Quote:
Originally Posted by SilentAccess
Fbi.moe’s source code is 2 years old, it’s absolutely useless and can’t be used in any way. Even if it was up to date, it’s not optimized well. The fbi.moe dev said enjoy his ImGui menu, as he knows all the other code is useless and so the menu is the only thing similar in the cheat. That’s like saying anyone who uses default ImGui is selling someone’s open-sourced code. You just made an account this month to make this comment, obviously just here to say something. We could have swapped out the menu for any other ImGui menu and you wouldn’t be crying here saying we’re selling open sourced code.
|
I've thoroughly investigated the binary you're selling, and it's clear you've made minimal modifications to our open-source code while misrepresenting both what you've done and what our original code contains.
Let me address your specific claims:
1. "FBI.moe's source code is 2 years old, absolutely useless and can't be used in any way."
- Yet you're literally using it with minimal changes and selling it for $45/month.
2. "The menu is the only thing similar in the cheat."
- Your binary contains our exact custom UI system - not "plain ImGui" as you falsely claim. Our UI is custom-drawn with only ImGui containers as a framework.
- You've kept our original bindings intact, including "ultramutation("main")" and the 4 empty ultra calls.
- The unoptimized loop with all our custom asset names remains unchanged.
- The CheatFunction shared pointer with all our lambdas is identical.
- Our entire class structure is present and unmodified.
- Our config system is unchanged.
- This is just a small list of what you're using. You're using our full SDK with 0 changes, full base everything. Even the aimbot debug strings are still there.
3. "We could have swapped out the menu for any other ImGui menu."
- You didn't even do that - you simply changed colors in our custom imgui UI.
Proof Media:
Additionally, you claim to use VMProtect while shipping a completely unprotected debug build. You're distributing the VmprotectSDK.dll and even the DmaLibrary.lib files to customers - demonstrating a fundamental misunderstanding of how protection works, while charging users $45/month for what is essentially our code with minimal modifications.
Furthermore, you're offering "Rep us and verify trade for a free key" - a practice that explicitly violates elitepvpers rules by soliciting positive reputation in exchange for free keys without users even testing the product. This kind of manipulation further demonstrates your unethical business practices.
If you had been honest about building upon an open-source project instead of disparaging it while simultaneously profiting from it, this wouldn't be an issue. Instead, you've chosen to misrepresent both our work and your own contributions.
Don't paste and lie kids. Admins please take down this copy paste. sellers
Kind regards,
Fbi.moe Team.