|
You last visited: Today at 05:44
Advertisement
Conquer Open Source Project
Discussion on Conquer Open Source Project within the CO2 Private Server forum part of the Conquer Online 2 category.
11/10/2010, 10:29
|
#76
|
elite*gold: 20 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,126
Received Thanks: 2,518
|
Uploading to a separate location just makes more work for me, more work for you, and you dont have the massive advantage of being able to right click on the repo and click -> tortoisehg and then click update and receiving the latest upto date version, not to mention the advantages of branch management.
Its not like anouther application will make a massive difference, especially one like tortoisehg which does practically nothing.
|
|
|
|
11/10/2010, 15:36
|
#77
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,296
Received Thanks: 925
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Korvacs
I completely forgot about that, i modified my client ages ago and changed the auth port so that i could proxy and work on the server at the same time without having to worry about various other things. Ill change the source and my client back tomorrow.
And no the game port doesnt matter, the server tells the client what it is so it can be whatever you want.
Kind of shows how many people are using this since its only just been pointed out that no one can actually login...
|
Well the people that use this could have decided to not tell you.
|
|
|
|
|
11/10/2010, 15:38
|
#78
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,126
Received Thanks: 2,518
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiyono
Well the people that use this could have decided to not tell you.
|
Well indeed, but thats not exactly a good way to encourage development....lol
|
|
|
|
|
11/10/2010, 16:50
|
#79
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 237
Received Thanks: 99
|
I really like that source, nice quadtree implementation, but wouldnt a Red-Black Tree be enough for 2d applications O.o
|
|
|
|
|
11/10/2010, 17:01
|
#80
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,126
Received Thanks: 2,518
|
Well, seeing as this is an open source project, feel free to implement one in place of the quadtree and see what you think is best  if it proves to be more efficient while still having the functionality required then ill certainly consider replacing the quadtree at some stage.
|
|
|
|
|
11/10/2010, 19:09
|
#81
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 237
Received Thanks: 99
|
Ill see what i can do, not promising anything as im currently working on a C# operating system
|
|
|
|
|
11/11/2010, 00:08
|
#82
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 787
Received Thanks: 314
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by |NeoX
I really like that source, nice quadtree implementation, but wouldnt a Red-Black Tree be enough for 2d applications O.o |
Nice attempt at being intelligent.
Binary trees are efficient at searching based on keys (as they're sorted in inc/dec order); that's much less complex than spatial partitioning.
|
|
|
|
|
11/11/2010, 00:47
|
#83
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 237
Received Thanks: 99
|
Im sorry if my opinion doesnt meet your standarts. But since we store everything with a (U)ID it would get a performance plus if im not mistaken. Correct me if im wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
11/11/2010, 02:54
|
#84
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 787
Received Thanks: 314
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by |NeoX
Im sorry if my opinion doesnt meet your standarts. But since we store everything with a (U)ID it would get a performance plus if im not mistaken. Correct me if im wrong.
|
For looking up information based on UIDs, yes.
The purpose of a quadtree is not to look up information based on keys, but rather to look up entities based on location (relative to another location). Searching through a binary tree that way offers no performance gain (and is actually slower than indexing an array).
|
|
|
|
|
11/11/2010, 15:34
|
#85
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 237
Received Thanks: 99
|
Alright tao thank you, i wasnt aware of that aspect.
|
|
|
|
|
11/12/2010, 04:29
|
#86
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 469
Received Thanks: 94
|
the source looks good, but have note tested it yet, i just download it xD. just got back into c#
[EDIT]
when i try to open the auth or game .exe file it gets a error and the it closes off.
|
|
|
|
|
11/23/2010, 02:25
|
#87
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 72
Received Thanks: 5
|
Just downloaded the repo, going to take a look at it. Perhaps use it for my own project, even if I do this, as a thanks for the source, I'll fwd all bugs/issues I find onto you. Thanks again mate. =)
|
|
|
|
|
11/24/2010, 02:42
|
#88
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 469
Received Thanks: 94
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/24/2010, 09:43
|
#89
|
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,126
Received Thanks: 2,518
|
Its in the database folder....
|
|
|
|
|
11/24/2010, 13:58
|
#90
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 469
Received Thanks: 94
|
i don't mean the database backup i mean the database server. i dont no where to download it at
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Similar Threads
|
Open Beta Conquer 1.0 Project
07/29/2009 - CO2 Private Server - 54 Replies
Justin:
meh, me(justin), impulse(alexbigfoot), lostsolder05(real lostsold), junior(master15) have decided to start working together, we also decided on using a scratch source... so... the server will be off for awhile, untill we can get sumthing half decent out, the current source is just gabrage, it shouldnt be long before we can get sumthing out though, sorry for any inconvience
|
Open Source Project: SREmu
01/25/2009 - Silkroad Online - 18 Replies
I am just making this topic to bring your attention to recent development at SREmu.
SREmu has gone from a VB6 project to an open-source C++ project hosted on SourceForge.
At the moment I am the only one working on it, but I would like to see it a community driven project. To clarify: I'm not looking for a team, I'm looking for knowledgable people that code in C++, preferably with some experience with x86 assembler, packet logging / parsing, subversion, visual studio, etc.
About the...
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:45.
|
|
