[Unofficial] List of Legit / Scam COD Cheat Providers

[Fighters87]

if you want to cheat with PO, so I assume legit, I recommend you switch to permanent spoofers like sysreset/sync/sick or if you have the desire and time, you do it yourself.

[Swftzy]

Originally Posted by Garfield_

Why can't cheats support controllers natively?

Because most externals use mouse movement aimbot, which you cannot support controller support.
While some externals use memory aimbot which can support controller natively but adds a detection vector.

[000xx9]

INTERWEBZ MW3 cheat just released.

[zebleer]

Originally Posted by Slwstv

Ok thanks. & as far as the USB inject goes is there a tutorial on how to do it? & im using EO spoofer. Do i spoof first or inject PO cheat first?

You should spoof first and lock PO's loader to your spoofed HWIDs. That way if you close the game or the game crashes (not unheard of with COD), you can just insert USB, inject PO again, remove USB, boot game again. If you did it in reverse, then you'd have to reboot PC to undo the spoof so you can inject PO again. Not a good way to do it

So the official steps would be

1. Boot PC
2. Insert USB
3. Spoof EO
4. Inject PO
5. Remove USB
6. Boot launcher (BNET/Steam) then game
7. Boot game
8. If game closes or crashes, close launcher, insert USB, inject PO, remove USB then boot game again
9. When done cheating on target game, Restart PC to kill spoof and clean everything related to PO before you do other games

The launchers don't really grab anything concerning right now but I like to tell people to close launchers when injecting too just because that could technically change in the future especially BNET

Originally Posted by Garfield_

Why can't cheats support controllers natively?

They can it just adds new detection vectors. Using view angles for aimbot to help support controller adds vectors and so does using controller input

I'd rather just avoid all of that. I want to server my customers features that are safe. I want to keep my detection vectors as low as possible even at the cost of native/better controller support

Controller users can still use remapping with PO or just input directly with walls only

Originally Posted by ksarisky

guys i got my bann on main account from last detect for PO then i create new account so i basically i want to play legit after 1 game i got shadow bann and now the new account is under review so it will be under review for how long time ? after that ill got perma banned ? or what ? how long time the hwid banned for ever or weeks months ? , thanks

After a perma ban, it is normal for the new account to get an immediate shadow ban. Just wait it out. If it lifts, you are not HWID banned

Originally Posted by mememachinez

Load PO then enable EO spoofer then run the game.
If your game has to restart to update or whatever, just disable EO spoofer, reload PO then enable EO spoofer again and run the game again.

I didn't realize you could disable EO spoofer without needing to Restart PC

My steps above are what I give to anyone who has a spoofer that can spoof the same HWIDs over and over because most of them can't do that

Nice info to know

[mememachinez]

Originally Posted by zebleer

You should spoof first and lock PO's loader to your spoofed HWIDs. That way if you close the game or the game crashes (not unheard of with COD), you can just insert USB, inject PO again, remove USB, boot game again. If you did it in reverse, then you'd have to reboot PC to undo the spoof so you can inject PO again. Not a good way to do it

So the official steps would be

1. Boot PC
2. Insert USB
3. Spoof EO
4. Inject PO
5. Remove USB
6. Boot launcher (BNET/Steam) then game
7. Boot game
8. If game closes or crashes, close launcher, insert USB, inject PO, remove USB then boot game again
9. When done cheating on target game, Restart PC to kill spoof and clean everything related to PO before you do other games

The launchers don't really grab anything concerning right now but I like to tell people to close launchers when injecting too just because that could technically change in the future especially BNET


They can it just adds new detection vectors. Using view angles for aimbot to help support controller adds vectors and so does using controller input

I'd rather just avoid all of that. I want to server my customers features that are safe. I want to keep my detection vectors as low as possible even at the cost of native/better controller support

Controller users can still use remapping with PO or just input directly with walls only


After a perma ban, it is normal for the new account to get an immediate shadow ban. Just wait it out. If it lifts, you are not HWID banned


I didn't realize you could disable EO spoofer without needing to Restart PC

My steps above are what I give to anyone who has a spoofer that can spoof the same HWIDs over and over because most of them can't do that

Nice info to know

Yeah most helpful thing in a spoofer, when u wanna pair it with another cheat

[Xenos]

Originally Posted by 000xx9

INTERWEBZ MW3 cheat just released.

Added

[Joycap]

why is kern listed as trusted @ how much he pay you bro? I got perma 2 week ago on MW2 using them and they lied about their detection n covered it up.

[44Hawaii]

Anyone know if systemcheats are internal or external?

[DariXOne]

Originally Posted by 44Hawaii

Anyone know if systemcheats are internal or external?

Internal

[44Hawaii]

Anyone know if any of these are external besides PO. I don’t trust PO no more, lol. Dev letting people inject while knowing it’s detected. And they’re getting way too popular. Bunch of YouTube videos bout them. Activision coming for them 😂 like EO

[DariXOne]

Originally Posted by 44Hawaii

Anyone know if any of these are external besides PO. I don’t trust PO no more, lol. Dev letting people inject while knowing it’s detected. And they’re getting way too popular. Bunch of YouTube videos bout them. Activision coming for them 😂 like EO

The amount of people who took zebleers words out of context is too **** high, he was open about the situation and clarified everything in truth i guess most of you like getting lied to instead.

They had 1 detection means oh they are next EO, the situation with EO was different because they are madlads who messed with activision on social media non stop, PO situation is different, if thats the case for most of you then put IW and other providers who got derectwd in mw2 in same category, why only PO xD.

[44Hawaii]

Originally Posted by DariXOne

The amount of people who took zebleers words out of context is too **** high, he was open about the situation and clarified everything in truth i guess most of you like getting lied to instead.

They had 1 detection means oh they are next EO, the situation with EO was different because they are madlads who messed with activision on social media non stop, PO situation is different, if thats the case for most of you then put IW and other providers who got derectwd in mw2 in same category, why only PO xD.

I’m not saying their detection rate is like EO. I’m saying they’re getting way to popular like EO. A lot of streamers know about PO and make videos. It’s only a matter of time that activision catches wind. IW ain’t as known as PO.

[zebleer]

Originally Posted by 44Hawaii

Anyone know if any of these are external besides PO. I don’t trust PO no more, lol. Dev letting people inject while knowing it’s detected. And they’re getting way too popular. Bunch of YouTube videos bout them. Activision coming for them �� like EO

I postponed my detection announcement by a few days to run since tests for a conclusion to what got detected since they were instant banning in the MW3 beta. 22 accounts got unnecessarily banned as a result and I apologized to those 22 people but everyone else's ban was already coming. The cost of coming back stronger within 2 weeks of the first ban was 22 accounts. I will never have to do it that way again either trust me

You might be surprised to hear that most providers do much worse. I know of providers who have guessed at what got detected, pushed an attempted fix, then let their entire user base back on not knowing if the detection is even fixed getting them all waved and HWID banned as a result for the sake of easier testing from paying users. The difference is that I was open about what I did in my announcement & they hide it

Phantom Overlay 2.0 is very secure. It is more secure by so much and has much higher performance. I do not think Ricochet will be able to get me the way they did ever again. Even the best providers in COD these days have one detection but I will do everything I can to keep PO at one

Originally Posted by 44Hawaii

I’m not saying their detection rate is like EO. I’m saying they’re getting way to popular like EO. A lot of streamers know about PO and make videos. It’s only a matter of time that activision catches wind. IW ain’t as known as PO.

I don't think Activision cares about what the hacker hunter YouTubers say at all. I think they are watching social media such as TikTok/Twitter/Instagram/Reddit for viral cheat clips/ads where PO is no where to be seen compared to the other providers you've named

The hacker hunters barely name me also

[0x41^4]

Originally Posted by DariXOne

The amount of people who took zebleers words out of context is too **** high, he was open about the situation and clarified everything in truth i guess most of you like getting lied to instead.

They had 1 detection means oh they are next EO, the situation with EO was different because they are madlads who messed with activision on social media non stop, PO situation is different, if thats the case for most of you then put IW and other providers who got derectwd in mw2 in same category, why only PO xD.

Let's also keep in mind that EO had back-to-back detections days after they "fixed" the first detection.

Let's also keep in mind that during EO's first detection, not only were they blaming the customers and calling them all retards (verbatim), they were fake injecting to show customers it was safe.

PO has been updated for almost a month without issues.

[EngineOwning]

Originally Posted by 0x41^4

Let's also keep in mind that EO had back-to-back detections days after they "fixed" the first detection.

Could you please tell me more about that?
We always are and were exceptionally transparent about detections. We even have a public log of every status change in our since July.

Originally Posted by 0x41^4

Let's also keep in mind that during EO's first detection, not only were they blaming the customers and calling them all retards (verbatim), they were fake injecting to show customers it was safe.

PO has been updated for almost a month without issues.

When making such claims you should provide some evidence, also what the hell is "fake injecting"