Bogdy's Research

[bog18dy]

Edited.

[Alurion]

When you say: it's there, someone posted it or?

[bog18dy]

Originally Posted by Alurion

When you say: it's there, someone posted it or?

2008/2009 was posted on CN forums (a lot of them have just partial source), but it was on some of them.

2015 not posted.

What I meant is that some key people have them, look around and negociate, depending on how valuable it is to you, you can waste some money on it, but you might be disappointed, because there's lots of work to be done, trust me.

[madmerlin3009]

4) KR 2009 server can be made to work, the binaries odasm released on ******** are good and working, the DB is good aswell. Get the 2009 client and start reading up the source, the client is compilable, although it misses some .cpps, it has the .objs to make up for it.

This is important as it will allow you to use source LS/DS/MS also compilable. The DS/client connection I think can be twicked such that you can add GS-like functionality to the DS, so not having he GS source and just using the one from odasm's release might work.


naa i dont agree. have you seen the source to ds vs 2007 m8.? have you seen the stored procedure calls.

2013 source is a needle in a haystack. unless japan are stupid enough to leave their web dirs unsecured

[bog18dy]

Originally Posted by madmerlin3009

4) KR 2009 server can be made to work, the binaries odasm released on ******** are good and working, the DB is good aswell. Get the 2009 client and start reading up the source, the client is compilable, although it misses some .cpps, it has the .objs to make up for it.

This is important as it will allow you to use source LS/DS/MS also compilable. The DS/client connection I think can be twicked such that you can add GS-like functionality to the DS, so not having he GS source and just using the one from odasm's release might work.


naa i dont agree. have you seen the source to ds vs 2007 m8.? have you seen the stored procedure calls.

2013 source is a needle in a haystack. unless japan are stupid enough to leave their web dirs unsecured

Exactly mardu, I said that some packet sizes might not match, but look what I mean, the odasm release is 2008 actually or even 2009 don't remember.

Source is 2009, you can downgrade because source is newer than binaries and it will work, ofc there's work.

P.S. I still think z9d and you not joining was a huge mistake, basically, that led to both servers dying off.

ALSO, you can downgrade very nicely, you know why, if you're a smarty, you'll figure the documentation for LS/DS/LOG/MS, in the documentation it says EXACTLY with dates what features were added when, guess what, you remove all those one by one and you got yourself a DS 2008 server

[madmerlin3009]

Originally Posted by bog18dy

Exactly mardu, I said that some packet sizes might not match, but look what I mean, the odasm release is 2008 actually or even 2009 don't remember.

Source is 2009, you can downgrade because source is newer than binaries and it will work, ofc there's work.

P.S. I still think z9d and you not joining was a huge mistake, basically, that led to both servers dying off.

ALSO, you can downgrade very nicely, you know why, if you're a smarty, you'll figure the documentation for LS/DS/LOG/MS, in the documentation it says EXACTLY with dates what features were added when, guess what, you remove all those one by one and you got yourself a DS 2008 server

one thing i respect from you and adek.is your ability to diversify.the fact of the matter i want to clarify. your comprensive explanation about this 2007 aging content. in my eyes. everyone has their own judgement to accept what 9d is about. we are now looking at a new generation of players.all asking the same question. what is 9dragon. your assertation to the code you delivered 2012 ds server. i will be now looking to see if we have an upgrade from 2007.persnally i dont think the new libraries were actually added. i might be wrong. i now have the 2009 content and am diversifying if what you speculated earlier from a post can actualy . i will now corralate your last post with success or fail. lets see. i will post on elite your views. i am sure alot of people wanting to start private servers need to know where they stand

[bog18dy]

Originally Posted by madmerlin3009

one thing i respect from you and adek.is your ability to diversify.the fact of the matter i want to clarify. your comprensive explanation about this 2007 aging content. in my eyes. everyone has their own judgement to accept what 9d is about. we are now looking at a new generation of players.all asking the same question. what is 9dragon. your assertation to the code you delivered 2012 ds server. i will be now looking to see if we have an upgrade from 2007.persnally i dont think the new libraries were actually added. i might be wrong. i now have the 2009 content and am diversifying if what you speculated earlier from a post can actualy . i will now corralate your last post with success or fail. lets see. i will post on elite your views. i am sure alot of people wanting to start private servers need to know where they stand

It's a lot of work, probably associated with failure for most, even for me it was a failure, but I didn't give it my best since we decided to update us 2012 binaries since 2009 lacked a lot of features that we'd have to recode.

[uno.minhtuan]

@ you can give me EU server files? I really need it

2) the EU binaries can be made to work. Hint, read the public DS source, make a mid server and use US_DS (EU bins are missing DS), capture packets and resend them with good size to GS, this will get you OX and refine +13++.

[xtJamie]

This is a wealth of information that anyone in development should be ******* bending over for Bogdy. Respect to him for still keeping the idea alive but this is just a dead cause and why are people still trying to get this working....

As for 1.5... Yeah... Not going to happen.