|
You last visited: Today at 09:50
Advertisement
CID proxy could a mod confirm this?
Discussion on CID proxy could a mod confirm this? within the Conquer Online 2 forum part of the MMORPGs category.
03/09/2008, 17:14
|
#31
|
elite*gold: 0 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14
Received Thanks: 3
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MushyPeas
It was never decompiled or checked, the only person to have seen the source is the author.
I'm getting really tired of Hiyoal claiming things he doesn't know anything about or that are simply not true.
If he reads this I'll probably get another emo reply -_-
|
The author(s) being me and/or CID. Which is why I asked how he managed to decompile it. But, you answered it well enough lol
|
|
|
|
03/09/2008, 22:22
|
#32
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,444
Received Thanks: 1,067
|
Ive been looking through some of the ASM coding, and from the looks of it, it doesnt seem to have any backdoors at present.
Im sorry to anyone who I have mislead, I was just reading the the level 2 thread about it and it was compared to many of the "bad" proxies and it seemed like people were saying it was safe.
I can take your point to hand mushy, but when other than this post have I said stuff which I have claimed to do but not actually done?? Im very confused on that statement 
Hok, sometimes....im saying sometimes, should you trust people on this site. Even though I said it was safe, it "could" potentially have backdoors in it, but in my opinion, I would think that highly unlikely.
Sorry once again to misleading some people, I should have not just jumped ahead and put my own opinion forth in regards to level 2 and, without backing it up with some hard evidence.
Hiyoal
|
|
|
|
|
03/10/2008, 00:41
|
#33
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,126
Received Thanks: 2,518
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hiyoal
Ive been looking through some of the ASM coding, and from the looks of it, it doesnt seem to have any backdoors at present.
Im sorry to anyone who I have mislead, I was just reading the the level 2 thread about it and it was compared to many of the "bad" proxies and it seemed like people were saying it was safe.
I can take your point to hand mushy, but when other than this post have I said stuff which I have claimed to do but not actually done?? Im very confused on that statement
Hok, sometimes....im saying sometimes, should you trust people on this site. Even though I said it was safe, it "could" potentially have backdoors in it, but in my opinion, I would think that highly unlikely.
Sorry once again to misleading some people, I should have not just jumped ahead and put my own opinion forth in regards to level 2 and, without backing it up with some hard evidence.
Hiyoal |
You can read and accurately interpret completely jumbled up ASM?
im significantly impressed..............you cant guaruntee its safe, you should never had said "oh yeah its safe"
your unbelivable i cant beleive that you just assumed that from glancing at some ASM that you clearly have no understanding of that, a proxy is safe
how did you ever manage to gain access to level 2?
**** sake...
|
|
|
|
|
03/10/2008, 01:19
|
#34
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,444
Received Thanks: 1,067
|
DW BOUT ANYTHING I HAVE SAID...IM COMPLETELY WRONG...
Happy??! 
Heres the asm code if anyone wants it then, because I completely do not know asm at all.
Happy again??!?
And fyi, I gained access to the underground from helping people about concepts with Conquer, made Ellipse Multi Leveller and I also made 2 extensive guides on programming in AutoIt.
For everyone who had read my posts, and whoever is wanting to know if CID Proxy is safe, the evidence given by others makes the answer inconclusive.
Hiyoal
P.S...Vacs, dont swear at all. There are nicer ways to express your frustration.
|
|
|
|
|
03/10/2008, 01:21
|
#35
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,126
Received Thanks: 2,518
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hiyoal
DW BOUT ANYTHING I HAVE SAID...IM COMPLETELY WRONG...
Happy??!
Heres the asm code if anyone wants it then, because I completely do not know asm at all.
Happy again??!?
And fyi, I gained access to the underground from helping people about concepts with Conquer, made Ellipse Multi Leveller and I also made 2 extensive guides on programming in AutoIt.
For everyone who had read my posts, and whoever is wanting to know if CID Proxy is safe, the evidence given by others makes the answer inconclusive.
Hiyoal
P.S...Vacs, dont swear at all. There are nicer ways to express your frustration. |
yes much better thank you
|
|
|
|
|
03/10/2008, 01:25
|
#36
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 553
Received Thanks: 235
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hiyoal
DW BOUT ANYTHING I HAVE SAID...IM COMPLETELY WRONG...
Happy??!
Heres the asm code if anyone wants it then, because I completely do not know asm at all.
Happy again??!?
And fyi, I gained access to the underground from helping people about concepts with Conquer, made Ellipse Multi Leveller and I also made 2 extensive guides on programming in AutoIt.
For everyone who had read my posts, and whoever is wanting to know if CID Proxy is safe, the evidence given by others makes the answer inconclusive.
Hiyoal
P.S...Vacs, dont swear at all. There are nicer ways to express your frustration. |
<3 Ellipse 
CIDProxy doesnt seem to connect to any other IPs... checked them our a few mins ago If you're worried, google ThreatFire, it seems to detect everything I do... compiled keyloggers, messengers, pingers etc 
|
|
|
|
|
03/12/2008, 19:31
|
#37
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 87
Received Thanks: 1
|
some people just dont understand! just because it hasnt connected to any different IP's yet doesnt mean it cant.
CIDProxy could have functions laying dormant waiting on an event. an event like bananasplit.
if you think turning chat off will help you then you are very silly, the proxy deals with all incomming/outgoing packets.
most mods not responding to this thread simply means to me that they probably feel the same way as most people and believe this is unsafe.
|
|
|
|
|
03/12/2008, 21:09
|
#38
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,707
Received Thanks: 2,525
|
well no matter what we say, people will still use it
until accident happens
just like drugs
i guess people just want to feel better if many people say ITS SAFE
but to me, for something i am not familiar with, i will not pretend i know everything or quote someone's words that it is safe
i will suggest people "use at ur own risk if u think its worth it"
remember the last legend Q proxy? the hacking doesnt happen right away, actually its been almost half year that all people think its ok and super safe, no backdoor whatsoever
and poof, doomday happens
|
|
|
|
|
03/12/2008, 22:57
|
#39
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,749
Received Thanks: 2,199
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by evanxxxm
well no matter what we say, people will still use it
until accident happens
just like drugs
i guess people just want to feel better if many people say ITS SAFE
but to me, for something i am not familiar with, i will not pretend i know everything or quote someone's words that it is safe
i will suggest people "use at ur own risk if u think its worth it"
remember the last legend Q proxy? the hacking doesnt happen right away, actually its been almost half year that all people think its ok and super safe, no backdoor whatsoever
and poof, doomday happens
|
true! So true 
|
|
|
|
|
03/20/2008, 16:12
|
#40
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 29
Received Thanks: 4
|
BANANA SPLIT
|
|
|
|
|
05/19/2008, 12:23
|
#41
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,168
Received Thanks: 8,593
|
Well it hasn't been checked, But it would be appreciated if this discussion was dropped as theres no proof or complaints. The people in the project for it are respected people and good friends to many of the people in the Level 2 Conquer area. Also it would be rather stupid of someone to put so much time into something thats successful and big to just be some scam. I havn't come across anyone being scammed/hacked yet and this is a rather large thread.
|
|
|
|
|
05/19/2008, 18:29
|
#42
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 10
Received Thanks: 0
|
too late for banana split now, hack safe or not....as long you have full info you are safe, lock your item, you log in every 72 hours, if you see a new trade partner, then you know its not safe.........banasplit .....ya thats will be nice to drop those locked items
|
|
|
|
|
05/20/2008, 02:21
|
#43
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 442
Received Thanks: 21
|
the second banasplit coming!!!
thats what they are working on!!!
now they have a tougth work...
cause for dropping items its difficult...
|
|
|
|
|
05/20/2008, 06:59
|
#44
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Received Thanks: 91
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ha.ho.a
the second banasplit coming!!!
thats what they are working on!!!
now they have a tougth work...
cause for dropping items its difficult...
|
Whats even the point to make something like that if the items are locked 
|
|
|
|
|
05/20/2008, 14:47
|
#45
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 166
Received Thanks: 4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PussyRunner
too late for banana split now, hack safe or not....as long you have full info you are safe, lock your item, you log in every 72 hours, if you see a new trade partner, then you know its not safe.........banasplit .....ya thats will be nice to drop those locked items
|
Having full info does not make u "safe"
If your using their proxy within the 72hrs they can stop the unlock screen from even appearing on your client and answer for your client. Might not catch everyone but it would more than 50%. They can stop the trade partners from appearing in your client and the box to confirm from appearing.... Its a proxy it has the ability to block data from your client and act on behalf of your client, not that hard :/
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Similar Threads
|
Can anyone confirm this?
02/15/2010 - Grand Chase - 4 Replies
My GC Patcher recently updated (5 Minutes ago?), when I try to open GC with the hacks I get this message:
http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h183/crasgear/L ol-6.png
are the hacks patched or something?
|
Can any one confirm
02/15/2010 - General Gaming Discussion - 5 Replies
Can some one please confirm this:
http://www.elitepvpers.com/forum/swg-exploits-hack s-bots-tools-macros/76708-free-swg.html
I want a second account but wouldnt like to pay lol
|
Pls confirm the teleports
04/15/2009 - Silkroad Online - 0 Replies
Delete pls my bad :S
|
Confirm please
01/29/2008 - WarRock - 3 Replies
Well this hypothesis is probably posted somewhere on this site that I can't find or somebody that has experience in hacking already thought of this and knows it will not work, but I have not seen a thread talking about it, so here it is.
If I start War Rock then i use task manager (ctrl + alt + del) and i end process PnkBstrA.exe / PnkBstrB.exe, would it just close PunkBuster and it wont detect anything? Or at least anything it did not detect yet and won't scan my computer ?
Simple Terms...
|
Confirm please??
07/18/2007 - Conquer Online 2 - 3 Replies
I read on the CO website in a player tip from someone that there is a bot that nocks of the 0's from the prices in your stall. ie 500,000 becomes 5. is this true?
thx
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:50.
|
|
