[Release] HGWC Bypass (+function source)

[onahoe]

Yo, today i want to release my hgwc bypass.
remember: this is not a x-trap bypass!
a >><< can be found here

[Screen]

 Spoiler

[How to?]

-Download and unpack the zip-archive
-Start "onomato - HGWC Bypass.exe" as administrator
-Start S4League

[Main-Functions]

-file detection (you can edit resources or play with older patches..)
-ban (you can't get banned by using hacks..)

[Download & VT]

You can download it by clicking the attachment.
VT - HGWC.dll:
VT - Injector:

Have fun
And remember: It will not work if the hgwc console isnt writing:


0815 Function-src:

 Spoiler

PHP Code:

#define TRUE FALSE //lol

class HGWC
{

public:

    int HGWC::FileDetection(int);
    int HGWC::KeepAlive(int);
    int HGWC::Bann(int);
    int HGWC::Thread(int);
}rect;

int HGWC::FileDetection(int LParam)
{
    memcpy((LPVOID)0x0040CAE1,(LPVOID)"\xEB",1);
    return 0;
}

int HGWC::KeepAlive(int LParam)
{
    memcpy((LPVOID)0x0040D5B7,(LPVOID)"\xEB",1);
    return 0;
}

int HGWC::Bann(int LParam)
{
    memcpy((LPVOID)0x0040F9FD,(LPVOID)"\xEB",1);
    memcpy((LPVOID)0x0040FA31,(LPVOID)"\xEB",1);
    memcpy((LPVOID)0x0040FB71,(LPVOID)"\xC2\x0C\x00\x90\x90",5);
    memcpy((LPVOID)0x00410270,(LPVOID)"\xC2\x0C\x00\x90\x90",5);
    return 0;
}

int HGWC::Thread(int LParam)
{
    memcpy((LPVOID)0x0040D4E3,(LPVOID)"\x6A\x7D",2);
    memcpy((LPVOID)0x00418F91,(LPVOID)"\xEB\x0A",2);
    memcpy((LPVOID)0x00464147,(LPVOID)"\x68\xFF\x08\x00\x00",5);
    memcpy((LPVOID)0x00410270,(LPVOID)"\xC2\x0C\x00\x90\x90",5);
    return 0;
} 


[Omdi]

approved

[Dark Ghost]

Thanks you

[A4Hack]

Xtrap bypass?

[onahoe]

Originally Posted by A4Hack

Xtrap bypass?

->

a >><< can be found here

[REDAPRO]

it make to me this so work ????? [IMG]https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=323939061081202&set=gm.463681110412 981&type=1&relevant_count=1******nf[/IMG]

it make to me this so work ?????

it make to me this so work ?????

[onahoe]

Originally Posted by REDAPRO

it make to me this so work ????? [IMG]https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=323939061081202&set=gm.463681110412 981&type=1&relevant_count=1******nf[/IMG]

it make to me this so work ?????

it make to me this so work ?????

"Successfully injected" means that the bypass is working on hgwc..
if there is a message "Bypassed HGWC " the bypass is working.

[ahmedxxx]

Don't Work

[99xX77z99xXx]

THANKS

[▒ Ant.]

Followed your instructions, just like any other hack. Opened the injector, and as soon as HGWC.exe pops up it goes to this then disappears. :

[onahoe]

Originally Posted by Alucard1113

Followed your instructions, just like any other hack. Opened the injector, and as soon as HGWC.exe pops up it goes to this then disappears. :

Read my last sentence in the thread and try again.

[jhonatasaz]

You say to read the last line in the post. HGWC not strategic writing this I did not understand what it is to explain it. For I am with an error Chamdo "Found! Try to inject" Windows 7 64-bit.

[snow]

You have some serious resource leak issues in your code. Try using a local private variable for your HANDLE and call OpenProcess in your constructor. Use CloseHandle in your destructor, otherwise the system has no chance to know you're done with those process handles. At the moment you're using 10 handles, that's not healthy.

Oh, and if you're using that code within the targets address space you should use memset or pointers as there's no kernel call then.

[onahoe]

Originally Posted by jhonatasaz

You say to read the last line in the post. HGWC not strategic writing this I did not understand what it is to explain it. For I am with an error Chamdo "Found! Try to inject" Windows 7 64-bit.

Just try again.. If it dont work after the 10th try, pm me.

Originally Posted by snow911

You have some serious resource leak issues in your code. Try using a local private variable for your HANDLE and call OpenProcess in your constructor. Use CloseHandle in your destructor, otherwise the system has no chance to know you're done with those process handles. At the moment you're using 10 handles, that's not healthy.

Oh, and if you're using that code within the targets address space you should use memset or pointers as there's no kernel call then.

Ich werd's später sowieso updaten Danke ^^

[iwhitex3]

when hgwc showed up it dissapeared the bypass disasapeared straight away