[DEV] CoEmu v5156 flatfile based.

[.Ocularis]

Why not just release it, but without the source? Just release a built version and pack it?

[ImmuneOne]

Originally Posted by Mentalis

Why not just release it, but without the source? Just release a built version and pack it?

What would be the use of just the executable?

[sawickas]

Realais only packet it will inaf.

[ImmuneOne]

Originally Posted by sawickas

Realais only packet it will inaf.

What packet? I gave you guys everything needed to convert coemu to 5156 but every single one that read my thread failed to do it. That's why I'm creating this source.

[sawickas]

So its no reason ask for realais it or only yuo one know how yuo want realais it or no! XD

[sonofskeletor]

This Is The Source My Brother Paid You For To Make. Thats Rude!

[renetjuuh]

im saying no to release it ,because people have to learn coding by there own

[pro4never]

I'm saying yes for one very large reason.

Replace 5156 lotf.

Seriously. CoEmu (even the base version) is infinitely better than any version of lotf I've seen (yes, I'm fully aware CoEmu has some serious problems too, but for a publicly released source that's not just a framework it's **** good)

Re-writing much of it and converting it to a newer patch would be a breath off fresh air into the stagnated pserver community. You have no idea how much I'd like to be able to write more features and functionality for a source that someone actually cares about. Hell I finished an entire quest for CoEmu last week and was like 'why bother releasing it.. of the people who do seem to use CoEmu still they either A: don't want help cause they know what they are doing or B: can't understand the first thing about what I'd post'. While I suppose a similar argument can be made against an updated CoEmu version, improving the pserver community as a whole starts with yourself. Saying no one tries hard enough, no one releases anything worth using, it's all just copy/paste noobs etcis in some part due to your own failure to put something into the community.

Note: last part is not an attack on anyone, least of all the thread starter. Just saying that to improve the community you have to TRY to improve the community.

[ImmuneOne]

Originally Posted by pro4never

I'm saying yes for one very large reason.

Replace 5156 lotf.

Seriously. CoEmu (even the base version) is infinitely better than any version of lotf I've seen (yes, I'm fully aware CoEmu has some serious problems too, but for a publicly released source that's not just a framework it's damn good)

Re-writing much of it and converting it to a newer patch would be a breath off fresh air into the stagnated pserver community. You have no idea how much I'd like to be able to write more features and functionality for a source that someone actually cares about. Hell I finished an entire quest for CoEmu last week and was like 'why bother releasing it.. of the people who do seem to use CoEmu still they either A: don't want help cause they know what they are doing or B: can't understand the first thing about what I'd post'. While I suppose a similar argument can be made against an updated CoEmu version, improving the pserver community as a whole starts with yourself. Saying no one tries hard enough, no one releases anything worth using, it's all just copy/paste noobs etcis in some part due to your own failure to put something into the community.

Note: last part is not an attack on anyone, least of all the thread starter. Just saying that to improve the community you have to TRY to improve the community.

Exactly,

I guess some of your points are right but I doubt the trying to improve the community, as you said CoEmu will be used also because it's at the same patch as that LOTF source. But don't forget we're talking about the co2 section it's too late already. As soon as I release it, they will ask about how to set it up, connect to the client and add in new features.

As long I got my own base I'm not bothering releasing this.

[chickmagnet]

Originally Posted by ImmuneOne

Exactly,

I guess some of your points are right but I doubt the trying to improve the community, as you said CoEmu will be used also because it's at the same patch as that LOTF source. But don't forget we're talking about the co2 section it's too late already. As soon as I release it, they will ask about how to set it up, connect to the client and add in new features.

As long I got my own base I'm not bothering releasing this.

it is all u wat ever makes u happy

[_tao4229_]

lol coemu isn't that much better tbh.

lotf just has a bad rep.

[pro4never]

Ok... Attack calculations? That alone makes me have no faith in lotf. That the attack calculations are SO messed up is not a good indicator for the rest of the source.

having looked at old lotf in passing the rest of it was just as bad. Poor organization, lots of flaws with just about every release I've seen for it, etc.

Not saying the source COULDN'T be improved, just saying why bother? It's got so many flaws and has no advantages whatsoever. The ONLY advantage it has is being on a newer patch and there is already information available for people wanting to update coemu to the new patch (granted, it's not the simplest thing to do but it's certainly possible)


*sigh* I need to stop coding. I keep starting random mini projects to avoid doing any other work. Seriously. Tonight alone I did 3 projects (most of which failed/gave up on but still, that's alot of wasted time!)

[~Yuki~]

PPL get cash together n we´ll give tanel some lesson´s in math kk?

[_tao4229_]

he doesn't need math lessons, he needs c+p lessons from CO forums.

one algorithm doesn't stand for the work of the source either.

[ImmuneOne]

Originally Posted by _tao4229_

he doesn't need math lessons, he needs c+p lessons from CO forums.

one algorithm doesn't stand for the work of the source either.

I'm not releasing the CoEmu version anymore, I just wrote a new base as a better start instead of messy/buggy sources.