Iphone vs Android

[glaitaht]

Hello, i am using xiaomi redmi right now, and probably in a few months i'll change it, i am thinking buying iphone but its cost a lot and actualy nothing much than android, what should i do?

[QuzFlips]

I'd personally say stick with android. They are cheaper, more features.

[SnoopDawg420]

Iphones are deffo higher quality than androids. But androids are cheaper yes. You just need to choose it for your self.

[OpyOp]

Depends which model u gonna buy. But i prefer iphone, better quality, better futures, updates don’t slow your phone as android does. Ofc android has better assistant(Android assistant beats siri)

[JSP!]

android forever. way more friendly userface and for me : easier to use

[ArcaneSmurfs]

I used to use iPhones, i couldn't change it for android.

[Natsu Dragneel]

iPhone bro

[Zypr]

I went from an Iphone 6 Plus to a Huawei Mate 20 Pro, then to a Oneplus 8 and now i'm back to an Iphone 13. I used Android intensively and all my devices were always rooted. But in the end, i'm glad to be back with the Iphone. iOS is much more intuitive and easier to use. iOS definitely has more functions and features. Apps on iOS are usually better programmed. Anyone who thinks that Android is better has simply never used iOS properly. In my opinion, there is clearly no better smartphone than the IPhone.

[huzeo]

Ios for usually, android for coding

[Skylight2512]

According to me you use both phone because you have not much experience about iPhone and it's features. So first start using your new iPhone and as well as use android also.

After few months which you like most then continue with it.

[swagmeisterCx]

Android holds the leaders of the phone industry - nothing can change that. ♥

[Zubatque]

The iPhone is for those who are willing to pay for the brand. According to the hardware itself and the characteristics , there are much cheaper and no less high-quality competitors

[Bench]

Originally Posted by Zubatque

The iPhone is for those who are willing to pay for the brand. According to the hardware itself and the characteristics , there are much cheaper and no less high-quality competitors

That is a thesis that cannot be left standing like that. You can also turn it around and claim that people who buy a flagship device from Samsung or Oneplus pay for the name.

You should generally not compare iPhones and Android devices directly. The systems work much too differently for this. Accordingly, an Apple iPhone requires much less hardware performance than an Android device. For example, 4 GB of working memory is completely sufficient for an iPhone, whereas an Android device quickly reaches its limit with 8 GB. The same applies to other components like the battery or the processor.

[Zubatque]

Originally Posted by Bench

That is a thesis that cannot be left standing like that. You can also turn it around and claim that people who buy a flagship device from Samsung or Oneplus pay for the name.

You should generally not compare iPhones and Android devices directly. The systems work much too differently for this. Accordingly, an Apple iPhone requires much less hardware performance than an Android device. For example, 4 GB of working memory is completely sufficient for an iPhone, whereas an Android device quickly reaches its limit with 8 GB. The same applies to other components like the battery or the processor.

It is quite possible that 4 gigabytes of ram is enough for an iPhone, but for the same money you can buy phones that will have 20 gigabytes of ram) Well, as for the lack of using an iPhone for beginners, I'm generally silent. In general, this is the same classic dispute as "chicken or egg", "Windows or linux", etc.)

[Bench]

Originally Posted by Zubatque

It is quite possible that 4 gigabytes of ram is enough for an iPhone, but for the same money you can buy phones that will have 20 gigabytes of ram) Well, as for the lack of using an iPhone for beginners, I'm generally silent. In general, this is the same classic dispute as "chicken or egg", "Windows or linux", etc.)

Of course, you can get "better hardware" or more correctly: "more hardware performance" for an identical price, but this is currently less sensible from Apple's point of view because it would also bring negative points, such as higher battery consumption. A bigger battery would have to be installed and more space would have to be provided for the device. I don't want to defend the point that you pay a lot for the name at Apple, but you also do that at many Android manufacturers, such as Samsung, Huawei, SONY or Huawei (in terms of the flagships of the respective manufacturers).