AA vs SC

[headshotz8765]

Artificial Aiming vs System Cheats

When was last detection for either? I am wanting an internal ESP provider because of how buttery smooth it is. Havent played COD in a few years. Wanting to round out the last 3 months of MW3 before BO drops. I imagine they could give two ***** right now about going hard on cheaters since BO is coming out in 2 months.

[snomann318]

I believe AA had a recent detection if I remember correctly

[Outsider]

@

[DariXOne]

Originally Posted by headshotz8765

Artificial Aiming vs System Cheats

When was last detection for either? I am wanting an internal ESP provider because of how buttery smooth it is. Havent played COD in a few years. Wanting to round out the last 3 months of MW3 before BO drops. I imagine they could give two ***** right now about going hard on cheaters since BO is coming out in 2 months.

AA was longest UD cheat until march 18th 2024, 3 year undeteced, and hope after recent detection they will break the record again, but still there is always risk when comes to cheating, you never know when a detection happen.

[mememachinez]

Originally Posted by headshotz8765

Artificial Aiming vs System Cheats

When was last detection for either? I am wanting an internal ESP provider because of how buttery smooth it is. Havent played COD in a few years. Wanting to round out the last 3 months of MW3 before BO drops. I imagine they could give two ***** right now about going hard on cheaters since BO is coming out in 2 months.

AA is only box esp, while systemcheats has skeleton esp as well.
but AA comes with a spoofer.

imo systemcheats is more user friendly as well (i personally use it).

systemcheats currently has a 30% off sale rn, so probably a good time to buy it if u wanna give it a try.

[AGgaming]

What’s detection on system cheats?

[M364z01D]

Originally Posted by AGgaming

What’s detection on system cheats?

In the early days of WZ1, there was only one detection, which was quickly fixed. Not everyone was affected, and it was due to a bug on the systemcheat side. It was fixed after 5 hours. Also, systemcheats for MW2 and MW3 have not been detected since their release.

[i1vs9]

SC is no go for controller players i’ve asked them and they don’t support controller, so if you care about aimbot n use controller you should re consider.

[mememachinez]

Originally Posted by M364z01D

In the early days of WZ1, there was only one detection, which was quickly fixed. Not everyone was affected, and it was due to a bug on the systemcheat side. It was fixed after 5 hours. Also, systemcheats for MW2 and MW3 have not been detected since their release.

vanguard and cold war was never detected also, still on my same account

[svint]

Originally Posted by DariXOne

AA was longest UD cheat until march 18th 2024, 3 year undeteced, and hope after recent detection they will break the record again, but still there is always risk when comes to cheating, you never know when a detection happen.

though to be fair, while yes they were "UD", didn't they have a feature detection at some point during that span?

if so, I really hope we start getting away from saying "UD" because a feature like unlock all gets clipped. to me, that is still a detection because a feature someone buys and uses leads to a ban on said cheat.

[DariXOne]

Originally Posted by svint

though to be fair, while yes they were "UD", didn't they have a feature detection at some point during that span?

if so, I really hope we start getting away from saying "UD" because a feature like unlock all gets clipped. to me, that is still a detection because a feature someone buys and uses leads to a ban on said cheat.

So in that regard IW also got detected 4 times back then lol, just giving an example if we all agree with you lol. I would call AA detected if their features lets say aimbot got detected, or esp or some core features, but not something such as extra risky such as UA which had label of USE AT OWN RISK

Unlockall wasnt mandatory and was use at own risk, anyone knows UA is risky, and only those who used blueprints with UA got banned, so no it wasnt detection if you use common sense, it was extra feature with big *** warning that its USE AT OWN RISK.

[svint]

Originally Posted by DariXOne

So in that regard IW also got detected 4 times back then lol, just giving an example if we all agree with you lol. I would call AA detected if their features lets say aimbot got detected, or esp or some core features, but not something such as extra risky such as UA which had label of USE AT OWN RISK

Unlockall wasnt mandatory and was use at own risk, anyone knows UA is risky, and only those who used blueprints with UA got banned, so no it wasnt detection if you use common sense, it was extra feature with big *** warning that its USE AT OWN RISK.

Yes, in that regard, IW was detected as well. But when there are targeted bans for a feature, and it hits a said cheat, that is still a detection. I remember during IW's unlock detection, I had used some other **** around the same time, may have been RUT. No detection, so it wasn't this blanket unlock all catch like they tried to spew.

Partial detections are still detections imo. You can't claim UD for 3 years if you had any type of detection, that's silly, regardless of it's a "risky" feature or not. But I will be fair and say AA wasn't the only one who did this. Most of the providers at the time offered unlock all and only after their "feature" detections decided to drop it. That's weird, is it not? If it's a risky feature to use at your own risk, why not continue to support its usage... because it's not a cheat detection afterall, right? A bit ironic.

[mememachinez]

Originally Posted by svint

though to be fair, while yes they were "UD", didn't they have a feature detection at some point during that span?

if so, I really hope we start getting away from saying "UD" because a feature like unlock all gets clipped. to me, that is still a detection because a feature someone buys and uses leads to a ban on said cheat.

that is the most dumb logic ever....
anyone with at least 2 brain cells knows unlock all is risky and most cheats mark it as risky...

a cheat detection is when you will get banned from just loading the cheat, even if you dont use any options at all, cause the cheat its self is detected...

[DariXOne]

Originally Posted by svint

Yes, in that regard, IW was detected as well. But when there are targeted bans for a feature, and it hits a said cheat, that is still a detection. I remember during IW's unlock detection, I had used some other **** around the same time, may have been RUT. No detection, so it wasn't this blanket unlock all catch like they tried to spew.

Partial detections are still detections imo. You can't claim UD for 3 years if you had any type of detection, that's silly, regardless of it's a "risky" feature or not. But I will be fair and say AA wasn't the only one who did this. Most of the providers at the time offered unlock all and only after their "feature" detections decided to drop it. That's weird, is it not? If it's a risky feature to use at your own risk, why not continue to support its usage... because it's not a cheat detection afterall, right? A bit ironic.

Like meme said, nothing you say make sense, i understand you but it doesnt make sensw because its not logical, unlockall is not base feature, for clarifications sake, HelioS added it for raging customers because lots of them waa asking for it, it was 0 risk for those who were closet including me, so thats why again IT WAS USE AT OWN RISK XD, you cant force your unlogical reasoning onto us or anyone else because this doesnt make sense at all, its not how this works, i dont even call it feature detection as that UA was only would get activated if you enabled it yourself.

Ill stop this discussion now tbh, in past you did same thing and clarified now again you are doing it.

[svint]

Originally Posted by mememachinez

that is the most dumb logic ever....
anyone with at least 2 brain cells knows unlock all is risky and most cheats mark it as risky...

a cheat detection is when you will get banned from just loading the cheat, even if you dont use any options at all, cause the cheat its self is detected...

... and when a feature on your cheat leads to people being banned, that is a... detection? Thank you for describing what a full cheat detection was... I did not say AA had been fully detected, but ok.

I simply said you can't claim "undetected for 3 years" when your cheat had a portion of its member base banned for your method of unlock all, i.e. a detection.

Originally Posted by DariXOne

Like meme said, nothing you say make sense, i understand you but it doesnt make sensw because its not logical, unlockall is not base feature, for clarifications sake, HelioS added it for raging customers because lots of them waa asking for it, it was 0 risk for those who were closet including me, so thats why again IT WAS USE AT OWN RISK XD, you cant force your unlogical reasoning onto us or anyone else because this doesnt make sense at all, its not how this works, i dont even call it feature detection as that UA was only would get activated if you enabled it yourself.

Ill stop this discussion now tbh, in past you did same thing and clarified now again you are doing it.

Oh jesus, we're classifying detections now based on what is default enabled and what is not, that's wild. Again, a detection is a detection of any kind. I don't know why that is a hard concept to grasp. I have no issues with you Darix and have come to your defense on occasions, but this is a silly response.