[VS2022] Server v19 theme multiple

[Ruby-FlyFF]

#

[styxhelix3]

this is based on flyff Guru right?

[Ruby-FlyFF]

Yes __VER 19 in guru and other system
and most guru fixes are bugged I just added what would be useful

[FIorist]

No, this garbage is not based on “guru”. Some random ****** source which builded on base from another forum with some my old broken snippets inside, and I’m pretty sure, with some backdoors. French kid aka “ryandiffer” still trying to scam some peoples, sad. Thread reported.

[Ruby-FlyFF]

Thread reported? For her reason? All the added systems are already published on the other forums, I have mounted myself these are sources and it has in no case garbage, the basic sources are ketchups, simply a reissue for the interface v19 has been made and some guru systems. Why would you ever want to help the community? Would you have preferred that source be sold? I didn’t gain anything by having published but sources for free, just to avoid a sales that was already underway, you say that this file are garbage cans, you don’t know what invented, you try to scare the people who will use this source. you are a "Rageux". I wish you a good evening myself I would contact the administrators regarding your comments.

No backdoor I myself mounted this file, what don’t you understand?

PS : 0 Bug in this sources.
Otherwise one explains the what? Uneducated.
Stop scaring people and go back and sell your buggy systems.

[FIorist]

Originally Posted by Ruby-FlyFF

Thread reported? For her reason? All the added systems are already published on the other forums, I have mounted myself these are sources and it has in no case garbage, the basic sources are ketchups, simply a reissue for the interface v19 has been made and some guru systems. Why would you ever want to help the community? Would you have preferred that source be sold? I didn’t gain anything by having published but sources for free, just to avoid a sales that was already underway, you say that this file are garbage cans, you don’t know what invented, you try to scare the people who will use this source. you are a "Rageux". I wish you a good evening myself I would contact the administrators regarding your comments.

No backdoor I myself mounted this file, what don’t you understand?

PS : 0 Bug in this sources.
Otherwise one explains the what? Uneducated.
Stop scaring people and go back and sell your buggy systems.

Yeah, thread reported because you have not any permissions to publish my old work, even if this work was done 1-2 years ago and already released in another forum.

“Stop scaring people and go back and sell your buggy systems.”
Why then half of your source - is my old, as you said, “bugged systems”

[Ruby-FlyFF]

Lol , this is by no means your project, it’s source are the ketchup and not guru, simply version 19 was added from this, I myself have built this source for the community like people like you who don’t help anyone and sell systems has huge prices for the little line of code there is. Esteemed you happy to make sales with your files, I don’t make any sales I publish my work for people who need it, and have it’s not a job from 2 years ago, I mounted them myself this weekend. 2 years ago visual studio 2022 didn’t exist here? Idiot!

I made it clear that I did not add any buggy system simply. the 50.000 fix guru that are useless are not in but sources.

And here I had to give credit to someone it is a ketchup that helps the community enormously. it’s source are hers, I’ve just improved it in my ways.

[FIorist]

I guess you should increase your English skill a bit. No wait any response from me from now on, you just a clown, no have any reasons to continue talk with you.

[Miracle`]

*Grabs popcorn..

[SandIsWater]

Originally Posted by FIorist

Yeah, thread reported because you have not any permissions to publish my old work, even if this work was done 1-2 years ago and already released in another forum.

“Stop scaring people and go back and sell your buggy systems.”
Why then half of your source - is my old, as you said, “bugged systems”

Okay, remove 168 Inventory, ARROW_FIX, CONEXP, ONEHANDED_YOYO or like a bunch of other stuff. =\ I don't give permission for it to be leaked or in anyone's files, and yet they are still here? I even shared chat logs of arrow_fix

Also, if they're so broken, why even care? Why even care when it's not a full source rewrite compatible with C++20 standards either lmao.

[Ruby-FlyFF]

@

Just that I’m French and I don’t use translators , that’s how we learn little by little, excuse me for wanting to integrate into your community. I’m done answering you, you’re ruining my job.

[FIorist]

Originally Posted by SandIsWater

Okay, remove 168 Inventory, ARROW_FIX, CONEXP, ONEHANDED_YOYO or like a bunch of other stuff. =\ I don't give permission for it to be leaked or in anyone's files, and yet they are still here? I even shared chat logs of arrow_fix

Also, if they're so broken, why even care? Why even care when it's not a full source rewrite compatible with C++20 standards either lmao.

I don’t care about this leaks myself, I care only about peoples who paid for some my snippets long time ago, this is the reason why I continue report every such ****** thread.

[aoyamananami]

*removed whole quote of first post*

hello thank you for this source, is this ready for live server?

[SandIsWater]

Originally Posted by FIorist

I don’t care about this leaks myself, I care only about peoples who paid for some my snippets long time ago, this is the reason why I continue report every such ****** thread.

Poor Athrob from China. =\ there's only a few differences. Like the option window integration =\

edit: mute background music but not dsutil sounds =\. + doing checks on framemove? man 1$ most for these low tier edits. poor whoever bought it

[FIorist]

Originally Posted by SandIsWater

Poor Athrob from China. =\

It was included in single define, but i was selling just "background music". Both this things was just merged. In any case, it was pretty old cheap snippet which was sold 2 years ago (?) i guess.

You talking about price, but the thing is: prices for my first works was as low as my first works were. I not talking about my low-tier work now, some of it was really stupid and had price few more bucks than needed, i not decline this. But its still my work and i have rights to protect it, isn't it? And doesn't really matter if its small fix for few bucks or some kind of big system.