Register for your free account! | Forgot your password?

Go Back   elitepvpers > MMORPGs > Conquer Online 2 > CO2 Private Server
You last visited: Today at 17:54

  • Please register to post and access all features, it's quick, easy and FREE!

Advertisement



[Development] Redemption - Conquer 1.5

Discussion on [Development] Redemption - Conquer 1.5 within the CO2 Private Server forum part of the Conquer Online 2 category.

Reply
 
Old   #1
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 726
Received Thanks: 271
Post [Development] Redemption - Conquer 1.5

This has been in development for quite some time already, but I feel now is a good time to start this development thread as progress continues.
Also want to mention that many of the finer details still haven't been decided or are yet set in stone.
And there is no tentative release date yet either, but stay tuned to this thread to find out more information as it is available!

So without further ado, I would like to introduce:

Redemption

Last Updated: 8/21/14
Reason: Added website


Website:

Description

Patch

Server Rates

What there WON'T be

What there WILL be

Classical Features such as:

Modern Features such as:

New Features:


Misc Features:


I will continue to post development and spoilers here. As I said at the beginning, there is no release date yet. But the development is active and progressing nicely.

Spoilers/Teasers
Aceking is offline  
Old 03/13/2014, 02:49   #2
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 648
Received Thanks: 413
Name in use?
Y u k i is offline  
Thanks
1 User
Old 03/13/2014, 02:57   #3
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 726
Received Thanks: 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Y u k i View Post
Name in use?
In all honesty, that release is quite old that I don't believe the name will become an issue.
That being said, if lostsolder05 does have an issue with it. I will gladly remove the name.

Redemption is just the project name I am using. It might change in the future but at this point seems unlikely unless there is an issue with it.
Aceking is offline  
Old 03/13/2014, 03:01   #4
 
Spirited's Avatar
 
elite*gold: 12
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,283
Received Thanks: 4,191
Best of luck to you. Glad to see you didn't lose your thread when the board went offline for its daily backup.
Spirited is offline  
Old 03/13/2014, 05:31   #5
 
lostsolder05's Avatar
 
elite*gold: 20
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 890
Received Thanks: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aceking View Post
In all honesty, that release is quite old that I don't believe the name will become an issue.
That being said, if lostsolder05 does have an issue with it. I will gladly remove the name.

Redemption is just the project name I am using. It might change in the future but at this point seems unlikely unless there is an issue with it.
No problems here. Good luck.
lostsolder05 is offline  
Old 03/13/2014, 16:57   #6


 
CptSky's Avatar
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,443
Received Thanks: 1,175
If you want the official algorithm for TQ spawns, check in my COPS v7 Emulator source. I reimplemented it and it works well.
CptSky is offline  
Old 03/13/2014, 17:16   #7
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 726
Received Thanks: 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by CptSky View Post
If you want the official algorithm for TQ spawns, check in my COPS v7 Emulator source. I reimplemented it and it works well.
I took their spawn database. And converted their weird values using their algorithm from their EO source that you posted at some point.
So it pretty much is the official spawns.
Aceking is offline  
Old 03/15/2014, 02:40   #8
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 726
Received Thanks: 271
Spoiler from Dis City....

Gallery 1
Aceking is offline  
Old 03/15/2014, 06:10   #9
 
Spirited's Avatar
 
elite*gold: 12
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,283
Received Thanks: 4,191
Looking Good. I'm glad things are working out with that source.
Spirited is offline  
Old 03/17/2014, 11:54   #10
 
InsomniacPro's Avatar
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 397
Received Thanks: 205
So I do have a question for you. Why do you prefer the TQ spawn system against what you had before? Did the mobs spawn in a better format than the system prior to TQ's?
InsomniacPro is offline  
Old 03/17/2014, 12:08   #11
 
Ultimation's Avatar
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,430
Received Thanks: 1,586
my guess is because tqs database has all spawns, amount to spawn, there actions on death and spawn etc etc saves alot of time coding in 300+ spawn points.
Ultimation is offline  
Old 03/17/2014, 12:43   #12
 
InsomniacPro's Avatar
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 397
Received Thanks: 205
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultimation View Post
my guess is because tqs database has all spawns, amount to spawn, there actions on death and spawn etc etc saves alot of time coding in 300+ spawn points.
Not talking about their database entries. I'm referring to the actual calculations.
InsomniacPro is offline  
Old 03/17/2014, 13:20   #13
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 726
Received Thanks: 271
Well ulti is right. Everything is there.
All the mob spawns ranging from TC all the way to other maps like moonbox, dis city, AZ, metzone.

Spawn times, and amount to spawn per generation. Its really authentic to the point where I personally can't tell the difference between that and retail CO.

When your stuck making your own spawns for each map, and trying to get them correct...its a huge pain.
So converting TQs system was a much more viable and accurate option.
Aceking is offline  
Old 03/18/2014, 15:22   #14
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 52
Received Thanks: 0
This is my dream server but you will mess it up and add 2.0 stuff into it and ruin it

I wish there was a pure 1.0 server out there I mean I dont care if it uses a 2.0 client etc with the features removed just that it ACTUALLY is 1.0 Love2Hate, Classic Conquer all claim to be the new 1.0 pservers and suck hard because they added there own stuff :S why cant we see a pure 1.0 server which I for one would play because that was the best co experience for me after all the new features were added I had to quit co because it just wasent the same anymore

You will probably make the best close 1.0 server out there which will probably end up with me playing it if your gonna actually run it as a server and wish you the best of luck, Wish I could programme a server myself completely from scratch, Slowly learning one day I will

The Redux source Pro4 made is amazing and if he fixed the bridge errors and the mob AI w/e it is then id use it too because I have heard many people say how easy it is to upgrade/downgrade and remove/add features into it and its coded more clean in a way everyone can understand
Ciarda is offline  
Old 03/18/2014, 16:07   #15
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 648
Received Thanks: 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ciarda View Post
This is my dream server but you will mess it up and add 2.0 stuff into it and ruin it

I wish there was a pure 1.0 server out there I mean I dont care if it uses a 2.0 client etc with the features removed just that it ACTUALLY is 1.0 Love2Hate, Classic Conquer all claim to be the new 1.0 pservers and suck hard because they added there own stuff :S why cant we see a pure 1.0 server which I for one would play because that was the best co experience for me after all the new features were added I had to quit co because it just wasent the same anymore

You will probably make the best close 1.0 server out there which will probably end up with me playing it if your gonna actually run it as a server and wish you the best of luck, Wish I could programme a server myself completely from scratch, Slowly learning one day I will

The Redux source Pro4 made is amazing and if he fixed the bridge errors and the mob AI w/e it is then id use it too because I have heard many people say how easy it is to upgrade/downgrade and remove/add features into it and its coded more clean in a way everyone can understand
Everyone seems to praise Redux for some reason. Its almost as bad as LOTF was. Constant Stackoverflows caused by a fucking flawed implementation of memcpy, move and set. Also a flawed socket system wich results in infitite loops every now and then. The bugs Specy and I had to fix so he could run a propper server are countless and yet everyday there are more surprises.

The Bridges aka scenes and the Mob AI are probably the two most unimportant factors here.

While Redux runs fine if there arent too many players playing, after you hit the 20+ for over 6 hours it fails hard. Really hard.

Regards your core post: I too would like to see a real classic conquer server, but not 1.0, more like the Qonquer Patch 4531 ~
Y u k i is offline  
Thanks
1 User
Reply

Tags
5065, classic, events, levelling, pvp


Similar Threads Similar Threads
[Tour] Project Redemption Development Server
08/20/2011 - Rappelz - 85 Replies
Introduction: Hello, I am Chris. Or as many of you know me 'ismokedrow' I am the Project Lead and Lead Developer of Project Redemption. This whole project is aimed at sharing with the community and providing new and easy ways to adapt and tame an other-wise unfriendly server. While the project does owe it's roots to the NCarbon Developement Team, it does not hold their values or practices. This project is founded on sharing and will remain that way. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~...
Conquer B.C. Development Status.
09/25/2009 - CO2 Private Server - 33 Replies
as many of you probably know, teams have been starting a lot lately. well, our team is out and going in the chase to create the next big private server. just for you to know in advance, it IS 5017, if you don't like 5017, then gtfo. our staff has been working hard lately, and we're progressing by a great amount daily. expect for the beta to open in the near coming days (5-6) and followed by the opening of Conquer B.C. as of us starting with a blank coded source, (nothing except socket...
Conquer 1.0 development
08/31/2009 - CO2 Private Server - 1 Replies
I was messing around trying to connect to CO1 client 4251. I was wondering if the Auth Response packet was changed after this client because I am not getting any response from the Client. I can connect to the 4351 client without problems. I would appreciate any help. Thank You



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:55.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Support | Contact Us | FAQ | Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Abuse
Copyright ©2026 elitepvpers All Rights Reserved.