I'm Back Guys.

~~WrathKing~~ · 09/12/2012, 00:47

I've been gone for a while since and now I'm back. And guess what? I learned C# fluently. What have I missed? What's the newest best source released, etc?

Danial Eugen · 09/12/2012, 00:52

What is the last source you heard about so we can tell you... xD

~~WrathKing~~ · 09/12/2012, 00:54

Ugh, I don't quite remember. I know Hybrid was working on a new source, not sure if he's released it? That and something by p4n? I'm not sure that's why I'm asking.

Danial Eugen · 09/12/2012, 00:55

pro4never released Albetros source and Infamous released CSV3 source just recently

~~WrathKing~~ · 09/12/2012, 00:56

What is the best one currently then? Just to look into it and start working.

~~pro4never~~ · 09/12/2012, 01:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by slitherbug

conquer-sx is vary good

qft

~~WrathKing~~ · 09/12/2012, 01:35

Well?

Danial Eugen · 09/12/2012, 01:44

Well it all belongs to you... CSV3 has the password encryption bypass if you want to run your server on patches higher than 5530, but still you can implement his bypass in Albetros xD

So i would to chose i will prefer Albetros because it uses a basic programming style and it is very understandable

manager2 · 09/12/2012, 03:49

You say you have learned C# "fluently" but cannot code a source? getting the best source out there (CSV3!!!) for a reference is fair enough, but you have only implied you want to code on it, You need to hit the books again.

Also, I don't think you have been gone long enough to learn what you need to know if you had heard about p4n and inf releasing a source.

It takes years to actually be able to code a source from scratch of quality

~~Purple<3~~ · 09/15/2012, 03:34

Conquer - SX?I Hate co-sx well anyways thats just my opinion..
Urs might be diff

Spirited · 09/15/2012, 06:35

Since people are complete idiots now... let me fill you in.

Sorry for the retards. Basically, the community went through a dying period. Right now, it seems like it's at the bottom of the bottom, but high level coders (such as yourself) have started coming back and developing again. Jack (Korvacs) has assisted the Love2Hate team (a classic Conquer 1.0 server), Chris (pro4never) returns at times to help out and see how things are, CptSky has created a C# library for core elements in Conquer programming, and I've learned C# as well and been developing as the first, legal server approved by NetDragon (yes, I'm finally gloating, deal with it people). There's also Roy (InfamousNoone / Hybrid) who's been developing a sever again called "Conquer Server V3". He's in charge of the Conquer Online Underground group (which is dead... I'll revive it soon with my work). Ultimation is also a leader in the underground. KraHen has been working on hooks (which is cool), so has ImmuneOne (which has done exceptionally well). Sorry if I'm leaving a few people off... it's hard to keep track of everyone and mention everybody.

As far as sources go - all **** except for Chris's Albetros source. Conquer-SX is the worse source there is but every ****** on this forum says it's great because it has features (which are incorrectly implemented). Impulse came out with a source on patch 5165 which I recommend everyone to. You can find out about most sources here just by going to my thread (and reading my signature):

. And yah. There's not much development anymore. The people who are developing are keeping it all to themselves (like I am) because people just leech things now and sell them to people. It's pretty gross.

Welcome back.

~~I don't have a username~~ · 09/15/2012, 07:57

>Can code C# fluent
>Asks for source

Spirited · 09/15/2012, 18:41

You can't expect people to walk in fluent in C# and understand networking. It's a very advanced topic that most programmers in industry don't know how to do.

~~I don't have a username~~ · 09/15/2012, 19:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fаng

You can't expect people to walk in fluent in C# and understand networking. It's a very advanced topic that most programmers in industry don't know how to do.

That's the difference on nowing C# and knowing C# fluent. Fluent means you understand basically everything, so if he really knew C# fluent he would know network programming as well.

Also conquer doesn't really have a lot of networking, they're relying on a simple packet structure and just a client/server connection. There isn't anything advanced about a conquer server.

Spirited · 09/15/2012, 21:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by I don't have a username

That's the difference on nowing C# and knowing C# fluent. Fluent means you understand basically everything, so if he really knew C# fluent he would know network programming as well.

Also conquer doesn't really have a lot of networking, they're relying on a simple packet structure and just a client/server connection. There isn't anything advanced about a conquer server.

That's completely false... You're not in the industry. Knowing a language fluently means that you have the ability to understand additions to the basics. You can NEVER learn "basically everything" about a programming language. <.< That's such a stupid statement to make. And Conquer doesn't have a lot of networking? It's an online game.

Everything is related to networking. Every system is designed to work with the network and control network variables such as the clients (sending information to them and such).