Moontic

Thanks for the detailed explanation. I understand that even for the same memory write function, DMA is safer because it doesn't go through the CPU. I know that BE, EAC, and anti-chea...

I think the reply I wrote caused a misunderstanding I did not use ESP CHAMS from DMA, I used ESP CHAMS from internal cheat. I thought the risk was the same in that both internal ch...

In EFT, I've seen a post saying that we don't need to use KMBOX because aim-bot is completely safe. Nevertheless, I'm cautious because it's memory writing after all. If youre alrea...

In EFT, I've seen a post saying that we don't need to use KMBOX because aim-bot is completely safe. Nevertheless, I'm cautious because it's memory writing after all. Memory writing...

Are you saying that all EFT cheats currently don't have an aim-bot feature using KMBOX? All DMA cheats offer memory writing aimbot since it's not risky at all. Lones doesn't have...

thanks for answer What about the aim-bot(use kmbox) or writing feature(to mem)? Have user ever had a manual ban? Or not, but do you predict it to be dangerous? you dont need a k...

1. I want to use DMA but only secure memory read-only features. I want to use the visChams feature, but I've seen several threads mention that this feature is risky. Isn't it really s...