Redux v2 - Official 5065 Classic Source

[pro4never]

Originally Posted by InsomniacPro

Who the heck brought up features? That should be the very least someone looks for in a source.

#EDIT
"Efficiency and improvements that can be made for sure but actual failed features? Dunno of any."

Shows where your priorities were.

I have no priorities.

I wrote a super basic source around 3 years ago. Someone wanted some minor features added to it so I did the job.

Eventually their project turned into nothing and I had this sitting on my hdd so I released it.

End of story.


PS: You're welcome to release something better. I have no interest in conquer, I released this to help people have something to work with. Obviously starting from scratch is always the way to go if you have the knowledge.

Or you could just continue being a ******* moron for no reason, that works too <3

[InsomniacPro]

Originally Posted by pro4never

PS: You're welcome to release something better.

Wouldn't be difficult at all.

[pro4never]

Originally Posted by InsomniacPro

Wouldn't be difficult at all.

Then do so.

Till then, people can use my multi year old spaghetti code if they want to or until something viable shows up as an alternative.

[Yupmoh]

Originally Posted by pro4never

Then do so.

Till then, people can use my multi year old spaghetti code if they want to or until something viable shows up as an alternative.

He was just stating that this source isn't really worth being called 'solid' as you stated in the beginning of this thread, Infact he has a very valid point.

[pro4never]

Originally Posted by Execution!

He was just stating that this source isn't really worth being called 'solid' as you stated in the beginning of this thread, Infact he has a very valid point.

And I've stated multiple times that I couldn't care less if anyone uses this source. It was released as an old reference for people to work on as open source base. Most of the code in its current state was not written by myself and I couldn't begin to tell you what issues it might have in its current form. I also have no real memory of how the source is structured to make any efficiency or stability debates besides 'meh, it runs fine'.


Before you can complain about being 'bad' I would hope to see either A: better resources being contributed or B: constructive updates to existing projects.

I have zero involvement in the conquer 'community' and have not played the game in 5+ years. Having him try to **** on me for offering tidbits of advice from time to time is just stupid. If he wants to correct something I've said then he's also welcome to do that but no, he'd rather just troll.

[ahmed1234550]

Small Question, you will update this source or 2.9 last v?

[hellwizard]

how can I fix someone help me?

[Aceking]

Can't see it, far too small.

[hellwizard]

how to put the npc who posted , and how I create the npc Magic Artisan

[ScorpioN[Timur]]

verry best source but I was unable to...
Would you could you make a video?

[Yupmoh]

And this is when it starts with the weird comments XD.

[bigode1477]

location walk invalid erro.

[magedmarshell]

where can i find the .sql file?

[Y u k i]

in the archive.

[Gazzayeatman]

So close to finishing the four stages of Dis city. Exciting =D