|
You last visited: Today at 06:41
Advertisement
Stripped ProjectAlchemy Source Code
Discussion on Stripped ProjectAlchemy Source Code within the CO2 Bots & Macros forum part of the Conquer Online 2 category.
01/24/2011, 14:37
|
#811
|
elite*gold: 21
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,193
Received Thanks: 5,380
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stickray
Can we have more of this please?  Is this Theory also working for Fatal??
Just a yes is enough, thanks
Cheers
|
Fatal is all checked server side now (although strangely, not a speed check)
It used to be (the way I understand it) you could basically just do like
Attack foreach mob in screen
that's why the old proxies could literally attack everything on screen at once. You'd queue up like 5 attacks per mob and send that for each mob on screen then move to the next mob grouping.
That simply doesn't work anymore.
Attack packets will dc you if you send them too fast. It's something ridiculous though. I can run 50 ms attack packets without issue but it all depends on ping. Hell once or twice I ran around 30 ms attacks (we're talking just sending the same attack packet over and over here, not actual productive attacking). Tq simply dc's you if you spam packets too fast.
|
|
|
01/24/2011, 19:42
|
#812
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 676
Received Thanks: 109
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pro4never
Fatal is all checked server side now (although strangely, not a speed check)
It used to be (the way I understand it) you could basically just do like
Attack foreach mob in screen
that's why the old proxies could literally attack everything on screen at once. You'd queue up like 5 attacks per mob and send that for each mob on screen then move to the next mob grouping.
That simply doesn't work anymore.
Attack packets will dc you if you send them too fast. It's something ridiculous though. I can run 50 ms attack packets without issue but it all depends on ping. Hell once or twice I ran around 30 ms attacks (we're talking just sending the same attack packet over and over here, not actual productive attacking). Tq simply dc's you if you spam packets too fast.
|
you know P4N I use one of the old Sources of Oela .. and i can easyly use :
attack speed 50 ( 50 when i had 1 waepon -down lvl than 40)
jump update - simply 100
hitstokill 1
And its stable enought for farming ninjas ..
I got problem when i jump while hunt and fs .xD cuz the proxy gone around crazily ..
|
|
|
01/25/2011, 18:54
|
#813
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 25
Received Thanks: 8
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pro4never
Fatal is all checked server side now (although strangely, not a speed check)
It used to be (the way I understand it) you could basically just do like
Attack foreach mob in screen
that's why the old proxies could literally attack everything on screen at once. You'd queue up like 5 attacks per mob and send that for each mob on screen then move to the next mob grouping.
That simply doesn't work anymore.
Attack packets will dc you if you send them too fast. It's something ridiculous though. I can run 50 ms attack packets without issue but it all depends on ping. Hell once or twice I ran around 30 ms attacks (we're talking just sending the same attack packet over and over here, not actual productive attacking). Tq simply dc's you if you spam packets too fast.
|
Well i run now with 8 kp/s in Birds stable, just how he hits 14 kp/s sounds still like Magic for me xD
Well atm i use what i have
Cheers
|
|
|
01/25/2011, 23:23
|
#814
|
elite*gold: 223
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,076
Received Thanks: 257
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stickray
Well i run now with 8 kp/s in Birds stable, just how he hits 14 kp/s sounds still like Magic for me xD
Well atm i use what i have
Cheers
|
Yea, the people keep running over the thread that it isnt working. And they KNOW that it isnt stable now, but they keep using it. It's just stupid, they could take a break for 1 day, and it would work.
|
|
|
01/25/2011, 23:40
|
#815
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 25
Received Thanks: 8
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OELABOELA
Yea, the people keep running over the thread that it isnt working. And they KNOW that it isnt stable now, but they keep using it. It's just stupid, they could take a break for 1 day, and it would work.
|
Dude dont expect much of this Community there are alot of complainers, haters and leechers.  Its hard to keep a Project running here, i wish you good luck.
Just keep it up
|
|
|
01/26/2011, 10:03
|
#816
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 906
Received Thanks: 1,431
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OELABOELA
Yea, the people keep running over the thread that it isnt working. And they KNOW that it isnt stable now, but they keep using it. It's just stupid, they could take a break for 1 day, and it would work.
|
yea good luck with the whiners. once u release something they come out in force, and even perfection isnt good enough for their leeching *****
|
|
|
01/26/2011, 13:57
|
#817
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 541
Received Thanks: 117
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warlax
yea good luck with the whiners. once u release something they come out in force, and even perfection isnt good enough for their leeching *****
|
I agree.
|
|
|
01/26/2011, 14:39
|
#818
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 45
Received Thanks: 6
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warlax
yea good luck with the whiners. once u release something they come out in force, and even perfection isnt good enough for their leeching *****
|
I am not releasing anything. Warlax is right about this. But I am only willing to exchange programming tips and knowledge. BTW, I think I am almost done with bluemouse. Thanks to P4N for helping me on this. I have added 2 functions to initiate talk to NPC and sending response packet. You need to add delay and need to block 2032 msg to client GUI.
public static void SendNPCInit(Client C, uint NPCID)
{
byte[] Packet = new byte[16 + 8];
WriteUInt16(16, 0, Packet);
WriteUInt16(2031, 2, Packet);
WriteUInt32(NPCID, 4, Packet);
WriteString("TQClient", 16, Packet);
ToServer(Packet, C);
}
public static void SendNPCResponse(Client C, short resp)
{
byte[] Packet = new byte[16 + 8];
WriteUInt16(16, 0, Packet);
WriteUInt16(2032, 2, Packet);
WriteByte((byte)resp, 10, Packet);
WriteByte(0x65, 11, Packet);
WriteString("TQClient", 16, Packet);
ToServer(Packet, C);
}
|
|
|
01/26/2011, 15:50
|
#819
|
elite*gold: 223
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,076
Received Thanks: 257
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by argon69
I am not releasing anything. Warlax is right about this. But I am only willing to exchange programming tips and knowledge. BTW, I think I am almost done with bluemouse. Thanks to P4N for helping me on this. I have added 2 functions to initiate talk to NPC and sending response packet. You need to add delay and need to block 2032 msg to client GUI.
public static void SendNPCInit(Client C, uint NPCID)
{
byte[] Packet = new byte[16 + 8];
WriteUInt16(16, 0, Packet);
WriteUInt16(2031, 2, Packet);
WriteUInt32(NPCID, 4, Packet);
WriteString("TQClient", 16, Packet);
ToServer(Packet, C);
}
public static void SendNPCResponse(Client C, short resp)
{
byte[] Packet = new byte[16 + 8];
WriteUInt16(16, 0, Packet);
WriteUInt16(2032, 2, Packet);
WriteByte((byte)resp, 10, Packet);
WriteByte(0x65, 11, Packet);
WriteString("TQClient", 16, Packet);
ToServer(Packet, C);
}
|
Ive been working on warehouse, and p4n also helped me. So i could help you to if you want.
|
|
|
01/26/2011, 17:11
|
#820
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 951
Received Thanks: 76
|
And I`m still happy that I have a disconnect on players, mining and able to lvl waterelf. Again thanks for the help that I recieved  Still not to interested in hunting and looting and probably never will be I just got to bored of Conquer and the bulkers lol.
|
|
|
01/28/2011, 21:18
|
#821
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 268
Received Thanks: 27
|
yay i finally got logged in but the proxy crashed lol
is anyone willing 2 help make the log in more stable ??
|
|
|
01/28/2011, 22:18
|
#822
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 127
Received Thanks: 10
|
So can any1 help me how to make it more stabile and to can log easy without many DC
|
|
|
01/29/2011, 22:17
|
#823
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 951
Received Thanks: 76
|
Remember if you`re using xampp then it must be running  I have made the mistake of forgetting to open xampp and then wondered why the proxy crashed :P
|
|
|
01/29/2011, 23:58
|
#824
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 268
Received Thanks: 27
|
i haf it running n its still just stop responding as soon as i get a char logged in  and b4 u ask i havent change anything like i said im just tryin 2 get logged in so when i start coding if it stop working i know it something i coded
|
|
|
01/30/2011, 00:22
|
#825
|
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 951
Received Thanks: 76
|
Ahh sorry no idea then, had mine running for the past two days lol. It crashed on me earlier but as I said it`s because I forgot to turn xampp on lol
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
[RELEASE(SOURCE CODE)]-- KabBOT2 v1 Full Source(vb6)
10/07/2011 - Dekaron Exploits, Hacks, Bots, Tools & Macros - 106 Replies
I've been meaning to post this for awhile but I pretty much forgot about it. I've been getting quite a few requests for it so I decided to finally get around to posting it.
#1. So here you go, Just have or Download Visual Basic 6, you need to update it to VbRuntime 6 Service Pack 6.
#2. Run the file name KabBOT.vbp.
#3. Enjoy.
100% Virus Free VirusTotal.com report.
VirusTotal - Free Online Virus, Malware and URL Scanner
|
[RELEASE] [OPEN SOURCE] CE 5.5 Pointer to AutoIt Source-Code
02/13/2011 - AutoIt - 6 Replies
Habe heute erst gemerkt, dass es hier eine AutoIt Sektion gibt xD also poste ich mal mein Programm mit rein.
Funktionsweise:
1. in CE Rechtsklick auf den Pointer und auf "Copy" klicken
2. in meinem Programm auf "Code generieren" klicken
3. In euer Scite gehen und einfügen
Hier ist der Source Code vom Programm:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:41.
|
|