[DIF] MAP_ALLOW extended.

[5203307a]

OMFG! Thanks a lot!!

[AntiMask]

you are the best!

thanks, dude!

regards antimask

[Kriegergeist^^]

Du bist mein neuer Gott
Vielen dank das du es pub machst

MfG
Kriegergeist^^

[IgorGlock]

omg, wegen 2 Bytes so'ne Show.

[i<3house]

und wie viele maps sind dann möglich oder soll das mehr als 32 dann eine unbegrenzte zahl heißen ?

[~LuckyStrike~]

Nice one i will use this Dif, but in regulare it isn't good
to take more than 32 Maps for one Core ...
Better make a Device other Core and change the configs there
Speak Core99 Core 1 - 3 and Core61_1 etc

[£αšεℜ™]

Niice weiter so

[Mashkin]

Originally Posted by IgorGlock

omg, wegen 2 Bytes so'ne Show.

Wieso denn 2? es ist doch nur eins was geändert wird.

And from just looking at the diff I guess that the byte contains the maximum map count. So with this offset you more likely can change the MAP_ALLOW limit to any value storable in one byte (0-255).

However, this hype is just an overreaction.
In productive mode I wouldn't even assign 20 maps to one core, especially not the main ones (a1, a3, b1, b3, c1, c3 etc).

[dudecook]

someone could give me the dif patcher plz ?

[ReckLess.]

This is my Dif-Patcher by iMer and then edited by me:

[dudecook]

very thx

[Fear *_*]

YEAH! Thank u!!!!

[almobd3]

thank you very much.

I hope that it will be tested in roots with a large amount of players.

thank you again.

[idoleast]

is ok to have more than 32 maps on a core?

???

[Mashkin]

Originally Posted by idoleast

is ok to have more than 32 maps on a core?

???

You should better not do it.
There has been a clue about that when the developers chose to limit the amount of maps per core.

You should rather setup a new core and distribute the most visited maps over all your cores to create a balance.

I myself wouldn't even assign more than 15 maps to one core if not really needed.