Register for your free account! | Forgot your password?

Go Back   elitepvpers > Popular Games > League of Legends
You last visited: Today at 14:26

  • Please register to post and access all features, it's quick, easy and FREE!

Advertisement



Comparing LegendSense and BGX

Discussion on Comparing LegendSense and BGX within the League of Legends forum part of the Popular Games category.

Reply
 
Old   #1
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 14
Received Thanks: 7
Comparing LegendSense and BGX

Hey everyone,

Recently, I decided to try out LS after using BGX for several months. However, I can't help but feel that LS doesn't offer any significant advantages over BGX, especially considering its higher price point. The loader for LS is noticeably worse, and the champion logics didn't feel any better than the community-made ones in BGX, specifically for champions like Kaisa, Ezreal, Varus and Zeri. While some people claim that LS has a better evade, I rarely use evade in my games, so I didn't notice much difference there either.

The only aspect where LS seemed to excel was the jungle tracker, which was more stable compared to BGX. But is that the only significant improvement? I'm not sure if I would prefer LS over BGX, even if they were priced the same, let alone with a more than three times difference in price. It's worth mentioning that I remember LS and BGX both experiencing a ban wave months ago, which was the only time I got banned using BGX. I haven't been using any bypass, so detection can't be considered a point in favor of LS too. I'm confident that BGX is not detected. Those who claim otherwise probably have flagged HWIDs.

Personally, I remain unconvinced that LS is worth the investment.

TL;DR: I recently tried a LS sub after using BGX for a while and found no notable improvements. The loader is worse, champion logics are on par with BGX's community-made ones, and the detection experience was similar. The only standout feature was a more stable jungle tracker. Considering the price difference, I wouldn't choose LS over BGX, even if they were priced the same.
ardaw is offline  
Thanks
1 User
Old 06/30/2023, 10:45   #2
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 11
Received Thanks: 3
You said you don't use evade, which happens to be the thing carrying LS as a platform. No platform compares to LS evade.

Not surprised.
humanbean6 is offline  
Thanks
1 User
Old 06/30/2023, 12:08   #3
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 14
Received Thanks: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by humanbean6 View Post
You said you don't use evade, which happens to be the thing carrying LS as a platform. No platform compares to LS evade.

Not surprised.
Honestly I did use it for a while too but I still didn't feel that much of difference, but the customizability did seem huge. BGX Evade still feels more than enough for legit gameplay though, maybe the main difference is in obvious evade settings.
ardaw is offline  
Thanks
1 User
Old 06/30/2023, 12:23   #4
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 11
Received Thanks: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardaw View Post
Honestly I did use it for a while too but I still didn't feel that much of difference, but the customizability did seem huge. BGX Evade still feels more than enough for legit gameplay though, maybe the main difference is in obvious evade settings.

There's a clear difference, as you said, in customization, pathfinding and more.

BGX core evade is AWFUL, and AuroraEvade is an update away from being completely unusable (like most of the stuff Amber releases, pushes an "update" for, and ends up abandoning)


Evade is the main selling point for LS for a good reason.
Many of their champs have average at best logic, excluding maybe FunHouse releases and maybe a couple of the core champions.


But yeah I do agree, LS is not worth 100$/m for what you get in terms of champion logic, orbwalker, and prediction.
humanbean6 is offline  
Thanks
1 User
Old 06/30/2023, 17:12   #5
 
Râgequí¿'s Avatar
 
elite*gold: 123
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 83
Received Thanks: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by humanbean6 View Post
There's a clear difference, as you said, in customization, pathfinding and more.

BGX core evade is AWFUL, and AuroraEvade is an update away from being completely unusable (like most of the stuff Amber releases, pushes an "update" for, and ends up abandoning)


Evade is the main selling point for LS for a good reason.
Many of their champs have average at best logic, excluding maybe FunHouse releases and maybe a couple of the core champions.


But yeah I do agree, LS is not worth 100$/m for what you get in terms of champion logic, orbwalker, and prediction.
BGX has a nice design tho, players cry about being banned after 3 – 4 days
others don't get banned for months.
Ls is not worth $100 a month, never ever.
Râgequí¿ is offline  
Thanks
1 User
Old 07/09/2023, 00:25   #6
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 7
Received Thanks: 2
LS Riven, Fiora, GP are worth buying a day key once in a while
Dzed2022 is offline  
Old 07/13/2023, 15:20   #7
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 7
Received Thanks: 0
If you want to play adcs then ls is not a good choice, that all. They adc is wordt compare to bgx, at least the evade is good
LaxusiG is offline  
Old 07/16/2023, 10:28   #8
 
elite*gold: 13
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 18
Received Thanks: 1
What about bruhwalker?

How is their logic / pred / evade?
KBOYmvp is offline  
Old 07/17/2023, 16:50   #9
 
elite*gold: 0
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 14
Received Thanks: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by KBOYmvp View Post
What about bruhwalker?

How is their logic / pred / evade?
I didn't get to try it since it's private, i also never applied. I heard good things about it though
ardaw is offline  
Reply


Similar Threads Similar Threads
Comparing 2 hashes: local and website
01/21/2017 - .NET Languages - 5 Replies
Hey, i'm about to code a patcher for a server but im struggling. I need to compare the local client with the uploaded client on the homepage and if they aren't the same it should delete the local one and download the online one. I know that this is possible with hashes but i don't know how to start. Google won't really help me i only found out how to compare 2 local hashes.
[Help] Packet Editor - Comparing Socket Data.
07/29/2011 - General Coding - 9 Replies
Hello, I want to save and compare the data of a 2 packets, and finding out if they contain the same data... Thanks to u-coRe & Metin2Spieler97 i have something like this, and its working great! Thanks for the help!!! This part saves the 1rst packet to be compared. bool paso0(const char* buf,int len){



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:26.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Support | Contact Us | FAQ | Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Abuse
Copyright ©2024 elitepvpers All Rights Reserved.