Aimex got detected!

[karolispanda]

The moment has finally arrived: Aimex has been detected. This is it. Another provider is about to face its downfall.

[lukedorian]

Were you using it at the time ?

[Kernaim]

F

[SyntheticSkill]

Originally Posted by karolispanda

The moment has finally arrived: Aimex has been detected. This is it. Another provider is about to face its downfall.

Aimex dev is competent, im sure they will bounce back.

[Alba_Shaor]

I'm guessing it's got something to do with the new tray icon that appeared when you launch COD?

[shavingcreme]

Originally Posted by Alba_Shaor

I'm guessing it's got something to do with the new tray icon that appeared when you launch COD?

if you go into task manager and right click on "bootstrapper" end task and it will get rid of ricochet icon

[SyntheticSkill]

Originally Posted by Alba_Shaor

I'm guessing it's got something to do with the new tray icon that appeared when you launch COD?

Completely unrelated, thats pure PR to give normal users confidence the game is secure.

[adamski1986]

Originally Posted by SyntheticSkill

Aimex dev is competent, im sure they will bounce back.

So much for the "trusted" status. Aimex always delays updates after COD patches, saying they need 2–4 days (sometimes more) to make sure it’s safe before releasing.
But let’s be honest – that didn’t help at all. Everyone got banned anyway.

The truth is:

If the core code is garbage, no amount of waiting will save you.

Doesn’t matter if they delay 3 days or 3 weeks – if it's detectable, it's detectable.
Aimex is just another low-tier, detected cheat at this point. Don’t let the fake "safety" talk fool you.

Use at your own risk – or better yet, don’t.

[OPgamingCHAIR]

Originally Posted by adamski1986

So much for the "trusted" status. Aimex always delays updates after COD patches, saying they need 2–4 days (sometimes more) to make sure it’s safe before releasing.
But let’s be honest – that didn’t help at all. Everyone got banned anyway.

The truth is:

If the core code is garbage, no amount of waiting will save you.

Doesn’t matter if they delay 3 days or 3 weeks – if it's detectable, it's detectable.
Aimex is just another low-tier, detected cheat at this point. Don’t let the fake "safety" talk fool you.

Use at your own risk – or better yet, don’t.

Iv seen some dumb **** posted on this forum, but this is definitely up their for contention of the dumbest.

It does not matter how good of a coder or programmer you are, if you are creating cheats to be used within a game protected by anti cheat, it is likely a 99.9% chance your cheat will get detected at least at once at some point, it is simply a matter of when! it has been like this since the dawn of online cheating and it will remain the same forever into the future.

Activision and Ricochet are clearly upping their game, cheating in COD has never been riskier and all providers from the best of the best to the worst are being detected.

Anyway your post is moronic.

[adamski1986]

Originally Posted by OPgamingCHAIR

Iv seen some dumb **** posted on this forum, but this is definitely up their for contention of the dumbest.

It does not matter how good of a coder or programmer you are, if you are creating cheats to be used within a game protected by anti cheat, it is likely a 99.9% chance your cheat will get detected at least at once at some point, it is simply a matter of when! it has been like this since the dawn of online cheating and it will remain the same forever into the future.

Activision and Ricochet are clearly upping their game, cheating in COD has never been riskier and all providers from the best of the best to the worst are being detected.

Anyway your post is moronic.

Yeah, no one said cheats are invincible forever – that’s not the point. The issue is how providers handle detections. If you hype up your tool as 'trusted' and still end up with mass bans, while delaying updates for “safety reasons” that clearly didn’t help, then your trust status means nothing. Users pay for reliability – not vague promises and delayed failures. At this point, Aimex is just another name on the same list

[OPgamingCHAIR]

Originally Posted by adamski1986

Yeah, no one said cheats are invincible forever – that’s not the point. The issue is how providers handle detections. If you hype up your tool as 'trusted' and still end up with mass bans, while delaying updates for “safety reasons” that clearly didn’t help, then your trust status means nothing. Users pay for reliability – not vague promises and delayed failures. At this point, Aimex is just another name on the same list

Cheats are detected usually weeks prior to banwaves actually hitting,

1. Ensure data is accurate, log cheaters ban as many as possible
2. Make it harder for cheat devs to pin point when the cheat was detected
3. Make it harder for cheat devs to pin point what was detected

There is not much a cheat developer can do about detections as mentioned about cheat gets detected, anticheats logs this, banwave pushed after X amount of time.

Dont want to get banned? Cant afford to get banned? Dont cheat, its that simple. You accept the risk the moment you inject any cheat.

[adamski1986]

Originally Posted by OPgamingCHAIR

Cheats are detected usually weeks prior to banwaves actually hitting,

1. Ensure data is accurate, log cheaters ban as many as possible
2. Make it harder for cheat devs to pin point when the cheat was detected
3. Make it harder for cheat devs to pin point what was detected

There is not much a cheat developer can do about detections as mentioned about cheat gets detected, anticheats logs this, banwave pushed after X amount of time.

Dont want to get banned? Cant afford to get banned? Dont cheat, its that simple. You accept the risk the moment you inject any cheat.

No one here is crying about the risk – that comes with the territory, and we all know it. The discussion is about transparency and quality of the product. If you advertise a tool as 'safe' or 'trusted' and then get caught in a massive wave, people will question the process – especially when devs delay updates under the claim of being cautious, only to get clapped anyway. Taking risks is fine, but selling false confidence isn’t

[Cadyss]

Originally Posted by adamski1986

No one here is crying about the risk – that comes with the territory, and we all know it. The discussion is about transparency and quality of the product. If you advertise a tool as 'safe' or 'trusted' and then get caught in a massive wave, people will question the process – especially when devs delay updates under the claim of being cautious, only to get clapped anyway. Taking risks is fine, but selling false confidence isn’t

Tell me you are new to cheating without telling me... *****

[leftyhitman]

Aimex and Dexaim haven't changed the status to detected yet!!! I use SS with EO spoofer. Everything is fine.

[crimson97]

GGz cheaters!