[Ksro]Sloke_Chat reader_V1

[blackeagle93]

=.-: he didnt steal it...he asked if acer can release the source - only you are mixing up things
if acer cares, he can write to this forum too...but i think he is happy that his tool is remade for another version of silkroad coz he also helped to get it done

[=.-]

Originally Posted by lesderid

Do you think I care? It was meant open-source but I forgot to pack it in the archive xD

And I'll quote something too:
"Software is like sex; it's better when it's free." -Linus Torvalds

Free as in the Linux kernel, not as in beer...

Originally Posted by blackeagle93

=.-: he didnt steal it...he asked if acer can release the source - only you are mixing up things
if acer cares, he can write to this forum too...but i think he is happy that his tool is remade for another version of silkroad coz he also helped to get it done

Ok. I clear up the facts: I gave leserid the source, he will not decline that, i wrote up some things he only can know, cause of the pms i had with him, on my other account, recking, leserid can either accept that, or you can add me at , thats the msn i used on recking, so add, if you dont trust.

acer pmed me later, told me he was angry on me, that i gave leserid the source, the difference from what i did and he did, that i did in not a single moment in public. And i would never come up with the fucking idea for asking for thx, just because i made a source public with a software a 12 year old kid can use.

[acer20006]

Originally Posted by =.-

"Do not to your neighbor what you would take ill from him." – Pittacus

Originally Posted by lesderid

Do you think I care? It was meant open-source but I forgot to pack it in the archive xD
And I'll quote something too:
"Software is like sex; it's better when it's free." -Linus Torvalds
Free as in the Linux kernel, not as in beer...

Originally Posted by =.-

it wasnt meant as open source by acer, i can assure you. so dont mix up things. its not yours, its still acer. Dont mix Open Source, which is the best what happended to software at all time, with just adding some lines to a given thing. I regret giving you the source, and you didnt even had a clue at first, that it was the complete source, u were such an noob u belived it was fucked up...
best regards, enterpise, aka mroetchkaifnugcka

Originally Posted by blackeagle93

=.-: he didnt steal it...he asked if acer can release the source - only you are mixing up things
if acer cares, he can write to this forum too...but i think he is happy that his tool is remade for another version of silkroad coz he also helped to get it done

_____ i was intended to make one for Csro beside he asked to release the source, but i didn't release it
& why i write my complain to forum ? is that will make him stop ? he took the source from recking not from me,
and i'm not very happy , someone use my code to put his name on it,even without mention the name of code owner , yaa that's make me extremely happy

Originally Posted by =.-

Ok. I clear up the facts: I gave leserid the source, he will not decline that, i wrote up some things he only can know, cause of the pms i had with him, on my other account, recking, leserid can either accept that, or you can add me at , thats the msn i used on recking, so add, if you dont trust.

acer pmed me later, told me he was angry on me, that i gave leserid the source, the difference from what i did and he did, that i did in not a single moment in public. And i would never come up with the fucking idea for asking for thx, just because i made a source public with a software a 12 year old kid can use.

yes , that's right i PM recking asking him how he cracked my code ? i spend hours to calculate the packets and make the right sequent in code .......
u de-compiled it & he public it

now my code is public , what a joy

[lesderid]

Originally Posted by =.-

it wasnt meant as open source by acer, i can assure you. so dont mix up things. its not yours, its still acer. Dont mix Open Source, which is the best what happended to software at all time, with just adding some lines to a given thing. I regret giving you the source, and you didnt even had a clue at first, that it was the complete source, u were such an noob u belived it was ****** up...
best regards, enterpise, aka ◦mroetchkaifnugcka

Yeah it's true, I didn't know it because I didn't know how an AutoIt exe was 'compiled'. Now I know that all the included files are placed in the same file.

By the way:
#Reported:
*Breaking 'Da Rulez' (Multi Accounting; other account is 'recking')
*Insulting (see last line; see ◦)

@Acer: Click the about button, I changed it for (possible) further releases:



Is that better?

[acer20006]

Originally Posted by lesderid

Yeah it's true, I didn't know it because I didn't know how an AutoIt exe was 'compiled'. Now I know that all the included files are placed in the same file.

By the way:
#Reported:
*Breaking 'Da Rulez' (Multi Accounting; other account is 'recking')
*Insulting (see last line; see ◦)

@Acer: Click the about button, I changed it for (possible) further releases:



Is that better?

i didn't see that before , thx for changing the label name too..... but it still coz of u both my code become public

[blackeagle93]

and now the uniques! ^^

[lesderid]

Originally Posted by acer20006

i didn't see that before , thx for changing the label name too

What license do you want on it now that the source is public?
Personally I think GPLv3 is OK.

Originally Posted by blackeagle93

and now the uniques! ^^

Working on that and the normal chat character names.
They are pretty easy, PSEUDOCode:

OnCharacterSpawn
{
	$SpawnID = [CalculateSpawnIDFromPacket]
	If Not (IsDeclared($ID))
		$CharName = [CalculateCharNameFromPacket]
		Assign($ID), $CharName)
	EndIf
}

On the chat message part:

OnNormalMessage
{
	$Message = [CalculateMessageFromPacket]
	$ID = [CalculateSenderIDFromPacket]
	DisplayMessage(Eval($ID) & "(Chat)" & $Message)
}

[DuTcHtUrK]

Lol.. nice Conversation

[acer20006]

it's O.K

[=.-]

Originally Posted by lesderid

Yeah it's true, I didn't know it because I didn't know how an AutoIt exe was 'compiled'. Now I know that all the included files are placed in the same file.

By the way:
#Reported:
*Breaking 'Da Rulez' (Multi Accounting; other account is 'recking')
*Insulting (see last line; see ◦)

@Acer: Click the about button, I changed it for (possible) further releases:



Is that better?

true. multi accounting is illegal, but only use it in the same time... This account here was created in the time when recking was banned, banned by myself on demand, recking was reactivated for a certain time, but i decided to bann it myself again, just by changing the pw to a random one and changing the email to a non existent, so u wont see the "recking" account ever online again... so report whatever u want, you noobish child. wait, i´ll report that myself.


/sarcasm.

You ways of behavouir now show only that i was right with all what i said, and im happy that your changed your mind.

[megaman963]

Sorry for cut the flame ...

but is there another release for KSRO ??

because im waiting it for a long time

And i have reupload sloke chat for mirror

[acer20006]

Originally Posted by megaman963

Sorry for cut the flame ...

but is there another release for KSRO ??

because im waiting it for a long time

And i have reupload sloke chat for mirror

yes . but not now _ it will be after the new legend
Sloke will support send (party-all-PM-uni-Academy-Guild) (i finished it_but there are some bugs need to fix)