Anti-aimbot proxy (20070514)

clinton_young · 04/05/2007, 01:35

Quote:

Originally posted by Lake292@Apr 5 2007, 01:00

localport of proxy

oh i got it now, thx a lot dude, works perfectly for me, hehe they seems like aimless to me, and they said i m speekhacker.. _|_

<hr>Append on Apr 5 2007, 01:40<hr> i m owning them all with 2 proxy

<hr>Append on Apr 5 2007, 01:42<hr> lake292 what server r u playing?

Lake292 · 04/05/2007, 01:50

not important... i would delete this ****

its just same as aimbot.... for normal players no help

darkmephisto_01 · 04/05/2007, 01:56

It works great. I have been testing it and aimbotters have a hard time to hit me (they hit me 1 out 9 times). In addition, i think it doesnt mess with normal ss or fb because when I fought with skilled fb,ss people they hit me 3 out 5 times. This proxy really shows you who is good at ss/fb and who is not but, one little detail; it is possible to make it look more natural?? It is quite obvious when you use the proxy.

mindxspike · 04/05/2007, 02:04

Fantastic job. +k to you, I am so very glad you decided to release this. I think everyone should download this, and I am sending it to people that don't even know about Epvp (a link on RS, of course). Of course an absolute elimination of QOProxy would be best, or atleast the FB/SS component of it, this is the very next best thing. It's pathetic how you and your team did more about the aimbot issue than TQ ever will. I would say to think about taking out the Cyclone feature, but that's not realistic, as that will never be stopped by anyone but TQ anyways... As for me, I couldn't give a **** about people complaining about speedhacking. It makes me Lol when known aimbotters complain about speedhacking, thinking that's the reason proxy won't hit. Congratulations, if this stays "unpatched", so to speak, you would have created a tool just as useful as the original CoTobo. This will make those low-life aimbotting nerds cry...even if it is just a little. Stick it to 'em.

a1blaster · 04/05/2007, 02:05

And everybody was paranoid about getting caught for botting, with video proof sent to GM's.

Now the video will show you teleporting around. Do you think that won't look suspicious.

tsu · 04/05/2007, 02:14

Quote:

Originally posted by a1blaster+Apr 5 2007, 02:05--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (a1blaster @ Apr 5 2007, 02:05)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>And everybody was paranoid about getting caught for botting, with video proof sent to GM's.

Now the video will show you teleporting around. Do you think that won't look suspicious.[/b]

Exactly

<!--QuoteBegin--tsu@Apr 4 2007, 02:10
EDIT: Something that itching me is how this will work against legitimate fbers.
If it is teleport/warps it will be obvious too see who is using this since you wont see the jump-animation in the air, just where they land.
And if that's frapped and sent to GM you can say bye bye to your account.[/quote]

mindxspike · 04/05/2007, 02:28

If they can aimbot and not get anything done to them, we can teleport around. It doesn't work as often as I thought it would :/ But still better than nothing, if you get especially ******.

30man · 04/05/2007, 02:48

It is NOT teleporting at all. I must explain this. We are not using teleport packet, it is not the perfect solution for us. What we did it to change the jump packet slightly to fool the server.

Other players should see you jump in a slightly differnt way, but definitely NOT teleport. There is still jump animation unless u lag too much.

Lake292 · 04/05/2007, 02:49

Quote:

Originally posted by 30man@Apr 5 2007, 02:48
It is NOT teleporting at all. I must explain this. We are not using teleport packet, it is not the perfect solution for us. What we did it to change the jump packet slightly to fool the server.

Other players should see you jump in a slightly differnt way, but definitely NOT teleport. There is still jump animation unless u lag too much.

so im too lagging with ping 200

well i need to change my provider

DM2000 · 04/05/2007, 02:55

Hi,

Thank you for your contribution, 30man (^^).

Did not see any suspicous thing around (sorry 30man, I have to check).
Yes, packet sniff if possible (glad that everyone learned to be self protect).
You no need to have the moderator to tell you whether the software is safe.
See my signature "List of links" if you need help.

I am glad that the CO community had learned to scan, packet sniff & etc (^^).
I am proud of you all (^^)

*Edit #pinned

DM

30man · 04/05/2007, 02:56

Could you pin this post if users tested and agreed it is safe?

lijian · 04/05/2007, 03:05

would tq steal ur perfect idea and do a patch on aimbot ? o.o(i am noob)

ImSnobby · 04/05/2007, 03:17

more ppl will be frapsed, i guess we will really clean the servers. rofl

Lake292 · 04/05/2007, 03:20

Quote:

Originally posted by ImSnobby@Apr 5 2007, 03:17
more ppl will be frapsed, i guess we will really clean the servers. rofl

at least its good for something

but this anti aimbot + qoproxy thats.... omfg pwnage

a1blaster · 04/05/2007, 03:33

May I ask why there is a itemtype.dat included with the DL?

It's just the original one I see.

}^~^{