Random Spawn

[arneljan]

How to make This a Random Spawn Cord.

PHP Code:

#region SnowBanshe
            if (Now64.Minute == 27 && Now64.Second == 00 && Kernel.Spawn == false)
            {
                if (Kernel.Maps.ContainsKey(1762))
                {
                    Kernel.Spawn = true;
                    Database.MonsterInformation mob;
                    Database.MonsterInformation.MonsterInformations.TryGetValue(4171, out mob);
                    client.Map.Spawnthis(mob, client, 1762, 342, 363);
                    Kernel.SendWorldMessage(new MessiProject.Network.GamePackets.Message("Warning SnowBanshee Appeared At Forzen Grotto 2nd Floor Hunt it Fast And Claim your Prize", Color.Red, 2012));
                }
            }
            #endregion 


[OverKillasdwqe]

at
client.Map.Spawnthis(mob, client, 1762, 342, 363);

instead of using 342/363
use an instance of system random class then call next(min/max) for both x,y

but you have to nerf that out, a nice method to get a valid coords within a radius around point

but the easiest solution would be creating a directory of points where to randomly (using system random instance) pick up one of them

[Wolfy.]

Messi project. Wow. Such source...

[Spirited]

Please google before you post.

[Aceking]

Probably a better idea to point him towards thread safe randoms. Lord knows that source probably has some crazy thread issues underneath. Or of course its running off one thread period, that wouldn't surprise me.

[abdoumatrix]

Originally Posted by Wolfy.

Messi project. Wow. Such source...

no , it is what we call bigshow
a little better


@TopicOwner

PHP Code:

var cord = Map.RandomCoordinates();
client.Entity.Teleport(Map.ID, cord.Item1, cord.Item2); 


try something like this

[Spirited]

Originally Posted by abdoumatrix

no , it is what we call bigshow
a little better


@TopicOwner

PHP Code:

var cord = Map.RandomCoordinates();
client.Entity.Teleport(Map.ID, cord.Item1, cord.Item2); 


try something like this

I don't mean to be negative, but a little better than shoulder deep in shit is waste deep in shit. Neither of which seem very appealing. On topic: At least there's a method for it already.

[abdoumatrix]

Originally Posted by Spirited

I don't mean to be negative, but a little better than shoulder deep in **** is waste deep in ****. Neither of which seem very appealing. On topic: At least there's a method for it already.

it is just a good source if u want to make server for u and ur friends
or if u want to try learning but as ur knowledge increase in programing u will know what is good and bad in it what will happen when u see some other good references and sources.

it just fit in specific time and specific knowladge.

[CptSky]

Originally Posted by Aceking

Probably a better idea to point him towards thread safe randoms. Lord knows that source probably has some crazy thread issues underneath. Or of course its running off one thread period, that wouldn't surprise me.

No need to use a thread safe random with the overhead. Creating a Random object in few classes / methods is not a big task.