Okay, a lot of you know its really easy to reflect a .exe if its made in .NET and a lot of other languages, for that reason you have to encrypt it.
A free Encryption software is .
Please do not flame me for posting this, I'm just trieing to keep your files secure.
If anyone knows a better FREE protector, please post a link, or if anyone knows a way to reflect this protector, please tell me, and I'll find a better one.
Definition Reflect:
They can decrypt the .exe to see your source, basically, they reflect the .exe back to the orginal source. (If anyone knows a better definiton please post it here)
~Bas
Hit the thanks button if this post (helped) learned you (with) anything
I'm not supporting you on your idea to "protect" the human knowledge that belongs to the world but there is another solution if you really want to be selfish and not share anything, which is called : Packing like UPX. The best would be to make your own Packer since known packers are easy to unpack
I'm not supporting you on your idea to "protect" the human knowledge that belongs to the world but there is another solution if you really want to be selfish and not share anything, which is called : Packing like UPX. The best would be to make your own Packer since known packers are easy to unpack
Your saying people should be able to reflect your .exe and get your source, and if they like find all the possible hacks/bugs and even edit it, and release it giving theirself all the credits? Protecting the .exe is better imo.
If they want people to get the source, just release the source, or don't encrypt it.
I just give people the opportunity to protect their source, you don't have to protect it.
I found out a way to make any application undecryptable / undecompileable , and it's directly in C#, no need to use stuffs like this.
Well, I hope you are going to release it, otherwise, this is a easy way to to encrypt them. However, maybe what you are doing is adding a encrypting code in every source? I think that's more work. And I don't think anyone as good at coding as you are, doesn't know how to encrypt.
Public packers have public unpackers; that doesn't take time, it takes Google.
Obfuscation however can't really be reversed other than decrypting the strings back, considering the variable names are completely gone. Sure if they take the time to look at obfuscated code they can figure it out, but I know I wouldn't do it unless there was something I actually wanted. It's just a pain.
@Tao
The way I'm doing it cannot be decompiled, you CAN NOT get the sourcecode out of that exe, simple as that, and as it isn't really a obfuscator (is that even a word?) , there are no programs to decompile the exe.
@Hybrid
Again, you need to understand not everybody come from USA, didn't you know that already? My native language isn't english and I often can not say the correct word to make the sentence proper or understandable.
@Tao
The way I'm doing it cannot be decompiled, you CAN NOT get the sourcecode out of that exe, simple as that, and as it isn't really a obfuscator (is that even a word?) , there are no programs to decompile the exe.
@Hybrid
Again, you need to understand not everybody come from USA, didn't you know that already? My native language isn't english and I often can not say the correct word to make the sentence proper or understandable.
Over 'n out
You finally admit to the language barrier? Good good. You seemed to think otherwise *points to signature*. My point is nothing is undecryptable. By logic, if its encrypted, it is reversible. Just because there are no existing programs to reverse something, doesn't mean one can't be made. Mind I remind you of the codeveil incident not too long ago?
@Tao
The way I'm doing it cannot be decompiled, you CAN NOT get the sourcecode out of that exe, simple as that, and as it isn't really a obfuscator (is that even a word?) , there are no programs to decompile the exe.
@Hybrid
Again, you need to understand not everybody come from USA, didn't you know that already? My native language isn't english and I often can not say the correct word to make the sentence proper or understandable.
Over 'n out
Every encryption has a decryption. (Note: Not talking about hashes such as MD5, that's not an encryption) The fact that the program has to decrypt ITSELF before it runs just makes it that much easier.
editing .exe's 08/09/2009 - Dekaron Private Server - 4 Replies which program would be best to edit .exe files?
Need help With all exe's 08/07/2009 - Dekaron Private Server - 2 Replies http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/8609/qweqwet.jp g
all odbc's Activiated with (local)
Configs are 127.0.0.1(all)
DB id sa
db pass sa
One of the best Conquer.exe's which are released. 02/20/2009 - CO2 Exploits, Hacks & Tools - 2 Replies It works on Patch 5101
Features:
-Conquer.rar:
1.Multiclient
2.No pop-up(Removed Website Popup)
3.No virus-scan(Removed Anti-Virus/Spyware Scanner)
4.Enabled PM commands
5.You can run Conquer.exe directly
6.Wall Jump(NOT Including GW(Unfortunately I can't make it.))
[Share] Unpacked translated Server EXE's 01/22/2008 - EO PServer Hosting - 2 Replies As the title says, here is server exe's unpacked and translated to english....
UNPACKED EXE's
Pass: gotitatr agezone
no space
credit: AquaLung
hey can any one encrypt 10/20/2007 - Kal Online - 1 Replies hey can any one encrypt this jobsystem-e
![[NOTE]Encrypt .exe's before releasing!](https://www.elitepvpers.com/forum/iconimages/co2-private-server/note-encrypt-exes-before-releasing_ltr.gif){kind=small}
.
