Engine owning or Phantom overlay

[DennisMeister69]

Originally Posted by user3030

Keep talking, everyone n their mama knows EO can’t be trusted, at least in the past 6 months. And the ( don’t cheat on accounts you don’t want to lose ) sounds exactly like what Gorilla would say in EO forums lmao

newbie.

[ebris]

Originally Posted by DennisMeister69

Even PO can be detected and it alrdy had total of two detections, any cheat can be detected. This is why i mention to not cheat on accounts you do not want to lose

I have playing always with my main account. In my life I have 2 detections one with PO but I get NOT banned. Then I switched to EO and several months later the next detection and I lost my account on EO. EO is okay when it’s not detected but the chance that you get detected is higher than with PO. At this time I am using PO and I am happy with PO. If you don’t care about your account and you want to safe money use EO. On EO the update time was very long. Sometimes 2 or 3 days longer than PO. PO is very fast. I recommend you to use PO.

[DennisMeister69]

Originally Posted by ebris

I have playing always with my main account. In my life I have 2 detections one with PO but I get NOT banned.

That's just based on luck, I have no idea how Ricochet mess things like this up, same goes for EO, some users were not banned, lol. I even know a dude who hasn't been banned from all detections from this year *****.

Originally Posted by ebris

On EO the update time was very long. Sometimes 2 or 3 days longer than PO. PO is very fast. I recommend you to use PO

Well I have explained it numerous of times in this thread why it can take longer, which is reasonable. And too bad you got banned, detections simply can happen with any provider, don't think you're undetectable.

[oxnezumi]

vanuri macro is good ans have a risk of detection?

[Fighters87]

Originally Posted by DennisMeister69

Okay, two detections, read status page, don’t try to correct buddy. Otherwise i could argue that most of EO’s detections, especially when they rely on false positive methods or only a small user base gets banned.

It’s funny to see you hyping up a provider who’s so scared of CoD removing the ability to dump signatures that he's DMing random users (me), asking to delete my posts on EPvP. Honestly i couldn’t care less about it.


If you saw what really goes on behind the scenes, you’d notice that PO or external cheats don’t get updated much to counter CoD’s new detections methods. CoD tends to focus more on detecting internal cheats like EO, and that’s been non stop over the past year. It’s not a security issue, if PO faced the same intensity as EO, he'd probably struggle and cry about CoD’s aggressive detection tactics, which sometimes even trigger false positives for legit players.

And matter of fact, where the **** did I compare PO with EO? Can you ******* read? Any big provider says to not cheat on accounts you do not want to lose.

if I were in EO, I would be ashamed to be defended by someone like you. Just read you on TG. You don't understand anything about this world and you elect yourself as a professor. For your information, I don't use internal or external.I'm going to something else. You keep redoing your fifth profile in 6 months 🤣 I will open a ticket on PO to recommend zebleer to be your student in one of your developer courses.

[DennisMeister69]

Originally Posted by Fighters87

. You don't understand anything about this world

I think you are talking about yourself

[ducksquacky]

I have both Direct and PO. Both good but personally I play very very safe with visuals and visible only.