Official Xigncode(AntiCheats) Topic

MRx86™ · 04/04/2015, 15:05

XignCode

Xigncode which is provided by wellbia.

Lets talk about this anticheats which will be really soon the new anticheats for every nexon game. WR.CA.ETC ETC!

The contract with the ahnlabs is finally finished. and nexon has decided to not renew it. and switching to the xingcode. let's talk together about this anticheats

For the EPVP Moderator Team. when this notice will be official to nexon website. Please PIN this topic.

const* · 04/04/2015, 17:20

Do you know more about that? Will that be better?

n4n033 · 04/04/2015, 17:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by *static_cast

Do you know more about that? Will that be better?

Depends for who, better because there will be much less cheats when it will be implemented so while coders will be working on XIGN bypass there'll be no more hacks

Zn1337 · 04/04/2015, 19:40

Xigncode detects Windows API. Using CreateThread won't work.
Creating hacks will become really different.

~~ryaN.jeZoo~~ · 04/04/2015, 19:50

Hay.
I have an XIGN Cleaner.
Download:

Have fun.

mfg.

xKahba · 04/04/2015, 20:15

Mal gucken .. Wird schon irgendwie gehen. Ich meine wir Coder aus der WR-Scene sind ja jetzt nicht vom Mond und habe in der Zeit bereits vieles über Hooking ect. gelernt.

Sleutel · 04/05/2015, 15:12

I can't believe that this topic already turned out into a off-topic discussion on who's English is better. Anyways, anti-cheats aren't flawless so there will be a ways of bypassing this. I'm really wondering how they will implement it inside WarRock. This might affect private servers as well.

And btw..
When warrock is no more = correct, only the t needs to be dropped from the not.
Off-topic discussion 1 ended, now back on-topic please.

Omdi · 04/05/2015, 16:46

XTrap would have been a better choice

MRx86™ · 04/05/2015, 16:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omdihar

XTrap would have been a better choice

Not really. since xigncode have better sys supports.
Xtrap would be more easy with some sys knowledge.

Omdi · 04/05/2015, 16:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by GHTheBoss

Not really. since xigncode have better sys supports.
Xtrap would be more easy with some sys knowledge.

Are you familiar with both AC's or how do you know that?
IMO XTrap was pretty good

MRx86™ · 04/05/2015, 16:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omdihar

Are you familiar with both AC's or how do you know that?
IMO XTrap was pretty good

xtrap is still awesome and pretty good anticheats.
yes i'm familiar with both anticheats. and i can still xtrap is an awesome anticheats with their trick they detecting everything.

but xigncode is way a better due to his awesome driver.

const* · 04/05/2015, 17:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omdihar

XTrap would have been a better choice

Well, as far as I know Crossfire EU/NA had it - and as you might know, there were lots of cheaters/hackers...?

Omdi · 04/05/2015, 17:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by *static_cast

Well, as far as I know Crossfire EU/NA had it - and as you might know, there were lots of cheaters/hackers...?

It had a few security holes but to be perfectly honest, as other Anti-Cheats go XTrap was in fact pretty decent.

const* · 04/05/2015, 17:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omdihar

It had a few security holes but to be perfectly honest, as other Anti-Cheats go XTrap was in fact pretty decent.

Do you think Xigncode will change something? Not only for some days, what I mean is over a longer span of time - 1, 2, 3 years...?

Omdi · 04/05/2015, 17:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by *static_cast

Do you think Xigncode will change something? Not only for some days, what I mean is over a longer span of time - 1, 2, 3 years...?

I never had to deal with it, so it is kinda hard to give you an answer