Project Sylvanass

Malevolent0 · 08/22/2025, 14:26

Well, guess Project Sylvanas was hit once again?

tamedbeast · 08/22/2025, 16:10

I mean, why is anyone surprised? It's internal, and it's going to get detected more, just like every memory-based product that writes to memory. If you're on a public platform, expect bans at some point.

The irony really comes from the developer's attitude; they went from thinking they defeated Blizzard to being defeated several times by Blizzard, and it's not over. Blizzard is going to constantly be detecting them going forward. That goes for basically every publicly available bot.

Bowerzx · 08/25/2025, 00:47

I've been using for the last month or so not seen anything hit? :S

tamedbeast · 08/25/2025, 00:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowerzx

I've been using for the last month or so not seen anything hit? :S

Clearly, either you haven't, or you've been missing for the last week. There was a significant number of users who got banned within the last week or so using Project Sylvanas.

Bowerzx · 08/25/2025, 00:59

Nope played every day, maybe others were not so lucky!

tamedbeast · 08/25/2025, 01:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowerzx

I've been using for the last month or so not seen anything hit? :S

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowerzx

Nope played every day, maybe others were not so lucky!

I call CAP since it was down for a while during the time this was happening.

Bowerzx · 08/25/2025, 01:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by tamedbeast

I call CAP since it was down for a while during the time this was happening.

Yes there was a downtime of 2-3 days but not heard of any bans,

I have active sub,

tamedbeast · 08/25/2025, 01:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowerzx

Yes there was a downtime of 2-3 days but not heard of any bans,

I have active sub,

Yeah, cool. Anyway, there were many bans, which is why it was down.

Monkeywiggly · 08/26/2025, 13:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by tamedbeast

Yeah, cool. Anyway, there were many bans, which is why it was down.

"Many" is a long stretch, only seen a few.

Damnright · 08/26/2025, 14:00

As far as I know, about 20 to 30 were banned. That's unfortunate, but the vast majority are still active.

So “hit” is an extremely big word for something so small.

Astraelyn · 08/26/2025, 14:13

Not hit yet been playing daily pretty much and 2nd account been using another platform 80€ a month because i mean NN or any pixel ? /lol

tamedbeast · 08/26/2025, 15:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damnright

As far as I know, about 20 to 30 were banned. That's unfortunate, but the vast majority are still active.

So “hit” is an extremely big word for something so small.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monkeywiggly

"Many" is a long stretch, only seen a few.

You can both downplay it all you want and use all the wordsmithing you want, but at the end of the day, it was detected. That's it, that's all.

Just because PS "said", it was about 30-odd users that got banned, doesn't make it a fact. There is always their side, the middle ground, and the truth, and I'm sure it was far more than what they report, because at the end of the day, most of these bot owners are going to downplay the damage in an effort to protect their brand image so their customer base doesnt flee, something that Silvi is extremely obsessed about, so I wouldn't be surprised if that count is straight-up off by a long shot.

But what is a fact is that it was hard detected. End of story, doesn't matter the count.

Why anyone would come and try to play it off like it never happened is just strange to me. Nothing says shill like sweeping the truth under the rug and parroting the propaganda that is fed to them from their cult leader and just posting it as if it's some type of fact.

Damnright · 08/26/2025, 16:00

It happened. However, it only affected a very small number of active users, and measures have been taken to prevent it from happening again. At least, that's how it was communicated (hence the downtime).

The reports of bans come from the people who were banned. They are all publicly visible in the channel's chat history. This is visible to any outside third party.

I have used all kinds of providers in the past, and nowhere else has it been as transparent as at PS. It seems as if you are on a personal vendetta.

Monkeywiggly · 08/26/2025, 16:14

PS didn't give a number, I am going of the handful of people saying so in discord. IF it was detected then there would be a wave, there wasn't. Not sure why you try to slander PS.

tamedbeast · 08/26/2025, 16:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damnright

It happened. However, it only affected a very small number of active users, and measures have been taken to prevent it from happening again. At least, that's how it was communicated (hence the downtime).

The reports of bans come from the people who were banned. They are all publicly visible in the channel's chat history. This is visible to any outside third party.

I have used all kinds of providers in the past, and nowhere else has it been as transparent as at PS. It seems as if you are on a personal vendetta.

How much did you get paid to come out and shill for Silvi? Sounds like something written by the propaganda department at Project Sylvanas.

Nothing personal about posting facts. Project Sylvanas was detected, and many users got banned. That's the facts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monkeywiggly

PS didn't give a number, I am going of the handful of people saying so in discord. IF it was detected then there would be a wave, there wasn't. Not sure why you try to slander PS.

Saying it got detected and users got banned is slander now? Lmao, tell me you're a shill without telling me you're a shill.

I bet you guys all have a private Discord channel where you come onto the forums to sway public opinion after a detection happened, or try to up play the rotations to make it seem like they're better than they are

Go back to your echo chamber in PS Discord and glaze each other.