quote:
Originally posted by Tw3ak@Apr 18 2006, 09:11
this coming from the same person that said partner was going to be detectable also to try and scare people over 2 mnths ago and then a thread about cotobo being detected, I don't believe anything this guy says about co i think he makes these kinda threads as a scare tactic to stop people from using co-partner,cotobo,multiclient ect.
Every thread he has posted about stuff being detectable has been total BS..Infact i think your nothing more then a antihack noobie personally trying to stop people from using cheats.

I'll believe it when i see it is all i gotta say i would take anything stereo says with a grain of salt.
here here! Aint no one touchin mah autominer, haha!
Zkid is offline  
Old 04/18/2006, 16:30   #23
 
Rorrim's Avatar
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 707
Received Thanks: 56
Quote:
Originally posted by Tw3ak@Apr 18 2006, 09:11
this coming from the same person that said partner was going to be detectable also to try and scare people over 2 mnths ago and then a thread about cotobo being detected, I don't believe anything this guy says about co i think he makes these kinda threads as a scare tactic to stop people from using co-partner,cotobo,multiclient ect.
Every thread he has posted about stuff being detectable has been total BS..Infact i think your nothing more then a antihack noobie personally trying to stop people from using cheats.

I'll believe it when i see it is all i gotta say i would take anything stereo says with a grain of salt.
how about a grain of sh** instead? cause no one will touch that just like they wont touch stero's posts. Come on what are they gonna do hack ur pc to see if its the same pc? internet cafe's man, thats half their business. and sides some autominers (like me) use the gems for the mouse quest instead of profit. i got supers to level here!
Rorrim is offline  
Old 04/18/2006, 17:03   #24
 
chocoman4k's Avatar
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 689
Received Thanks: 212
I highly doubt they will ban users who connect more than 2 times at once, they just won't accept more than 2 connections with the same IP.

Even if this does not become true it would solve many problems TQ currently has - it would reduce number of COtobo miners, it would effectively limit the number of players to 2 per IP and make the ratio of people buying DragonBalls higher (eg. internet caffees will be limited to 2 clients and I don't think people who don't have a PC at home will spend their money on buying DragonBalls so there will be less non-DragonBall buying players on the server at the same time).
chocoman4k is offline  
Old 04/18/2006, 17:20   #25
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 15
Received Thanks: 0
hmmm what if people have like 5 computers at home using the same network, then they going to get banned?
pk1984 is offline  
Old 04/18/2006, 17:23   #26
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 831
Received Thanks: 60
Quote:
Originally posted by pk1984@Apr 18 2006, 17:20
hmmm what if people have like 5 computers at home using the same network, then they going to get banned?
Read the whole topic!

And it is possible at client side to see how many conquers are running on ONE computer:/
Even i can make that!
toreddo is offline  
Old 04/18/2006, 17:42   #27
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 76
Received Thanks: 0
lol... if the player play in an lan house? if have 50 computers, and all playing Conquer online = 50 conquers connected with the same ip.. lol

fake
dilneiss is offline  
Old 04/18/2006, 17:55   #28
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1
Received Thanks: 0
omg were all gona die lol....

i have over 6 running at the same time i would get really ****** if you were right
duking-donut is offline  
Old 04/18/2006, 18:47   #29
 
unknownone's Avatar
 
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,013
Received Thanks: 381
The internet cafe problem has a simple solution, since every legit one needs a licence. An emailed copy of a licence could allow unlimited, or limited connections from that IP.

That doesn't solve the problems of home networks etc, so I'd be willing to bet its false. They'd just create more problems than they're solving.
While any client side protection they put in will be bypassed, their method of detecting multiple clients at the moment is silly, they could easily implement some detection for people modifying their exe's.
unknownone is offline  
Old 04/18/2006, 20:51   #30
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 64
Received Thanks: 1
too fake
always a noob saying ****...
Eddie66688 is offline  
Reply




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Support | Contact Us | FAQ | Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Abuse
Copyright ©2025 elitepvpers All Rights Reserved.